Friday, October 27, 2017

Parshas Lech Lecha - Test by Design

~ Thoughts on the Parsha ~
 Parshas Lech Lecha
L'iluy nishmas Calev ben Amitai Yoel Ha'kohen

 
Test by Design
By: Daniel Listhaus

 וַה' אָמַר אֶל אַבְרָם אַחֲרֵי הִפָּרֶד לוֹט מֵעִמּוֹ שָׂא נָא עֵינֶיךָ וּרְאֵה מִן הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר אַתָּה שָׁם צָפֹנָה וָנֶגְבָּה וָקֵדְמָה וָיָמָּה: כִּי אֶת כָּל הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר אַתָּה רֹאֶה לְךָ אֶתְּנֶנָּה וּלְזַרְעֲךָ עַד עוֹלָם:

“Hashem said to Avram after Lot had parted from him, ‘Raise now your eyes and look out from where you are: northward, southward, eastward, and westward. For all the land that you see, to you will I give it, and to your descendants forever. ”
-Lech Lecha 13:14-15

            The Torah[1] relates that Lot’s shepherds of Lot started quarreling with the Avraham’s shepherds. Rashi[2] explains that the cause of the dispute was that Lot’s shepherds would graze their cattle in the fields of others, and Avrahams’s shepherds would rebuke them saying that they were stealing by allowing their animals to graze in other’s fields. However, Lot’s shepherds would just rationalize and retort that the land [Eretz Yisroel] was promised to Avraham, and being that he has no heir, Lot’s family would inherit it so it is not really stealing. This of course was nothing more than a rationalization because as the next passuk (verse) says, “The Canaanite and Perizzite were then dwelling in the land”, so Avraham did not yet have possession of it. As we know, this argument resulted in Lot separating from Avraham and moving to Sodom.

            The passuk[3] tells us that right after Lot parted from Avraham, Hashem came to Avraham and told him to look around in all four directions, that all the land he could see will be his and his descendents forever. Rashi[4] is bothered by why the Torah feels it necessary to stress the fact that it was specifically right after Lot left Avraham that Hashem came to speak to him. Rashi answers that the entire time Lot was with Avraham, Hashem did not speak to Avraham because Lot was wicked.

            The S’forno, however, has a different approach. The S’forno[5] writes that the reason Hashem waited to tell this to Avraham until after Lot left was because Hashem was concerned that had He come to Avraham while Lot was still around, the reinforced message that Eretz Yisroel would be given to Avraham would have caused Lot and his shepherds to become haughty and feel that they already owned the place and make themselves comfortable, stealing whatever they wanted. Therefore, Hashem waited for Lot to leave before he spoke to Avraham and showed him all the land He promised to him and his descendents.

            The obvious problem with this S’forno is that Hashem’s plan did not seem to work. The S’forno is saying that Hashem waited for lot to leave Avraham in order to speak to him because He did not want Lot to come to steal. However, that happened anyway! The whole reason why Lot and Avraham split up was because of the fighting that Avraham’s shepherds had with Lot’s to try to get them to stop stealing others’ property. So what did Hashem gain – so to speak – by waiting for Lot to leave in order to speak to Avraham? It seems like either way Lot ended up feeling that he had divine rights to Eretz Yisroel?

            The purpose of life and G-d’s role in this world are topics that have been debated by philosophers for centuries. There are so many levels of belief each varying when it comes to understanding these core questions. Some believe that the world was created by accident and that humans are a product of chance. Therefore, by definition, life has no purpose, ethics, morals, or expectations other than those made up by man in order to live together under the same sky. Others believe that G-d put us here for His entertainment, which does not either even deserve a refutation. We as Jews however not only hold onto Judaism – the Torah she’bichsacv (Written Torah), the Torah she’ba’al peh (Oral Torah), and our mesorah (tradition) – as a religion, but rather even more, that it contains in it the chochmah (wisdom) and insight into the purpose of mankind and the world as a whole with an order and system to everything – even including things as basic as thought, speech and the most mundane of actions such as which shoe lace to tie first. Not only is the world and everything in it purposeful, but Hashem’s involvement is intricate and intimate.

            As a person lives through life, he or she is inevitably met with struggles and challenges. Sometimes these challenges are in the form of a spiritual struggle bein adom l’makom. Other times it is an interpersonal struggle bein adom l’chaveiro. Sometimes we are challenged financially, sometimes physically, and other times mentally or emotionally. And often times we could even prove to be our own worst enemies and have internal struggles which eat us up alive.

Although to point to a single idea and declare it as the purpose of life is way beyond the scope of this d’var Torah, what we could do as at least understand that there is a purpose which exists and that life’s challenges are not only a necessary means to achieve that purpose, but that life’s challenges are actually hand-picked for us individually by Hashem Himself. Hashem understands our nature perfectly, for he created us. Therefore it is He alone who is able to construct the perfect challenges for us to overcome and grow from. Hashem knows the different measures of the various middos (character traits) He injected in each person individually. Each person has his or her own breaking point, level of patience, degree of frustration and anger, etc. All of these aspects are taken into account and used to create the perfect test for us to grow in the areas we struggle in. Hashem sends us these purposely and they are only meant to help us. The key to it all, though, is the understanding that Hashem never sends us something that is impossible for us to overcome. Yes, things may be extremely difficult, and yes we will fail many times. However, Hashem never sets us up for guaranteed failure. Every nisayon (test) is with the trust and hope that we will make the right decisions and overcome it.

            Perhaps with this we could better understand the S’forno. Lot was clearly someone who was wicked and although he would never be able to withstand the types of tests that Avraham was challenged with, he was given his own little challenge – not to succumb to his rationalizations and thievery. Hashem sent Lot this test and alas he failed. However, the nisayon given to him was one he could have won; and had he passed the test and not succumbed to his wickedness, he would have grown and become a better person. However, had Hashem come to reinforce the message to Avraham, that he was to receive Eretz Yisroel, while Lot was still around, then Lot’s test would have become inaccurate and unfair because it would have been too difficult for him to hold himself back from stealing; and Hashem does not give us tests that we cannot pass.

            We must realize that Hashem is not out to get us and that all nisyonos sent our way are ones we are capable of passing. We are tasked to keep davening for Hashem’s help in all that we do and put in our hishtadlus in meeting our challenges in whichever form they may take. They will be hard, they will take effort, we won’t always know why, and they will be life changing; they have to be. However, perhaps even harder than the challenges themselves is mentally and emotionally accepting our nisyonos and yisrurin with a love. A love that Hashem feels that we and our tefillos are worth specifically paying attention and tailor-designing the obstacle course of life at precisely the right level.

            May we be zocheh to overcome all of our own personal nisyonos and yisurin, achieve the level of channeling the emotional efforts required to overcome them into acceptance instead of doubt, fear, or anger, and to in fact be zocheh for Hashem to answer “yes” to our tefillos during our most critical times of need.




[1] Beraishis 13:7
[2] Rashi ibid.
[3] Beraishis 13:14
[4] Rashi ibid.
[5] Ibid.


No comments:

Post a Comment