Friday, November 29, 2013

Parshas Miketz and Chanukah - Thanksgivakkah: It's Never Late, Nor Is It Early... It Arrives Precisely When We Mean It To

Parshas Miketz
and
Chanukah



Thanksgivakkah:
It's Never Late, Nor Is It Early... It Arrives Precisely When We Mean It To
By: Daniel Listhaus

וַיִּיטַב הַדָּבָר בְּעֵינֵי פַרְעֹה וּבְעֵינֵי כָּל עֲבָדָיו: וַיֹּאמֶר פַּרְעֹה אֶל עֲבָדָיו הֲנִמְצָא כָזֶה אִישׁ אֲשֶׁר רוּחַ אֱלֹקים בּוֹ: וַיֹּאמֶר פַּרְעֹה אֶל יוֹסֵף אַחֲרֵי הוֹדִיעַ אֱלֹהִים אוֹתְךָ אֶת כָּל זֹאת אֵין נָבוֹן וְחָכָם כָּמוֹךָ: אַתָּה תִּהְיֶה עַל בֵּיתִי וְעַל פִּיךָ יִשַּׁק כָּל עַמִּי רַק הַכִּסֵּא אֶגְדַּל מִמֶּךָּ: וַיֹּאמֶר פַּרְעֹה אֶל יוֹסֵף רְאֵה נָתַתִּי אֹתְךָ עַל כָּל אֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם

The matter appeared good in the eyes of Pharoah and in the eyes of his servants. And Pharoah said to his servants, 'Could we find like this – a man in whom is the spirit of G-d?” Then Pharoah said to Yosef, 'Since G-d has informed you of all this, there is no one so discerning and wise as you. You shall be over my house and by your command shall all my people be sustained; only by the throne shall I outrank you.'
-Miketz 41:37-40

If we were to stop for a moment and take a look at the world around us, we would find a scary parallel between the mentality of our time and that which filled the air during the story of Chanukah. In early America, one of the biggest challenges that Jews faced was keeping Shabbos. In a world where Saturday was another workday, it was almost impossible to maintain a steady position without giving up Shabbos. This caused many people to be mechalel Shabbos (desecrate the Shabbos) and distance themselves from orthodox Jewry. Over the years, these families became less and less religious and are now completely intermarried and assimilated Jews who are parents to families of goyim.1 Unfortunately, early American Jewry was not the end of the struggle to keep Shabbos. Nowadays, with the questions that many have, the general lack of emotional bond to Judaism, and the strong lure to want to fit into the 21st Century culture, there is a contemporary challenge of keeping Shabbos as well, which draws from an addiction to technology and search for pleasures which the Torah perspective does not endorse. This is a struggle which is affecting even our sheltered frum communities and circles, let alone the non-frum Jews across America and throughout Israel. What will happen to the Jewish nation without Shabbos as the time to stop and think about Hashem being the borei (Creator) and manhig (Director) of the world?
Moreover, as if the spiritual rebellion of teens and adults is not enough, even things as basic to Judaism as bris millah (circumcision) are now being called into question. In many European countries over the past few years there have been a number of governments which tried to outlaw bris millah because of its “danger” to a baby's health. Recently, however, there has been a disturbing story a little closer to home circulating international news about a women who has been refusing to give her son bris millah. Beis Din (Jewish court) of course ruled that she must give her son bris millah and established a fine of 500 shekel per day (equivalent to about $140 dollars) for every day that she does not allow her baby to get bris millah. The woman has already brought her case to the beis din of appeals, arguing that she has the right to disallow her baby son from getting bris millah, however, the beis din of course upheld the ruling of the first beis din. After all, unless the baby would be in mortal danger, no one could forbid a baby from getting a bris. When in history has there been such a craziness that a Jewish mother prevent her son from bris millah?
Additionally, this year, with all the hype of Chanukah falling out so early this year – on Thanksgiving, as opposed to around the Christian holiday season – there has been talk about Thanksgivakkah and how this year that Chanukah falls out so ridiculously early there is such a confusion because it is not what people are used to. We have become so used to living simultaneously with two calendars – celebrating Hebrew birthdays, English birthdays, American holidays, and Jewish yomim tovim, that we have become insensitive to the uniqueness of the Jewish Calendar itself.
How unfortunate that these three areas which we have done to ourselves and are so greatly affecting us as a nation in our times, are exactly the three things which the Hellenistic Greeks worked so hard to try to get us to give up during the time of Chanukah. It is documented and well known that like our enemies before and after, the Greeks made many decrees targeted specifically against Judaism. Among these decrees were the outlawing of performing bris millah, keeping Shabbos, and declaring the rosh chodesh (new moon) each month.
If we were to put ourselves in the shoes of our enemies and were plotting to solve the “Jewish problem”, we would think that the rituals to stop would be those that seem most provocative. Perhaps decrees against wearing a yarmulka, putting on tefillin, or having tzitzis flying out would be on the list of things which make us stand out; but why Shabbos, bris millah, and rosh chodesh? Keeping Shabbos is at best passive-aggressive, bris millah is something which is kept private, and declaring the new moon is definitely not one of the first things that comes to mind when thinking about the weird activities Jews do. However, it must be that when it came to their discussions of how to solve the “Jewish problem” they found that the three most threatening mitzvos were exactly these three – bris millah, Shabbos, and rosh chodesh. How could we understand this?
In order to understand the decrees of the Greeks, we must get some clarity on what their underlying interests and goals were. Simply put, the Greeks were fighting a war on ruchniyus (spirituality). Unlike by the story of Purim when Antiochus and Haman wanted to wipe out the entire Jewish nation, the Greeks wanted to do no such thing.2 Instead, they preferred that every Jew convert their beliefs and instead blend with the Hellenistic culture. The Hellenistic culture which was spreading at the time advocated the perfectness of the human body and the importance of understanding science, because, after all, science has an explanation for any question.
With this in mind, let us revisit the three decrees that the Hellenistic Greeks declared against us during the time of Chanukah. When we do bris millah, we are taking the naturally created human body, and turning it into a source of kedusha (holiness) by making a sign with Hashem. Shabbos too is something intangible that we cannot feel or see, yet somehow we accept this invisible force and feel compelled to stop ourselves from doing certain activities. There is no room for such invisible forces within Hellenism. The human body is good straight from the package and there is no such thing as a force which cannot be seen unless it rhymes with gravity and has a scientific explanation.
When the Greeks discovered that we declare rosh chodesh each month, they found this too to be intolerable. The concept of declaring rosh chodesh is really fascinating. This first mitzva, which was given to the Jewish people as a nation,3 is one which commands the Sanhedrin (Jewish court) to declare rosh chodesh. Every month is either malei ('full' – 30 days) or chaseir ('missing' – 29 days). This will depend on when the new moon is seen and when beis din officially declares it to be rosh chodesh. It is not too hard to understand the types of ramifications which could potentially occur as a result of beis din deciding when to declare the new moon. It could make a difference when a boy becomes a bar- mitzva or when the Yomim Tovim (Holidays) will fall out that year.
As a matter of fact, there is an incredible story in the Mishnayos which demonstrates this idea. The Mishnayos4 relate that Rabban Gamliel (the head of the Sanhedrin at the time) had diagrams of the shapes of the moon on his wall. He used to show these to the witnesses who would come testify about the new moon, and would point to these diagrams and ask, “Did you see it like this, or like that?”
One time, a pair of witnesses came in and said, “We saw it at its proper time”. However, on the following night it could not be seen. Yet, Rabban Gamliel still accepted them as good witnesses. Rabbi Dosa ben Hurkanus, however, said that they were false witnesses, and Rabbi Yehoshua agreed that they were indeed false witnesses. Obviously, with this dispute between Rabban Gamliel and Rabbi Yehoshua, there would be major practical differences in the Jewish calendar, as they were arguing over what day of which month they were in.
Rabban Gamliel then sent a message ordering Rabbi Yehoshua to appear before him on the day that Yom Kippur fell out according to Rabbi Yehoshua's calculation with his staff and wallet in his hand.5 After Rabbi Yehoshua had received this letter, he was greatly troubled. Rabbi Akiva came to him and convinced him not to worried because whatever Rabban Gamliel rules is the truth. He explained that being that Rabban Gamliel was the leader of the generation, the head of the Sanhedrin HaGadol, what he says represents the Toras emes and we cannot argue. Now confident, Rabbi Yehoshua took his staff and wallet on the day that he had calculated to be Yom Kippur (which Rabban Gamliel did not because of the difference in calculations) and he went to Rabban Gamliel. Upon seeing him, Rabban Gamliel stood up and kissed him on the head and said to him, “Come in peace, my master and my disciple! My master in wisdom, and my disciple because you have accepted my words.”
This principle, that Hashem gave the power to the Sanhedrin to literally change when the end of a month and beginning of the next would be, is something which bothered the Hellenistic Greeks so much. How could it be that we have the ability to turn mundane things into Holy experiences and how could it be that a nation has the ability to change a calendar based on the word of a beis din? These were indeed questions which shook the Greeks to their core and why they came to the conclusion that declaring rosh chodesh was such a big threat to their Hellenistic culture. These two very different ideologies certainly do not mix, just like water and oil.
Let us focus for a minute on the decree against the Jews declaring Rosh Chodesh, but at the same time let us zoom out to understand the bigger picture of what it represents.
In this week's parsha, after Yosef had interpreted the dreams of Pharoah to Pharoah's satisfaction6, he advised that the Egyptian government do something to prepare itself for the years of famine. Yosef advocated that there should be an overseer set up to organize a country-wide hoarding of food during the seven good years so that they would be able to make it through the seven years of famine.7 Pharoah immediately demanded that Yosef take the position. He commanded that everyone listen to whatever Yosef tells them to do. Yosef's tale was the ultimate from-rags-to-riches story. One day, he was a slave thrown into prison; the next, he had the entire Egypt at his fingertips having to answer to no one but Pharoah himself.
One of the most fundamental laws of Mitzrayim (Egypt) at that time was that a slave cannot rule. As a matter of fact, when Pharoah was bothered by his dreams and the Sar HaMashkim (cup-bearer) informed him of Yosef – the master dream interpreter, the Sar HaMashkim told Pharoah that Yosef was a “youth, a Hebrew, and a slave”.8 Rashi9 explains that the Sar HaMashkim was hinting to Pharoah that Yosef was a fool, not capable of greatness, not familiar with the culture and language of Mitzrayim, and is anyway unable to rule because it says in the constitution of Mitzrayim that a slave may not rule or even wear royal clothing. If this was true, why did Pharoah allow Yosef to take such a high position?

When Pharoah appointed Yosef as the overseer of Mitzrayim, he said, “Since G-d has informed you of all this, there is no one as discerning and wise as you. You shall be in charge over my house and by your command shall all my people be sustained; only by the throne shall I outrank you.”10 The Beis HaLeivi11 writes that when Pharoah was telling over his dreams to Yosef, he purposely changed some details of his dream in order to test him. However, Yosef saw through these fabrications and was able to construct a logical and true explanation of Pharoah's dreams, even including the parts that Pharoah left out. When Pharoah saw that Yosef was able to interpret his dream, he immediately realized that Hashem must have helped him and therefore appointed him as vice president of Mitzrayim.

However, there seems to be something basic missing from this whole picture. What is so special about being able to interpret dreams correctly that merits such respect? Interpreting dreams sounds like something anyone can do. As a matter of fact, the Gemara12 brings a statement from Rav Huna, who said, “A dream that has not yet been interpreted is like a letter that has not yet been read.” The Gemara13 continues and explains that all dreams follow after the mouth. Meaning, that a dream alone is vacuous, and until it is defined by some interpretation, it will remain having no effect on anything. Only once it is explained will it come to fruition in this world. The Gemara14 offers a story of someone who had a dream and went to twenty-four different interpreters. Each of these interpreters gave their own interpretation, and indeed all twenty-four came true. Through each one's explanation, many realities came into being. How could we understand this concept? Why do dreams follow after the mouth of the interpreter? Also, still, what is so special about being able to interpret dreams, if seemingly one could explain it any way? And furthermore, what does it mean to interpret a dream properly?

In the society we live in where animals are given almost as many rights as people – a world where dogs have “Bark-Mitzvahs”15 and cats inherit their owners,16 it is sometimes hard for us to realize what in fact are the differences between man and animals. Animals and people seem to share a lot in common. We both are not only alive, but can move around.17 Animals seem to get attitude swings and emotions, just as people do. We both get hungry, both need sleep, and both could get sick. However, if one were to stop and contemplate about some of the most fundamental and basic differences between man and animals, there are two things which immediately come to mind. The first is that humans think. Although at times we may seem to sometimes be operating on auto-pilot or instinct, one of the incredible qualities that we have is that we have the ability to think, discern, and reason. This is something that we acknowledge and thank Hashem for multiple times a day.18

Another incredible aspect of man is his ability to speak. Speech is something unique to humans who were created b'tzelem Elokim (in the image of G-d), because speech is a quality which is special to Hashem Himself. Every day in davening we declare, “Baruch She'amar V'haya Ha'olam” - “Blessed is He Who spoke and the world came into being.” Furthermore, the Mishnayos19 describe that the world was created with ten utterances. It was through Hashem's speech that the world was created. There is something G-dly special about the power of speech, and yet, that ability was given to man to utilize.

It is not a coincidence that these two G-dly factors are essential parts of us. Thought and speech are inter-related, and depend heavily on each other. The mouth is the tool we have to transform our thoughts and materialize them into words. Speech is the medium between the spiritual, intangible world, and the physical world we live in. One can not tune one's ears to hear someone else's thoughts; however, with speech we could translate the language of thought into something that could be physically heard.

The halacha (law)20 is that when one davens (prays) one must move his mouth and utter the words. Simply thinking the tefillah (prayer) is not enough, davening has to be actually expressed in words. This idea is a little difficult to understand. Why is it so important to mouth the words? If we know what it means and we are taking the time to think about it, why should Hashem care how we express ourselves? With our comprehension of the connection between thought and speech, this concept makes perfect sense. When we daven, we are trying to make a connection between us and Hashem. The first step in connecting our physical bodies to Hashem is through translating our thoughts into speech. This is the way that we as humans express the spiritual feelings and thoughts within us.
As mentioned earlier, when one has a dream, the Gemara tells us that it is like an unopened letter. Depending on how it is interpreted, it will come to fruition in different ways. However, the quality of the interpretation itself depends on how much a person is in-tuned to the spiritual world. The higher the level one has achieved in developing his ruchniyus (spirituality), the better one has an understanding of the messages that Hashem tries to send us through dream. The person who attains this strong relationship with the spiritual realm has the inherent ability to utilize his mouth to better convey what people's thoughts and dreams are trying to communicate.

This is what Pharoah realized about Yosef. Yosef did not simply make up an explanation to fit into Pharoah's dreams, like Cinderella's step-sisters trying to squeeze their feet into the glass slipper. Rather, he demonstrated that he knew precisely what the dreams were trying to forewarn. Someone like Yosef who understood, on his level, the ways of Hashem, had a deep comprehension of what messages the dreams were trying to convey. His power of interpretation was strongly linked to his da'as Hashem (Hashem's knowledge). He was therefore able to give Pharoah not just an explanation, but the explanation with perfect accuracy.

Let us now take this whole idea a step further. We know that there is only one Torah and that the Torah is emes – absolute truth describing the ultimate way that man is supposed to live.21 Having said that, the Torah is comprised of two elements, two sides of the same coin: Torah she'bichsav (the written Torah) and Torah she'ba'al peh (the Oral Torah).22 Torah she'bichsav is the written Torah we have from Har Sinai. Torah she'ba'al peh, on the other hand, is its explanation, using the tools and guidelines23 Hashem gave us to decipher the Torah.24 Torah is obviously an incredible gift Hashem gave us to help us try to understand the world from Hashem's viewpoint, and live according to the system that the Torah demands. However, perhaps the most profound aspect of Torah is the Torah she'ba'al peh. Hashem tells us that the Torah is not in the heavens,25 however, it is more than just 'not in the heavens', it is in the hands of man to achieve great levels and interpret the Torah in a way parallel to da'as Hashem, by utilizing the tools Hashem gave us.

The fact that one who honestly learns the Torah for the pure sake of trying to understand Hashem's ways has the ability to define what the Torah means to say, is something which is almost too hard to comprehend. Yet, even this is not the extent of the responsibility that man has in keeping the Torah. We all know that the Torah is the blueprint of the world. For example, the Torah titles certain animals as not kosher and others as kosher. As Jews, we are prohibited from eating non-kosher animals. We do not necessarily understand why Hashem decided that there should be these differences among animals. However, we do understand that because there is a prohibition in the Torah against eating such animals, there becomes something inherent to the animal which will cause us to somehow be endangered if we eat it – even if it only be in spiritual ways which we do not necessarily feel or understand or even relate to. With this in mind, let us re-examine what it means that man was given the privilege to interpret the Torah. If Hashem gave us the ability to understand the Torah in different ways, and the Torah is the blueprint of the world, a conclusion is that a talmid chochom (Torah scholar) has the power to affect the way of the world by defining the blueprint in a way he has determined to be emes (absolute truth and reality).

There is a famous story of a person in the city of Volozhin who suffered from a certain form of lung disease. The man consulted his doctor who advised him to move to Switzerland where the air quality was better. However, one night, the man's father came to him in a dream and warned his son not to leave Volozhin. The father explained, “The type of lung-illness you have is one which is the subject of a machlokes (dispute) between the Beis Yosef and the Rama, regarding if such an illness in an animal renders it treif. In other words, is such a lung illness one which is life-threatening. The Rama holds that such an illness is indeed life-threatening and therefore considers such an animal treif. The Beis Yosef, though, maintains that it is considered kosher. The Rama's opinion is followed by the Ashkenazic Jews throughout Europe, including Switzerland. However, in Voloshin, the Rov is the Sha'agas Aryeh who rules like the Beis Yosef that such an illness is not life-threatening. Therefore, just as in Volozhin such animals are considered one-hundred percent kosher, so too your condition, by definition, must not be life-threatening.” This man's father therefore urged his son to stay in Volozhin and not move out to Switzerland where he would be putting himself in mortal danger. The son listened to his father's advice and ended up living a long life into his eighties, despite having this lung disease.

Similar to interpreting dreams, a person with da'as Torah has the ability to define Torah she'ba'al peh. One could only do so after working on oneself tremendously and ultimately achieving a level of emes and learning with a clarity. One cannot just force an explanation into Torah, it must follow the guidelines we have from Hashem for learning the Torah and must match with all the intricacies of Gemara and halacha. When there is a machlokes whether a certain illness is deemed as treif, it is not just a ruling pulled out of a hat. Rather, it is a conclusion drawn from mesorah (tradition), drashos (exegeses), conclusions from other sugyos (topics) throughout shas (all of Gemara), and s'varos (logic).26 A person who is on the level to be a poseik (halachik authority) for the Jewish people has the enormous responsibility to use the correct tools to reach true halachos. Only a person who has trained his mind to think along the lines of da'as Hashem is able to convert his thoughts and conclusions into p'sak halacha (a final ruling in Jewish law) through the power of speech.

As alluded to earlier, another basic result of man having the ability to act as a medium between the physical and spiritual world is that, with our thoughts and speech, we have the power to transform even the most mundane things we do into actions of kedusha (holiness). By saying brachos (blessings) and having the right intentions in mind, we could modify our lives to be ones of eternal purpose.

Chanukah is the time when we celebrate these ideas. The Greeks tried to spread the Hellenistic culture throughout Europe and Asia. They were particular disturbed about Judaism because so many aspects of Judaism were so diametrically against their culture. We recite in “Al Hanisim” (“For the miracles”),27 that the Greeks wanted to “…Ulehaviram meichukei retzonecha…” (they wanted to remove us from Hashem's decrees). Chukim (decrees) are the mitzvos for which we do not know a reason.28 The Greeks were so adamant about uprooting our chukim because the Greeks only believed in things that could make sense to the human brain. Only things that made sense scientifically were things which they believed to be true. This is why the Greeks heavily worshiped the human body and believed only in things having to do with the physical realm. As Jews, however, we do not limit our beliefs to things which are comprehensible to the human brain. Rather, we receive our charges from a source that is boundless in knowledge – the Creator of the world Himself.

We believe that there is a deep connection between our world and the spiritual one. Torah connects us to Hashem and when we think and speak in Torah we have the ability to tie these two worlds together.

The separation of Jewish and Hellenistic beliefs is what Chanukah is truly about. We can see this idea symbolized by the miracle of the olive oil. A single flask – still bearing the precious seal of the Kohen Gadol - was somehow left undiscovered, untouched, and uninfluenced by the Hellenistic Greeks, later to be found by the Jewish people. As Yehuda HaMaccabee re-lit the Menorah in 165 B.C.E. with this very oil, he was showing that the continuity of the Jewish people lies within their purity and special identity.


The halacha29 is that even a poor person must sell what he owns in order to acquire the minimal amount to fulfill the obligation of lighting the menorah. One might ask, who gave the Rabbis the authority to make such a rule that the poor should sell their possessions and clothing to buy Chanukah candles? However, according to everything we have said so far, perhaps we could see their reasoning clearly. The Chanukah lights, with their unique requirement of parsumei neesah (publicizing the miracle), are a reminder of the separation between our ideology and that of the rest of the world. This is the foundation of being a Jew and for this it is worth giving up everything.
There is only one people in this world who have a Torah she'ba’al peh, and that of course is the Jewish nation. Torah she'ba’al peh is what separates us from the goyim. Everyone has a ‘Bible’ of some sort, but only we have a Torah she'ba’al peh. It was this that the Greeks were fighting against – the irrational uniqueness of the Jews because of our oral law – our proverbial spiritual glasses which allows us to read the Torah and see the world in a different light. The fact that we have the ability to make real differences in the nature of the world itself through various applications of Torah was something that the Greeks could not understand and to which they would never admit.
Every motzei Shabbos (Saturday night) we recite in Havdalah, “Blessed are you, Hashem…who distinguishes between the sacred and the secular, between light and darkness, between Israel and the nations, between the seventh day and the six days of labor…” When we say this, we are thanking Hashem for making us special and lifting us above the other nations. For in reality, the same difference between light and darkness exists in between our way of life and their ideologies. The Mishna30 mentions a similar concept: “He [Rabbi Akiva] used to say: Beloved is man that was created in the image of G-d…. Beloved are the Jews that are called sons to Hashem…” We have to be proud of the fact that we are Jews, children of Hashem and princes to the one and only King. Furthermore, we must realize our responsibility to act as a light for the other nations to show that there is a Hashem who is involved in our daily lives, and that there is a real connection between the spiritual world of kedusha and this world. We must advocate that with the ability to think and speak comes an incredible responsibility to use these tools correctly and keep them pure in emes.
When we pretend that there is nothing wrong within the frum communities, we are hurting no one but ourselves. How could we sit back while the Hellenistic culture seeps into our people and stops many from keeping Shabbos? How could we not be internally torn by the international news of Jews preventing their children from having bris millah? And how could we so easily laugh along at the term “Thanksgivakkah” without thinking twice of the concept that Chanukah is never early, nor late, it arrives precisely when the beis din declares it? We must hold on tight to the neiros Chanukah during these dark times and always keep in mind our uniqueness of being created b'tzelem elokim, with the ability to use thought and speech to make real differences in this world and the calendar.
May Hashem help us internalize these lessons and so that when we look at the lights of the menorah, we see the real light of Chanukah, in order that we could continue the job that Yehuda HaMaccabee reignited years ago.
1A Jewish man who marries a non-Jewish woman will have kids who are not Jewish from birth.
2As a matter of fact, they did not even intend to destroy the Beis Hamikdash. Rather, they just wanted to turn all of our activities into ones that were impure. This is alluded to in Al Hanisim.
3 Rashi Beraishis 1:1
4 Rosh Hashana (mishnayos) 2:8-9
5This is prohibited on Yom Kippur. Rabban Gamliel was demanding that he recognize and accept the Sanhedrin's ruling as to when Yom Kippur would be and that there would be nothing special about the day Rabbi Yehoshua had held was accurate. Therefore, it would be completely permitted for him to carry on the “fake Yom Kippur”.
6Unlike the necromancers and wise men of Mitzrayim who were unable to interpret the dream to Pharoah's satisfaction. See Rashi Beraishis 41:8.
7Ultimately, with the arrival of the tzaddik Yaakov to Mitzrayim, the famine stopped after two years. See Rashi Beraishis 47:19
8Beraishis 41:12
9Ibid.
10Beraishis 41:39-40
11Parshas Miketz
12Berachos 55a
13Berachos 55b
14Ibid.
15Yes. Sad but true...
16No, this was not a joke either. A couple of years ago, Maria Assunta, a wealthy Italian woman who died at the age or 94, left a $13 million dollar fortune to her cat, Tommaso. Believe it or not, Tomasso is not the wealthiest animal in the world. Kalu, a monkey, has $80 million dollars and Gunther IV, a German Shepard, is the proud owner of $372 million dollars (who actually inherited the money from his father, Gunther III).
17Gemara Bava Kamma 2a
18In Shemoneh Esreh in the b'racha of “Attah Chonein”
19Avos 5:1
20For example, see Shulchan Aruch - Orach Chaim: 62:3 and see Mishna Berura there. Similarly, by Birkas HaTorah, see Shulchan Aruch - Orach Chaim 47:4 and Mishna Berura there regarding if thinking Torah requires birkas HaTorah to be said. See also Gemara Berachos (20a).
21This idea is captured in the Rambam's eighth and ninth Ani Ma'amin (Principles of Faith) as well as reflected in Yigdal.
22The Oral Torah was meant to be passed on by word of mouth from generation to generation without being written down. This was the way it was taught and learned until R' Yehuda HaNasi decided to compile the mishnayos, when he saw that Torah she'ba'al peh was in danger of being forgotten.
23The thirteen middos one can use to be doreish the Torah, which are brought down by Rabbi Yishmael in the Sifra. This could be found in the siddur right before p'sukei d'zimra.
24Orchos Tzadikkim: Sha'ar HaTorah
25Devarim 30:12
26This is why even when there is indeed a machlokes, there is also a concept of eilu v'eilu divrei Elokim Chaim – Both this opinion and that opinion are from the word of Hashem. For example, see Gemara Gittin 7b. After all, if both conclusions were made based on the emes of Torah, it must be that both are indeed completely accurate.
27We recite this after 'Modim' in Shemoneh Esreh as well as after 'Nodeh' in bentching.
28See Rashi Bamidbar 19:1
29See Shulchan Aruch - Orach Chaim 671:1 and Mishna Berura 3

30Pirkei Avos 3:18

Friday, November 22, 2013

Parshas Vayeishev - For Heaven's Sake: 50-50 = 80-20

Parshas Vayeishev




For Heaven's Sake:
50-50 = 80-20
By: Daniel Listhaus

וַיַּכֵּר יְהוּדָה וַיֹּאמֶר צָדְקָה מִמֶּנִּי כִּי עַל כֵּן לֹא נְתַתִּיהָ לְשֵׁלָה בְנִי וְלֹא יָסַף עוֹד לְדַעְתָּהּ

Yehuda recognized; and he said, 'She is right; it is from me, inasmuch as I did not giver her to Sheilah my son,' and he did not continue to be intimate with her anymore.”
-Vayeishev 38:26


Throughout the Torah, there are many examples of seemingly horrible things that people – even tzadikkim (righteous people) have done, which were claimed wholeheartedly to have been done completely l'sheim shamayim (literally: for Heaven's [Hashem's] sake). Many of these events and actions resulted in tremendous world-changing consequences.1 In this week's parsha too there are a few famous examples.

The parsha opens with a look into, what appears to be, the dysfunctional house of Yaakov avinu. Yosef would tattle-tale on his brothers,2 Yaakov loved Yosef and showed his affection openly by giving him more than his brothers,3 and Yosef did things that would instigate his brothers' anger – such as telling them his dreams.4 As we know, this three-way relationship complex was just the exciting start of the lives of B'nei Yisroel which caries through the end of sefer Beraishis. However, let us look at some of the events in this week's parsha for some examples of people doing the right thing for the wrong reason, and people who did the wrong thing for the right reason.

The story of the brothers throwing Yosef into the pit is something which is beyond our comprehension. They were not average people with typical sibling rivalry, Rather they were mature tzadikkim who were collectively destined to father the Jewish Nation. Yosef was already in is upper teen years at the time and the shevatim involved in throwing him into the pit (all of them besides for Binyamin) were all older than him. The Torah5 describes that originally the brothers actually wanted to kill Yosef, but Reuvein heard saved Yosef by suggesting that they just throw him into a pit. After they did so, the Torah tells us that the brothers did not regret their actions one iota. In fact, they sat down to eat. The S'forno6 points this out explicitly, that the brothers were so sure that they were doing the right thing that it did not bother them to have wanted to kill Yosef, because they felt that was the correct thing to do, and it certainly did not bother them to throw him into a pit of scorpions and snakes. After all, they deemed Yosef to be a rodeif (killer) and it was their obligation to see to it that he be killed first before any damage was done. The brothers formed a beis din, and with certainty they sentenced Yosef to death.
Clearly here we have an example of the shevatim doing a completely wrong thing but seemingly with only good intentions. They were not trying to do anything against halacha (law). Rather, they really felt with a clean conscience that killing Yosef was the right thing to do.

As aforementioned, Reuvein talked the brothers out of it and suggested that merely throwing Yosef into a pit would accomplish their goal just the same. The brothers acquiesced and they threw Yosef into a pit of snakes and scorpions. However, the insight that Rashi gives us into the thought process of Reuvein is quite interesting. Rashi7 writes that Reuvein said to himself the following: “I am the firstborn and the most prominent among all the brothers. The foulness will be hung upon none but me.” We would have thought that Reuvein perhaps realized their mistake but knew he would not be able to convince the brothers to change their minds completely so instead he suggested this less extreme alternative and figured he would be able to save Yosef later by rescuing him from the pit. However, Rashi seems to describe Reuvein's thoughts as him being more concerned for getting the brunt of the blame later on, than he was of Yosef's well-being. Here we have an example of someone doing a good thing but with not as good intentions.

There is a Gemara8 which quotes a fascinating statement by R' Nachman bar Yitzchak: Doing an aveira (sin) l'shmah (with the right intentions for the sake of Hashem) is greater than doing a mitzva she'lo l'shmah (for one's own sake, not for the sake of Hashem). The Gemara asks on this: how can such a statement be true? After all, there is a famous concept of “mee'toch she'lo l'shmah, ba l'shmah”. This literally means that if one involves oneself in doing mitzvos, even for the wrong reasons, such as out of selfishness or ulterior motives, one will eventually come to do the mitzvos for the right reason.

The truth is though that even this question needs to be qualified. R' Eliyahu Dessler, in his sefer Michtav Me'Eliyahu9, explains that mitzvos could be performed on a variety of levels. The highest level is doing a mitzva purely l'shmah – solely because Hashem commanded to do the mitzva and you want to carry out the word of Hashem. The level under that is doing a mitzva she'lo l'shmah but with a small spark inside you that you want to do things for the right reason. This itself could take many forms. Some of us may do things for the wrong reasons but wish we could do it like someone else who we recognize does things with the correct intentions. Some of us do things but wish secretly inside that we be able to do it for the right reasons and not just go with the flow. And for others perhaps it is a sense of guilt that comes afterwards when we realize that we used a mitzva for selfish reasons or to boost ourselves. However, on this level there is still hope and that little spark – whether it is to want to do good or to want to want to do good – is all that is needed for chazal to be confident to say “keep doing what you are doing because what you are doing she'lo l'shma now will ultimately lead to doing mitzvos l'shmah and retroactively, it will have all been worth it.” However, the lowest level of performing a mitzva is one who does a mitzva without even this miniscule 'nekudas l'shma'. Such a mitzva is not a mitzva in the eyes of Hashem and the person's actions, although they look good, are not good at all and nothing good will come of it.

Going back to the Gemara, the Gemara's question seems like a good one. How could it even enter one's mind to say that doing an aveira l'shmah is better than a mitzva she'lo l'shma? First, in one case you are doing a mitzva and in the other you are doing an aveirah? Second, a mitzva she'lo l'shmah could lead to a mitzva l'shmah, as we see from R' Dessler's explanation, but it would seem that someone doing an aveirah l'shma is hopeless. Such a person thinks he is doing completely the right thing with only good intentions in mind! So how could it be that an aveirah l'shmah be better than a mitzva she'lo l'shma?

The Gemara's answer though is just as surprising as its hava amina (original premise). The Gemara answers, granted, of course an aveirah l'shmah is not greater than a mitzva she'lo l'shma; but it is not less either, they are equal! The Gemara's answer is difficult to understand. How could they be equal? Being equal implies that they are equidistant from doing the purely correct thing and that it would take similar efforts to correct the mistake and reach higher. How could we comprehend this?

The Chovos Ha'levavos10 writes that there are really two elements to doing mitzvos. One factor is what he terms the chovos ha'eivarim (literally: duties of the limbs)referring to the physical obligations we have to do: Put on tefillin, place a mezuzah on our doorposts, eat matza, shake lulav, etc. The second factor is what he calls the chovos ha'levavos (the duties of the heart) – referring to the necessity to do things with the right intentions in mind. Are you shaking the lulav because you do not want to look like an outcast in shul and really you are secretly thinking that it is one of the weirdest things you have ever done and wasted your money on? Or are you shaking the lulav because you appreciate the value of carrying out a mitzva – a direct commandment from Hashem – and whether you are on the level of understanding the purpose or not you will do it with a smile on your face? Often times we are challenged with this expression of Pareto's principle. Pareto's principle, more commonly known as the 80-20 rule, states that in many cases, 80% of effects come from 20% of their causes. This principle has been applied to many aspects of life from peas coming from pea pods to wealth distribution in a given economy. Similarly, when it comes to mitzvos, one could go through the motions of purchasing tefillin, lulav, and mezuzos and be sure to use them appropriately at their respective times and in their respective ways. However, it is the intention – that remaining 20% which is missing which is such a vital element of the mitzva and will no doubt require 80% of the effort, in terms of working on oneself to do the mitzva fully.

If we stop for a moment and analyze what an aveirah l'shmah is, we will find that it is exactly the opposite. In such a case, the person has accomplished the mindset and intention aspect (i.e. - the chovos ha'levavos), but is lacking on doing the correct course of action (i.e. - the chovos ha'eivarim). In this scenario too the person has worked hard and developed his ahavas (love for) and yiras (fear of) Hashem, but it is the last 20% - in his case the doing the right actions – which will take 80% of his effort to somehow convince himself that what he thinks he is doing for the right reasons is in fact the wrong thing to do.

Perhaps we could now understand how in a sense doing a mitzva she'lo l'shma and an aveirah l'shmah are equidistant from doing the perfect mitzva l'shma. However, although we could understand the path one must take to go from mitzva she'lo l'shma to mitzva l'shmah, how is it that one goes from doing aveiros l'shma to doing mitzvos l'shmah?

Later on in the parsha, we find the episode of Yehuda and Tamar; a story which is very hard to comprehend. However, leaving aside the reasons and intentions for a moment, the structure of the story is that Yehuda was told that Tamar (Yehuda's daughter in law, the wife of his dead son) was pregnant. Yehuda, not realizing that it was he who made her pregnant, responded she is subject to the death penalty of s'reifah (burning).11 The Torah tells us that as she was being taken out to be burned, she sent a package to Yehuda with his signet, wrap, and staff in it with a message that she had become pregnant by the person who the objects had belonged to. Rashi12 explains that Tamar did not want to declare explicitly that she had become pregnant from Yehuda because she did not want to embarrass him publicly.13 Yehuda had the choice to play dumb and pretend he had no idea who the objects belonged to, but to his incredible credit, he stepped forward and exclaimed, “tzadkah me'meh'nee”; admitting two things: One, that Tamar was righteous and two, that the pregnancy was from him.14

Perhaps it is this expression which is the answer as to how one fixes a position of doing aveiros l'shma. When it comes to correcting mitzvos she'lo l'shma, our task is to work on our ahavas and yiras Hashem; but when it comes to correcting aveiros l'shma those elements are already there. Instead, in such a case our job is to stop and be completely honest with ourselves if our actions are really lining up properly with our thoughts and intentions, or if there is an outside factor with is obscuring our vision and making aveiros look like mitzvos.

Challenges come in many different forms. Sometimes we are challenged with mitzvos which are easy to do in practice, but hard to do for the right reasons, and other times we are faced with aveiros which look to us like mitzvos and we already have the proper intentions and want to go forward full force in doing the aveirah. The trick is to stop, think, and identify each scenario in order to understand the approach that must be taken. Is it an area which needs chizuk (strengthening) of emunah in Hashem and a love for His mitzvos, or is it an area which requires an intellectually honest analysis.

May Hashem help us accomplish the two halves of every mitzva – the chovos ha'eivarim element as well as the chovos ha'levavos aspect, and help us be honest with ourselves in order to identify which part is our “80” and which is our “20” so that we could all achieve the purest level of doing mitzvos l'shmah.



1For example, see Beraishis 19:30-38 and Rashi there.
2See Beraishis 37:2 and Rashi there.
3See Beraishis 37:3 and Rashi there.
4Beraishis 37:5, 37:9, and 37:10
5Beraishis 37:20
6S'forno Beraishis 37:25
7Rashi Beraishis 37:22
8Nazir 23b
9See Michtav Me'Eliyahu cheilek gimmel pg. 115, 118, and 334 (pages may vary by edition)
10See Hakdama (introduction) to Chovos Halevavos by Rabbi Bachya ibn Pakuda.
11See Rashi Beraishis 38:24
12Rashi Beraishis 38:25
13See Gemara Sotah 10b

14See Rashi and Ramban Beraishis 38:26