Thursday, May 29, 2014

Parshas Nasso (5774) - You Can Run But You Can't Hide

Thoughts on The Parsha
Parshas Nasso



You Can Run But You Can't Hide
By: Daniel Listhaus
וַיְדַבֵּר ה' אֶל משֶׁה לֵּאמֹר: דַּבֵּר אֶל בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְאָמַרְתָּ אֲלֵהֶם אִישׁ אִישׁ כִּי תִשְׂטֶה אִשְׁתּוֹ וּמָעֲלָה בוֹ מָעַל: וְשָׁכַב אִישׁ אֹתָהּ שִׁכְבַת זֶרַע וְנֶעְלַם מֵעֵינֵי אִישָׁהּ וְנִסְתְּרָה וְהִיא נִטְמָאָה וְעֵד אֵין בָּהּ וְהִוא לֹא נִתְפָּשָׂה

“Hashem spoke to Moshe, saying, “Speak to the B'nei Yisroel and say to them: Any man, if his wife will go astray and commit a trespass against him; and a man will have lain with her carnally, but it was hidden from the eyes of her husband, and she became secluded and she was defiled – but there was no witness against her – and she had not been seized...”
-Nasso 5:11-13

Our parsha deals with the topic of sotah – the women suspected of meeting another man, who is then warned and then later caught again being secluded with him. Despite the usual stance of “innocent until proven guilty”, the Torah demands that this woman go through a difficult process which first tries to get her to admit if in fact she is guilty and if that does not work she is given the bitter waters to drink from. The sotah waters only have a fatal affect if in fact the woman is guilty, if she is innocent then not only will the waters not harm her, but she is actually given a beracha (blessing) to have children.

Amongst the various details of the sotah, Rashi1 comments that a sotah's lying with another man renders her unfit to her husband, whereas a man who lays with another woman, even his wife's sister, is still permitted to his wife. Rashi then continues and writes, “Like the incident of two sisters who resembled each other...”

According to many m'forshim (commentaries), this last line of Rashi was an editorial mistake and placed there by accident, as it has nothing to do with the first part of the Rashi. However, regardless, the incident being referred to is one worthwhile to reflect on.

The Medrash2 relates that there was once two sisters who looked very much alike. One was married to a certain person in one town, and the other was married to a certain fellow in a different town. One of the sister's husbands suspected her (his wife) of being with another man, so he warned her and wanted to take her to the Beis Hamikdash in Yerushalayim to make her drink the sotah-water. However, before he had a chance to do so she ran away to her sister's house . Her sister asked her why she came so suddenly and she explained to her that her husband wanted her to drink the sotah water but that she did not want to. Her sister understood that if she was so worried about drinking the sotah water, she must be guilty so she offered that since they looked extremely similar, they swap places, and that she will drink the sotah water instead of her. Indeed, they went through with their plan and the sister dressed in her clothes and went to drink from the sotah water, which of course had no affect because she was in fact innocent. They were so happy that their plan had worked that they got together and hugged and kissed each other on the mouth. When they kissed, the guilty sister smelled the sotah water and died instantly. The medrash then continues and states that this fulfills that which Shlomo HaMelech wrote in Koheles3, “Man is not in control of the wind, to be able to confine the wind, and he has no authority on the day of death. There is no substitution in war, nor does evil escape him to whom it belongs.”

Oftentimes we find ourselves doing things with the thought, “I hope I do not get caught”. Sometimes it is mere hope, and other times sophisticated schemes are devised to cover up any evidence. However, when it comes to doing things we should not be doing we must take a moment to consider who it is we are trying to fool. The plan of the two sisters sounded perfect to them – identical twins switching places in order for the innocent one to be the one who drinks the sotah water, thereby saving her sister's life. However, the one thing they forgot to take into account was who it was they were trying to outsmart. They may have pulled the wool over the guilty sister's husband's eyes, but they failed to remember that one cannot outsmart G-d.

As humans, we are limited to our own intelligence. Therefore, by definition, everything we think is only through our own brains. For example, sometimes your brain registers others' body language or behavior and interprets it based on what it knows would cause you to act in such a way. Even the most emotionally intelligent people are biased with their own life experiences, habits, and behaviors. As the gemara4 says, “One who declares others unfit, is himself unfit.” However a bigger mistake than failing to recognize this is to actually go so far as to limit G-d to our own intelligence and subconsciously assume to ourselves: “I could outsmart Hashem because if I were G-d I would fall for this trick.” This was the mistake of identical sisters. Their plan seemed fool-proof and would have worked had it not been Hashem – the controller of the entire world – that they were ultimately trying to fool. When it comes to trying to fool Hashem, you could try to run but you certainly cannot hide. If one is meant to die, he will. If one is meant to end up in a certain circumstance, he will. The one Hashem wants to reward will be rewarded, and the one Hashem wants to punish will be punished no matter what. As it says in Mishlei5, and we recite every morning in davening: Rabos machshavos b'leiv ish, va'atzas Hashem hee sakum – There are many designs in the heart of man, but it is only the counsel of Hashem which prevails.

The mishna6 states, “Consider three things and you will not come to sin: Know what is above you – an observant eye, and an attentive ear, and all your deeds are recorded in a book.” Upon reading this mishna, a question immediately comes to mind. Why does the mishna have to list the three items? Just write, “Know what is above you”, and people reading the mishna will understand that it refers to Hashem who knows the past, present, and future, and will reward and punish accordingly?
The mishna7, continuing its discussion of the laws and details of the ben soreir u'moreh (wayward and rebellious son) – the child who gets used to overindulging in meat and wine. Describes certain situations where despite the child doing everything that would make him a ben soreir u'moreh, he will not become one due to the type of meal he was partaking in. The gemara8 which follows comments that one could only be deemed a ben soreir u'moreh if he is in company of bums. If however, there would be even one proper person of standards present, then the child's actions will not be perceived as habitual and the halacha would not categorize him as a ben soreir u'moreh. Being in the company of people with higher standards and morals has an incredible impact on the way one acts because it causes one to be much more conscious of what he is doing.

Similar to this idea, Rabbeinu Yonah offers the following answer to the question on the mishna in Pirkei Avos. He writes that things lose meaning once you begin to drop a description for a title or category instead. Certainly the mishna could have said, “Remember Hashem is above you”, but unfortunately that just does not send the chill down our spines. We say to ourselves, “Okay, I'll remember that”, and then go right ahead and rationalize how we would be able to explain our various actions to Hashem because after all – if we were G-d and we had to rationalize to ourselves, we would accept such arguments and let ourselves off the hook. Therefore, explains Rabbinu Yonah, the mishna chose to provide details: Hashem is omnipresent and is watching and listening to everything we do, say, and think. Not only that, but He never forgets – as if written down.

There is no doubt that this is a fundamental belief and must be the foundation of our every day lives. It is no wonder that the Rama inserts into the first halacha of Shulchan Aruch9 what Dovid HaMelech writes in Tehillim10, which captures this idea: “Shivisi Hashem l'negdi samid...” (“I have set Hashem before me always...”)

May Hashem help us not fall so often into the trap of assuming Hashem is limited, chas v'shalom, to our own level of intelligence and then thinking we could outsmart G-d just because we could outsmart ourselves.
1Rashi Bamidbar 5:13
2Medrash Tanchuma 6 as well as Yalkut Shimoni Koheles 8
3Koheles 8:8
4Kiddushin 70a
5Mishlei 19:21
6Pirkei Avos 2:1
7Sanhedrin 70a
8Ibid. 70b
9Orach Chaim 1:1

10Tehillim 16:8

Photo Credit: Edited picture based on sherimackey.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Slide11-e1393091354133.jpg

Friday, May 2, 2014

Parshas Emor - Passive Peace? I'm a Frayed Knot

Thoughts on The Parsha
Parshas Emor



Passive Peace? I'm a Frayed Knot
By: Daniel Listhaus

וַיֹּאמֶר ה' אֶל משֶׁה אֱמֹר אֶל הַכֹּהֲנִים בְּנֵי אַהֲרֹן וְאָמַרְתָּ אֲלֵהֶם לְנֶפֶשׁ לֹא יִטַּמָּא בְּעַמָּיו

“Hashem said to Moshe: Say to the kohanim, the sons of Aharon, and you shall say to them: to a dead person he should not become impure among his people...”
-Emor 21:1

וַיֵּצֵא בֶּן אִשָּׁה יִשְׂרְאֵלִית וְהוּא בֶּן אִישׁ מִצְרִי בְּתוֹךְ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וַיִּנָּצוּ בַּמַּחֲנֶה בֶּן הַיִּשְׂרְאֵלִית וְאִישׁ הַיִּשְׂרְאֵלִי: : וַיִּקֹּב בֶּן הָאִשָּׁה הַיִּשְׂרְאֵלִית אֶת הַשֵּׁם וַיְקַלֵּל וַיָּבִיאוּ אֹתוֹ אֶל משֶׁה וְשֵׁם אִמּוֹ שְׁלֹמִית בַּת דִּבְרִי לְמַטֵּה דָן: : וַיַּנִּיחֻהוּ בַּמִּשְׁמָר לִפְרשׁ לָהֶם עַל פִּי ה': : וַיְדַבֵּר ה' אֶל משֶׁה לֵּאמֹר: :הוֹצֵא אֶת הַמְקַלֵּל אֶל מִחוּץ לַמַּחֲנֶה וְסָמְכוּ כָל הַשֹּׁמְעִים אֶת יְדֵיהֶם עַל רֹאשׁוֹ וְרָגְמוּ אֹתוֹ כָּל הָעֵדָה: וְאֶל בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל תְּדַבֵּר לֵאמֹר אִישׁ אִישׁ כִּי יְקַלֵּל אֱלֹקיו וְנָשָׂא חֶטְאוֹ: וְנֹקֵב שֵׁם ה' מוֹת יוּמָת רָגוֹם יִרְגְּמוּ בוֹ כָּל הָעֵדָה כַּגֵּר כָּאֶזְרָח בְּנָקְבוֹ שֵׁם יוּמָת

The son of an Israelite woman went out – and he was the son of an Egyptian man – among the Children of Israel and they contended in the camp, the son of the Israelite woman and the Israelite man. The son of the Israelite woman pronounced the Name and blasphemed – so they brought him to Moshe; the name of his mother was Shelomis the daughter of Dibri, of the tribe of Dan. They placed him under guard to clarify for them through Hashem. Hashem spoke to Moshe, saying: Remove the blasphemer to the outside of the camp, and all those who heard shall lean their hands upon his head: The entire assembly shall stone him. And to the Children of Israel you shall speak, saying: Any man who will blaspheme his G-d shall bear his sin; and one who pronounces blasphemously the Name of Hashem shall be put to death, the entire assembly shall surely pelt him with stones; proselyte and native alike, when he blasphemes the Name, he shall be put to death.
-Emor 24:10-16

The Ibn Ezra1 and the Chizkuni2 write that after commanding all of B'nei Yisroel to be kedoshim (holy) in last week's parsha, the Torah now stresses the extra kedusha that the kohanim have and the restrictions necessary to protect this kedusha. After all the kohanim are privileged with being the servants of Hashem's house. However, as the Kli Yakar3 points out, this has nothing to do with the merits of the kohanim, but rather that of Aharon HaKohen himself. Aharon was the chosen kohen gadol to Hashem. His descendents merited to inherit his kedusha and role, but it is Aharon HaKohen who contains the mekor hakedusha (source of that holiness).

What was so special about Aharon that he merited to be the source of such kedusha and have the zechus (merit) to pass the role on to his children?

Truthfully, Aharon was not first pick to be kohen. Really, it was supposed to go to Moshe; however when Hashem originally told Moshe that he was to be his chosen messenger to communicate to Pharaoh, Moshe refused and said that it should be given to Aharon since Aharon was currently acting as leader for B'nei Yisroel and was Moshe's older brother. The Torah4 tells us that Hashem was quite upset with Moshe's reluctance and in turn, as Rashi5 explains, took the kehuna away from Moshe and gave it to Aharon.
At first glance the story seems difficult to understand. Why should Moshe's humility and respect for his older brother be a reason to lose kehuna? The answer must be that there is a time to be hesitant and worry about everyone who will be effected and there are times where one is expected to just grab the bull by the horns. The role of kehuna requires a perfect balance of being someone who more than represents peace but is someone who runs after it, and at the same time being someone who represents the ultimate truth of the Torah. During the conversation between Hashem and Moshe, Hashem sensed some flaw in this delicate balance and therefore took away kehuna from Moshe and gifted it to Aharon, who better represented the perfect middah (trait) of knowing when to pursue shalom (peace) and the middah of being jealous for Hashem, so to speak, in standing up for the truth of Torah. Indeed, Hillel taught in Pirkei Avos6, “Be among the disciples of Aharon: Love peace and pursue peace, love people and bring them closer to Torah”. As a master of peace, pursuer of peace, and one who knew when peace was appropriate, Aharon was chosen to be the kohen gadol and source of the special kedusha that comes with it. Demonstrating kavod (respect) for others is of utmost importance. In fact, the Gemara7 tells a story of a certain goy who came to Hillel wanting to convert on condition that Hillel could teach him the whole Torah while he stands on one foot. Hillel responded - “That which you find hateful do not do to your friend.” Essentially, the axiom of V'ahavta l'rayacha kamocha” - treating a fellow person with kavod is the foundation of the entire Torah.

The general rule of always caring for others is, for the most part, objectively true as is the concept of running away from personal honor. In the same passuk8 of Hashem being angry with Moshe for inappropriately thinking of the feelings of Aharon at a time he should have just accepted the role being given to him by Hashem, we find that the Torah praises Aharon for coming to greet Moshe with happiness that Moshe was chosen as leader for B'nei Yisroel. Running away from personal kavod to give honor to others is an incredible trait. As the Gemara9 states, “One who runs after greatness, greatness runs away from him; but one who runs away from greatness, greatness seeks after him.” However, when Moshe rabbeinu lost his kehuna, he learned that as is the case by all middos, there are some exceptions to the general rule.

Later in our parsha10 we find the story of the mekalel (the one who cursed Hashem's Name). This shameful story also has its roots in improper respect. The mekalel in our parsha is someone's whose history we actually know quite a bit about. The Torah refers to him as the son of an Israelite woman whose name Shelomis bas Dibri. Rashi11 comments that the reason her name was Shelomis was because she would walk around chattering saying “Shalom alach” (literally: peace unto you). Although it sounds like she was a very nice lady, the Torah seems to hold her actions responsible for what happened to her with a certain incident in Mitzrayim years before.

The Torah12 testifies that despite growing up in the royal palace of Pharaoh, Moshe had his heart alongside his brothers slaving in the fields of Mitzrayim. One day, Moshe witnessed an Egyptian man striking one of the Jewish taskmasters named Dasan. Rashi13 informs us the reason the Mitzri was whipping Dasan was because in the middle of the night the Mitzri woke Dasan and told him he had to leave his house at once to continue the task at hand. When Dasan left, the Mitzri went to his house, pretending to be Dasan himself, and tricked Dasan's wife, Shelomis bas Dibri, and had relations with her. Dasan returned home home later on and realized the Mitzri's disgusting scheme. When the Egyptian sensed that Dasan had found out, he began hitting him and threatening him and taunting him throughout the next day. Moshe rabbeinu saw this and could not sit back while one of his brothers was being beaten up. So, the passuk (verse)14 describes that Moshe killed the Egyptian and buried him in the sand.

Why was it that the Mitzri chose Shelomis bas Dibri? It was precisely because her saying shalom to everyone was improper. Whether it was improper because she was being excessively talkative to other men or whether it was improper because she had selfish hopes or intentions by doing so, the kavod she gave to others in this particular way was wrong and because of it, as Rashi15 explains, the Torah considered her a zonah. Although on quite a different level and in a very different way, Shelomis, like Moshe rabbeinu, misused kavod and gave it at an improper time.

As mentioned, the mekalel in our parsha was the mamzer child of Shelomis bas Diri and the Mitzri. The Torah16 does not give much detail other than that there was some type of fight in the camp of B'nei Yisorel which resulted in the mamzer cursing Hashem's Name. However, Rashi17 cites a medrash18 which fills in all the blanks.

This child of Shelomis bas Dibri decided that since his mother was from shevet Dan, he had the right to pitch his tent with shevet Dan. He did so and soon afterward the members of shevet Dan approached him and told him that the rights to land goes based on the father's shevet. Since his father was a Mitzri, he had no right to occupy shevet Dan property despite the fact that his mother was from that particular shevet. This started a whole argument and resulted in being brought to the beis din (court) of Moshe where the mamzer son of Shelomis bas Dibri lost the case. The Da'as Zekainim19 writes that at some point while arguing, the members of shevet Dan taunted the son of Shelomis bas Dibri saying that Moshe had killed his father. He asked how he killed him and they responded that it was with Hashem's Holy Name. He then got up and cursed that Name of Hashem.

The Torah20 continues its narrative of this horrible episode illustrating that Moshe was unsure what to do with the mekalel. So, he imprisoned him and waited until Hashem clarified that his punishment was to be the death penalty via stoning.

The Rosh21 asks that on the surface, it is difficult to understand what Moshe was doubtful about. After all, even though it may be true that the punishment for someone who curses Hashem's Name was never explicitly stated, still Moshe should have known that the mekalel be chayav meesah (deserving of the death penalty) from a simple kal v'chomeir: We know that one who curses his parents gets put to death22, so certainly how much more so should one who curses Hashem be put to death! If so what was Moshe so unsure about?

The Rosh answers that certainly Moshe rabbeinu knew that the mekalel would be chayav meesah. What dumbfounded him was which death penalty to give him. After all, if the worst form of death, s'kilah (stoning),23 was for one who curses his parents, what death penalty could there possibly be that would somehow be worse than s'kilah in order to be a befitting punishment for a perpetrator of such a crime and a possible kaparah (atonement) for such a person? This is what stumped Moshe rabbeinu.

Hashem's response, however, was not that he deserves some extremely cruel and excruciatingly painful death, but rather that one who is mekalel shem Hashem deserves the meesah of s'kilah just like one who curses his own parents. The Rosh points out that we see from here the incredible humility Hashem has and how incredibly serious He takes the kavod of people. When we hear of someone else's undeserved degradation, it may upset it but nothing in comparison to how we would react if it were being said about us personally. We do not feel the pain of others and certainly not to the same extent as we would for ourselves. However, Hashem is not as haughty as us humans. Hashem, Who is the Creator and Director of the entire world takes the kavod of people so serious that the punishment for one who curses Hashem Himself need be no worse than the one given to one who curses his parents.

We find this idea in so many divrei chazal and practice so many minhagim (customs) and halachos (laws) which allude to going the extra mile to properly protect the kavod of others. One such example could be seen in Birkas Kohanim. The Shulchan Aruch24 states that when the kohanim go up to duchan (recite Birkas Kohanim), they should not go up with their shoes on. The Mishna Berurah25 explains, based on the Gemara26, that the reason is as follows. If we would allow the kohanim to go up and duchan with their shoes on, it may occur that one of their shoelaces becomes untied and out of embarrassment of having an untied shoelace, the kohen may bend down to tie his shoe while the other kohanim are reciting the beracha (blessing). An onlooker may then come to say that this kohen is bending down and faking to tie his shoelace because really he is a ben-gerusha or ben-chalutza (a kohen who is the son of a kohen who married a divorced woman or a woman who had performed chalitza), and therefore not permitted to recite Birkas Kohanim.
Take a moment to think about how far the Torah goes to protect the kavod of an individual. For thousands of years kohanim have had to take their shoes off before duchan-ing, all in order to protect against the hypothetical possibility of an embarrassing loose shoelace which could ultimately lead to a kohen's debasement. This is the level of kavod and concern the Torah has for us and this is the level of kavod and concern that we are expected to demonstrate towards each other.

In this week's parsha we find the mitzva of Sefiras Ha'omer27 which is the time period we are currently in between Pesach and Shavuos. The Gemara28 tells us that it was during this time period that the 12,000 pairs of talmidim (students) of Rabbi Akiva died because they did not act with kavod with each other. Now, we must consider the fact that Rabbi Akiva's talmidim were not immature school children. Rather, they were outstanding individuals who certainly were not physically or verbally abusing each other nor were they treating each other improperly. Yet, there was still something lacking. They did did not actively give kavod to each other. They all learned in the same yeshiva and all attended the same minyanim and shiurim, yet their closeness was one of body, not of spirit. Perhaps when they passed each other they did not say hello, or perhaps they just did not go out of their ways to ask how others were doing. Either way, something was lacking in their kavod to each other and therefore they could not be the ones selected to continue the mesorah (tradition) to the next generation. Imagine how different our nation would look today if those 24,000 talmidim would have lived to be the next generation's rabbeim! The Orchos Tzadikkim29 writes that a person learning Torah could be compared to filling up a barrel with wine. However, no matter how high the quality of this wine, if there is a whole in th ebarrel, it will all leak out. So too if people have a hole in their barrel of proper middos, the quality of the learning itself is misleading because it will all leak out. These talmidim had the best wine available, but they were missing not only an essential part of the Torah, but its single prerequisite: Derech Eretz for each other – the barrel necessary to contain their Torah.

In the late 1700's, a person known as Blaj, invented the first aglet. An aglet is the small plastic peace at the end of shoelaces to keep the fibers from separating and fraying. The physical closeness of the individual fibers that the shoelace is comprised of is not enough to stop them from separating. Rather, additional reinforcement is necessary to keep them as one. So too when we think about our levels of shalom and kavod with and for others we must keep in mind that we have to be rodeif shalom (run to peace) and bore'ach mei'gedulah (run away from our own greatness [and instead honor others]). That is our aglet to reinforce the physical closeness and make it a real one of spirit as well.

This is precisely our avodah to work on during the y'mei sefirah (days of sefirah). We are tasked to work on kavod habriyos in order to properly prepare ourselves to be complete keilim (vessels) to be able to contain the Torah we receive on Shavuos. This is why there is a minhag to go through Pirkei Avos during these weeks. We focus on the fact that middos and derech eretz to others is just as much part of Torah as any other halacha, and even more so – they are prerequisites.




May Hashem help us during these weeks of sefira to work on v'ahavta l'rayacha ka'mo'cha and giving




 proper kavod to others by running away from our own honor and instead pursuing peace. After all, ask any 






talking shoelace if it could imagine what it would be like in the long run without the reinforcement of an aglet 






holding the strands together constantly, and it will most definitely respond: I'm a frayed knot.







1Vayikra 21:1
2Ibid.
3Ibid. (in his first approach)
4Shemos 4:14
5Rashi ibid.
6Pirkei Avos 1:12
7Gemara Shabbos 31a
8Shemos 4:14
9Gemara Eiruvin 13b
10Vayikra 24:10
11Rashi Vayikra 24:11
12Shemos 2:11
13Rashi ibid.
14Shemos 2:12
15Rashi Vayikra 24:11
16Vayikra 24:10
17Rashi ibid.
18Vayikra Rabbah 32:3
19Vayikra 24:10
20Vayikra 24:12
21Ibid.
22See Vayikra 20:9
23See mishna Sanhedrin 49b. This is the opinion of the Rabbanan
24Orach Chaim 128:5
25Ibid. 128:5:15
26See Gemara Rosh Hashanah 31b and Gemara Sotah 40a
27Vayikra 23:15
28Yevamos 62b

29See Introduction to Orchos Tzadikkim.
Photo Credit: http://softballjunk.com/store/Featured%20Sections/The%20Pink%20Room/Item:Show:Ultra-Fat%20Shoelaces