Friday, May 10, 2013

Parshas Bamidbar - Mind Over Matter

Thoughts on The Parsha
Parshas Bamidbar



Mind Over Matter
By: Daniel Listhaus

זֹאת עֲבֹדַת בְּנֵי קְהָת בְּאֹהֶל מוֹעֵד קֹדֶשׁ הַקֳּדָשִׁים

“This is the work of the sons of Kehas in the Tent of Meeting: the most Holy.”

אַל תַּכְרִיתוּ אֶת שֵׁבֶט מִשְׁפְּחֹת הַקְּהָתִי מִתּוֹךְ הַלְוִיִּם

Do not cut off the tribe of the Kehas families from among the Levi'im.”
-Bamidbar 4:4;18

After having counted B'nei Yisroel and describing the positioning of the the B'nei Yisroel around the aron (ark) in the midbar (desert), the Torah continues to relate the tasks of the Levi'im. As the cloud and fire representing the shechina of Hashem traveled, the B'nei Yisroel followed. There was no itinerary that they knew of which outlined how their time in the midbar would be spent. The B'nei Yisroel never knew if they would be pitching tent for the night, week, or month. If this itself did not display a true devotion to Hashem, then certainly the fact that every time they moved, the mishkan had to be taken apart and brought with them to reconstruct at their new location, did. The passuk (verse) in our parsha states that the descendents of Kehas from Levi had the greatest responsibility. They were charged with carrying the Holliest keilim (vessels) – the aron, the shulchan (table), the menorah, the two mizbe'achs (alters), the paroches (curtain partition), and the k'lei shareis (utensils of sacrificial service).

The Medrash1 says that it was known to those carrying the various keilim of the mishkan that the individuals who would be privileged with carrying the aron would be rewarded tremendously. So, they would all fight over who would get to carry the aron. Each person would be standing over the aron shouting, “I called it” like a kid racing for the front seat of a car. This led to kalos rosh (light-headedness) and a big chillul Hashem.

The ironic thing is, however, that of course if you would ask any member of the crowd arguing for the opportunity of carrying the aron why he was doing such a thing, he would without a doubt respond that he is showing kavod haTorah (honoring the Torah) by fighting for the chance of carrying the aron of Hashem containing the luchos. If this is not worth fighting for, what is? Yet, Hashem obviously viewed the situation quite differently. He commanded Moshe and Aharon to secure the position for Kehas by setting rules as to who is in charge of each keili in order to ensure that no one would die as a result of improperly fooling around the aron.

The obvious question on this Medrash is what exactly went wrong. Indeed those who were fighting to carry the aron had only the best intentions in mind. How could so many people make such a big mistake that instead of showing kavod haTorah, exhibit kalos rosh and b'zayon haTorah without even realizing?

In order to understand their psyche, we must be willing to admit to a fault into which many people fall. Often times, we start a project with the right intentions however, as issues come up and others perhaps disagree with the way we want to carry out the project, we could get so carried away trying to back up our side and show that we are right that we lose focus of the bigger picture. We become biased and so emotionally attached to our opinions to even realize that we have ceased to think rationally.

In the 1950's, France, England, the United States and the Soviet Union were each thinking of creating a supersonic airplane. France and England eventually joined together and both governments invested a tremendous amount of money developing what would be later known as the Concorde. The Concorde got its name as being a word which in both French and English means “in agreement”. The interesting thing about the lifespan of the Concorde is that each year proved to be a complete failure. Whether it was unforeseen costs, issue in construction, or unrealistic plans to make a profit, the Concorde project was a constant headache that all around did more harm than good. Yet, both governments were extremely stubborn and had become so emotionally attached to their project that they were unwilling to let it go for a very long time. If one would have asked during the early years of the Concorde's development why they were doing it, the response would have been that they were trying to drive the economy. Jobs were created and the government was investing a lot of money into it, obviously hoping to get back a substantial amount to make it worth the risk. So why is it then when these seemingly rational people were asked this exact question years down the road after putting effort into the project did they say that granted they saw that their cause was failing but they wanted to continue anyway? The answer is that they fell into the trap of what, thanks to them, is now known as the Concorde Fallacy. They became so emotionally attached to what they were doing that their opinions, perspectives, and future projections of the project were all falsified based on their unwillingness to think rationally and keep in mind what the objective purpose was – to generate a profit.

This is something that is part of human nature and effects each of us whether we realize it or not. We often allow our decisions to be emotionally driven and in turn the real purpose of what we were trying to accomplish falls by the wayside. This is exactly what happened with the Levi'im in the midbar. They were so emotionally attached with a desire to carry the aron – a feeling which originally came from the right place but was taken too far – that they lost sight that their real inner desire was and should have continued to be – a desire to bring about kiddush Hashem, not the opposite.

We must train ourselves to form preventative measures which will be able to stop us from making irrational decisions in order that we remain in control with our minds over the matter at hand, and not our emotions. It is just not enough to know what one is doing, one must think and then know what he is doing.


1Bamidbar Rabbah 5:2

Photo Credit: www.oocities.org/thereisnonamefree/concorde.html

No comments:

Post a Comment