Friday, June 8, 2012

Parshas Beha'aloscha - 613 Problems

Thoughts on The Parsha
Parshas Beha'aloscha



613 Problems
By: Daniel Listhaus

וְהָאסַפְסֻף אֲשֶׁר בְּקִרְבּוֹ הִתְאַוּוּ תַּאֲוָה וַיָּשֻׁבוּ וַיִּבְכּוּ גַּם בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וַיֹּאמְרוּ מִי יַאֲכִלֵנוּ בָּשָׂר: זָכַרְנוּ אֶת הַדָּגָה אֲשֶׁר נֹאכַל בְּמִצְרַיִם חִנָּם אֵת הַקִּשֻּׁאִים וְאֵת הָאֲבַטִּחִים וְאֶת הֶחָצִיר וְאֶת הַבְּצָלִים וְאֶת הַשּׁוּמִים

The crowd that was among them cultivated a craving, and the Children of Israel also turned, and they wept, and said, “Who will feed us meat? We remember the fish that we would eat in Egypt free of charge; the cucumbers, and the melons, the leeks, the onions, and the garlic. But now our life is parched, there is nothing; we have nothing before our eyes but the manna!”
-Beha'aloscha 11:4-6

This week's parsha relates the first couple of what will be a sequence of disastrous events which occurred in the desert. The Torah1 tells us that the people started complaining that they wanted meat. They recalled how they used to get free fish while in Mitzrayim and how good life was there, whereas now they complained how they had nothing but the manna.

When reading through these passukim (verses), a couple of questions immediately come to mind. First-of-all, life in Egypt was horrible. As a matter of fact, many of the things we do by the Pesach Seder are done to remind us of what life was like in Mitzrayim. We dip the karpas in saltwater and eat maror specifically to recall the bitter lives of the exile at that point in time. So, how could it be that the Jews in the desert complained that their lives in Egypt were better? These were the same people who were forced to do back-breaking labor. Did they have short-term memory loss? Did they forget what it meant to be a Jew in Egypt?

Furthermore, their complaint was not even accurate, as Rashi2 points out. The Egyptians did not even give the Jews straw with which to build, so certainly the Egyptians would not go out of their way to offer delicacies to their slaves.

If all of this does not weaken the complaint of the B'nei Yisroel in the desert enough, let us now also recall a well known fact about the manna – it could taste like anything! Whatever the eater had in mind for it to taste like, it would taste exactly like, as Dovid HaMelech alludes to in Tehillim3. If so, what exactly was the complaint of the B'nei Yisroel? Things were not better in Egypt, they never got free fish or meat. And they did in fact have access in the desert to whatever food they wanted, because the manna tasted however the eater desired.

Based on the above issues, Rashi4 as well as the Medrash5 explain that the Jews wanted to rid themselves of the mitzvos. After Kabbalas HaTorah (the receiving of the Torah), and living for a while with the obligation of the mitzvos hanging over their heads, they desired “other meat” and other things which the Torah had commanded them not to do. They remembered the “good old days” back in Mitzrayim when these things were permitted to them; when they were able to live a “free” life, and not one controlled by the Torah. This is what the B'nei Yisroel really wanted in the midbar (desert).

What was the catalyst of this sudden change in attitude? What changed that created such a negative relationship between the Jews and the Torah?

Perhaps the answer to this question lies within what the Jews actually said to Moshe: “We have nothing before our eyes but the manna”. The manna came each day from heaven and provided each person with exactly the right amount to satisfy them. There are two approaches one could have had, though, regarding this situation in the desert. One approach could be to view the manna as a tremendous opportunity. One could sit down each day to a repast of unparalleled diversity. For lunch, one could have pizza on Mondays, falafel on Tuesdays, spaghetti on Wednesdays, knishes on Thursdays, and fish on Fridays – what better menu could one ask for! I do not know what the calorie count was for the manna, but regardless, it sounds like a great deal.

The other approach one could have regarding the manna, however, is quite different. One could wake up each morning and see the same manna over and over again and get sick of it. As Rashi6 describes, the B'nei Yisroel just looked at the manna and said,“The same thing again? We have manna every morning and manna every evening!” This latter approach was the one of the Jews in the desert. They saw the manna as the same monotonous diet, instead of viewing each meal as a totally new opportunity, and making the best of it by imagining the manna to be the most delicious foods.

Just as there are two approaches how to view the manna, there are the same two approaches regarding how one views the mitzvos of Hashem. Every day in shema we recite, in both the first paragraph ( where we accept on ourselves the yoke of Hashem) and in the second paragraph (where we accept on ourselves the yoke of the mitzvos), “...And these matters/my commandments that I command you today...” Rashi7 explains that the reason the verse says “today” is to teach us that the Torah and the mitzvos should be new in our eyes every day, as if never seen them before. Instead of being the kid with the PlayStation game who uses it for a week or two and gets tired of it, we must view each day as a new opportunity to live a day of mitzvos in the way of Hashem.

In order to live the proper life of a Jew, we must stop ourselves from living an auto-pilot life of habit and routine. The daily going to davening, putting on tallis and tefillin, these are all things that if done out of habit, lose their taste faster than the worst gum. Even the mitzvos which occur less often, such as shabbos and yom tov, become part of an ongoing cycle8. With this approach towards mitzvos, we are no better than the Jews in the desert complaining, “...We have nothing before our eyes but the manna!...Manna in the morning and manna in the evening”.
The Yomim Tovim (Jewish Holidays) are not merely a remembrance of past events, but rather a re-creation of the same atmosphere which existed during the original event. Two weeks ago we experienced Shavuos - a time of yearly re-accepting of the Torah upon ourselves. The question is – have we already fallen off our spiritual high and are now sunk back in the routine of the life as a Jew, or have we held onto the realization that each mitzva represents a unique opportunity to become closer to Hashem? This second perspective is really the only option.
The B'nei Yisroel in the desert were mistaken when they exclaimed that they missed the freedom of Mitzrayim. As a matter of fact this is something we declare by the Pesach Seder each year, “This year we are slaves, next year we will be free.” When we do the mitzvos with love, and use each of them as new opportunity and means to become closer to Hashem, then we experience true freedom.

Only with this approach will we rid ourselves of the 613 problems, and instead adopt the 613 mitzvos.
1Bamidbar 11:4-6
2Bamidbar 11:5
3Tehillim 78:18 and 106:15
4Bamidbar 11:5
5Tanchuma 11:22
6Babidbar 11:6
7Rashi in both places: Devarim 6:6 and Devarim 11:6

8I have heard a couple of times before that the reason why the Rambam groups all the daily mitzvos in the section of Ahava (love) is because one could only do something properly on a constant basis if it is being done with love.

Photo Credit: based on http://scheinerman.net/judaism/_images/ashk-torah.jpg

Friday, June 1, 2012

Parshas Nasso - Pieces of Peace

Thoughts on The Parsha
Parshas Nasso



Pieces of Peace
By: Daniel Listhaus

וַיְדַבֵּר ה' אֶל משֶׁה לֵּאמֹר: דַּבֵּר אֶל בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְאָמַרְתָּ אֲלֵהֶם אִישׁ אִישׁ כִּי תִשְׂטֶה אִשְׁתּוֹ וּמָעֲלָה בוֹ מָעַל

Hashem spoke to Moses, saying, “Speak to the Children of Israel and say to them: Any man, if his wife will go astray and commit a trespass against him....”
-Nasso 5:11-12
וְכָתַב אֶת הָאָלֹת הָאֵלֶּה הַכֹּהֵן בַּסֵּפֶר וּמָחָה אֶל מֵי הַמָּרִים

And the kohen shall inscribe these curses on a scroll and erase it into the bitter waters....”
-Nasso 5:23


This week's parsha discusses the topic of sotahthe story of a woman who was specifically warned by her husband not to be with a certain man, and yet was caught secluded with him. The Torah1 describes that when she is brought to the kohen, there was an interesting process she had to go through. First, her husband brings a karbon2 on her behalf. Then, the kohen takes an earthenware cup filled with mayim kedoshim (sacred water)3 and puts dust from the ground into it. The kohen then uncovers the woman's head4 and gives her the karbon to hold5. If at this point the sotah has yet to confess, the kohen begins to recite the following introduction before giving her the water. He says, “If a man has not lain with you, and you have not strayed in defilement with someone other than your husband, then you shall be innocent from these bitter, afflictive waters. But if you have strayed with someone other than your husband, and you have become defiled, and a man other than your husband has lain with you...!” The kohen then continues to announce, “May Hashem set you as a curse and as an oath among your people, when Hashem makes your thigh fall and your stomach distend....” The woman then responds, “Amen Amen.” At this point, the kohen inscribes these curses on a scroll and erases it into the bitter, afflictive waters. The sotah then drinks the water6. If she indeed is guilty, then her stomach becomes swollen and her thighs collapse. However, if the waters have no affect then she is innocent and receives a beracha (blessing) to have easy childbirths in the future and produce beautiful children.7
The obvious question on the sotah process is why is it necessary that the erasing of Hashem's name be included? Certainly the same miraculous results could be achieved without this disgrace to Hashem's name. Furthermore, the gemara8 writes that it is asur (forbidden) to erase Hashem's name9. If so, why should the process include erasing Hashem's name by putting it in the water for the sotah to drink?
The medrash10 brings the following story:
There was a story with Rabbi Meir who was giving a drasha (lecture) in shul one Shabbos Friday night, and there was a certain woman who was attending. By the time the drasha ended and she got back home, the Shabbos candles had already gone out and her husband furiously asked her, “Where were you until now?” She responded that she was listening to the shiur that Rabbi Meir was giving in shul. Her husband ordered her to leave the house and warned her not to return until she spat in the face of Rabbi Meir. In the meantime, Eliyahu HaNavi came to Rabbi Meir and related the event which had occurred between this woman and her husband. He told him that ultimately, because of Rabbi Meir's lecture, this woman was sent away from her house. In response to Eliyahu's visit, Rabbi Meir went to the beis medrash (study hall). At the same time, the woman, not knowing what to do, also came to the beis medrash to daven (pray). When Rabbi Meir saw her, he approached her and asked if she knew how to heal his eye. She said she did not. Rabbi Meir then asked her if she could please spit in his eye seven times to help heal it. The woman did so and went back home after telling her husband, “You only asked me to spit in Rabbi Meir's face once, but I did so seven times!”


The medrash continues to relate that the talmidim (students) who witnessed this story were very unsure of Rabbi Meir's actions. They asked him, “How could you allow for such bizayon (disgrace) of the Torah by allowing this woman to spit in your face? You should have asked us to drag her husband into the beis medrash and we would have whipped him and told him to be nice to his wife.” Rabbi Meir responded, “My kavod (honor) should by no means be greater than the honor of Hashem. So, if Hashem allows his name to be erased in the sotah-waters in order to bring peace between man and his wife and demonstrate that she is indeed innocent, then certainly I too must give up my honor to achieve peace between couples.”


This lesson that Rabbi Meir learned from the parsha of sotah is quite profound. It is worth to give up even the kavod of Torah and Hashem – so to speak - in order to bring about peace in a household.


The medrash11 says that keeping peace is of utmost importance. As one of many examples, the medrash mentions that when it came to creating the world, Hashem was very careful to create everything in balance. On the first day of Beraishis, Hashem created the Heavens and the Earth – something for the upper realm and something for the lower realm. On the second day Hashem made the rakiya (firmament) – for the sky. On the third day, it was earth's turn again and Hashem gathered the waters so that dry land could appear and grow produce. On the fourth day, Hashem created the Sun, the Moon, and the stars. On the fifth day, Hashem created the birds, giant fish, and insects – creatures of the Earth. On the sixth day, Hashem wanted to create man but was unsure – so to speak – as to what to do. If Hashem would form man from the upper realms, then it would not be fair to Earth; and if Hashem would form man from earth alone, it would be unfair to the Heavens. So, the medrash explains, Hashem formed man from both Heaven and Earth.12


Man is challenged with bringing peace to the world. Each and every person has the obligation by doing his part as an individual and forgo his kavod in order to bring shalom (peace) to others. This is leaned from the parsha of sotah. If even Hashem is willing to have his name erased in order to bring peace to a couple, and through a kal v'chomer (fortiori argument) Rabbi Meir allowed a woman to spit in his eye seven times, then certainly we must do whatever it takes to bring peace to our own homes, those of others, and to the world as a whole.


At the same time, man is challenged with another task of bringing peace; and that is within oneself. As humans, we consist of a combination of Heaven and Earth. Part of us is made from dust and wants nothing more than to just lazily lie on the ground like dust. The other half of us, our neshama, yearns for nothing other than to become close to Hashem and kedusha (Holiness), where its source is. Our job is to use the material part of ourselves in order to interact with this world, and then use the spiritual part of us to channel the physical to be used for spiritual purposes. This internal peace is what the parsha of Nazir is all about – learning to stay away from indulging in physical pleasures for its own sake, in order to ultimately be prepared to use everything in this world for purposes of kedusha.


These are the two pieces of peace described in our parsha. The topic of Sotah teaches us the importance of bringing peace to the world as a whole, while the discussion of Nazir conveys the necessity of internal peace within the two parts – gashmiyos and ruchniyos – of every human being.


Following the parshiyos of sotah and nazir, Hashem commands Moshe as follows:


Speak to Aharon and to his sons, saying: So shall you bless the Children of Israel, say to them: 'May Hashem bless you and guard you. May Hashem illuminate his countenance toward you and endow you with grace. May Hashem lift his countenance to you and establish peace for you.'”13


May Hashem fulfill his promise of Birkas Kohanim and grant us the siyata d'shmaya (Heavenly aid) necessary to achieve internal and external peace.
1Bamidbar 5:11-29
2A tenth-eipha of unsifted barley flour (without any oil or frankincense).
3The water was brought from the Kiyyor. Rashi (5:17) explains that the reason the water was taken from the Kiyyor for this purpose was because the kiyyor was what the women of b'nei Yisroel donated their mirrors for (Shemos 38:8).
4See Rashi (5:18) who says that not only is her hair uncovered, but all braids must be taken out of her hair as well.
5See Rashi (5:18) who writes that the reason for this was to try to tire her out so that she would just confess before the process leads to erasing Hashem's name, as we will soon see.
6See Rashi 5:27 who writes that if she refuses, we actually force her unless she admits to being guilty.
7See Rashi 5:28
8Makkos 22a
9The gemara learns it from Devarim 12:3-4
10Vayikra Rabbah 9:9 brought in Lev Eliyahu by Rabbi Eliyahu Lopian (also in Devarim Rabbah 10:15).
11Vayikra Rabbah 9:9
12Also see Beraishis 2:7 and Rashi there.

13Bamidbar 6:23-27

Photo Credit: Edited picture based from: http://www.futureproofingproperty.org/turn-a-vacant-land-into-profit-source/

Friday, May 25, 2012

Parshas Bamidbar and Shavuos - To Infinity... and Beyond: Be a Shooting Star!

Thoughts on The Parsha
Parshas Bamidbar
AND
SHAVUOS



To Infinity... and Beyond: Be a Shooting Star!
By: Daniel Listhaus

וַיְדַבֵּר ה' אֶל משֶׁה בְּמִדְבַּר סִינַי בְּאֹהֶל מוֹעֵד בְּאֶחָד לַחֹדֶשׁ הַשֵּׁנִי בַּשָּׁנָה הַשֵּׁנִית לְצֵאתָם מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרַיִם לֵאמֹר: שְׂאוּ אֶת רֹאשׁ כָּל עֲדַת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם לְבֵית אֲבֹתָם בְּמִסְפַּר שֵׁמוֹת כָּל זָכָר לְגֻלְגְּלֹתָם

Hashem spoke to Moshe in the wilderness of Sinai, in the Tent of Meeting, on the first of the second month, in the second year after their exodus from the land of Egypt, saying, 'Take a census of the entire assembly of the B'nei Yisroel according to their families. According to their fathers' house, by number of the names, every male according to their head count...”
-Bamidbar 1:1-2

This was not the first time during the B'nei Yisroel's travels that Hashem counted them. Rashi1 explains that the reason why Hashem counted us so often is because of His great love for us. When Hashem took the B'nei Yisroel out of Mitzrayim, He counted them.2 When B'nei Yisroel committed the cheit ha'egeil (sin of the golden calf), Hashem counted them.3 And in this week's parsha when Hashem came to rest the shechina on B'nei Yisroel he counted them.4

The mishna5 describes that any kohen was allowed to perform the mitzva of terumas hadeshen (removing the ashes from the mizbe'ach [alter]). However, if there was more than one kohen who wanted to do it, then they would race up the mizbe'ach and whoever would get to the top first would get the privilege of performing this mitzvah6. However, if two kohanim would tie in their race to the top, then instead of giving the mitzva to one of them, the s'gan kohen would do as follows. He would gather all the kohanim on duty and stand them in a circle. He would then take off the mitznefes (hat) from one of them and choose a random number. Each kohen would then stick out either one or two fingers, and starting with the hat-less kohen, the s'gan kohen would go around and count the fingers of each kohen until he would reach his chosen number. The kohen on whom the number would fall on would be the one chosen to perform the terumas hadeshen.

The gemara7 asks: Why did the s'gan have to count the kohen's finger? Why not just count the kohanim themselves? The gemara answers that it is forbidden to count Jews. The gemara then continues to pose a contradiction within the first passuk (verse) of this week's haftorah. The passuk8 states, “The number of the B'nei Yisroel shall be like the sand of the sea, which can never be measured nor counted”. As the gemara points out, the first half of this passuk seems to be saying that Jews have a definite number to them and that they could be counted.9 The second half of the passuk, though, seems to be a commandment not to count the B'nei Yisroel. How could this contradiction be resolved?

The gemara proceeds to offer two vague explanations for this contradiction. One of the answers given is that the first half of the passuk is referring to when B'nei Yisroel is not following ratzon Hashem, whereas the second half of the passuk is speaking during times when B'nei Yisroel is following ratzon Hashem. The second answer the gemara gives is that the first half of the passuk, speaking of actually counting B'nei Yisroel, refers to Hashem's perspective, whereas the second half speaks of man's perspective.

What exactly do these answers in the gemara mean?

There is a simple approach one could take in order to understand these answers which would be to plainly explain that the reason we do not count Jews is because it creates an ayin harah (evil eye). The gemara would then be answering that this concern is not one which would be present if either the Jews are following ratzon Hashem, or if it is Hashem Who is the One counting us. However, the medrash and the Kli Yakar have a different approach in dealing with the gemara's answers.

The medrash10 explains that the gemara's first answer means as follows. When Jews are not listening to the ratzon Hashem, then the first half of the passuk is applicable. Someone who refuses to follow in the ways of Hashem might be alive physically and have a number, but the bigger picture is missing. He is therefore nothing more than a person among other people, as a star is only yet another one in the sky. However one who listens to the word of Hashem becomes more than just part of the quantity, and instead becomes someone of quality. One who strives for such goals is indeed one with infinite amount of potential which is beyond belief and is uncountable.

The Kli Yakar11 takes a slightly different approach and in doing so explains the second answer of the gemara in the following way. He writes that in a sense, the counting of a nation is something unique to B'nei Yisroel. As far as the nations of the world are concerned, Hashem has no care of how many or few they are. Imagine someone who is aware that there is a haystack in his backyard. This person has no interest in knowing the number of pieces of straw; all he cares about is the fact that when he looks out his back window, there is a haystack outside. The same is true regarding goyim. Hashem does not particularly care for the specific number of people of any particular nation. They are here to populate the world with humans, just as cows have the purpose of populating the world with cows. There is no preference in the number of goyim or animals for which Hashem has any concern.

The reason for this is not because Hashem does not care about His creations, for that is simply not true. Hashem has mercy and cares for all of his creations.12 Rather, it is because there is no hashgacha p'ratis (individualized divine guidance) by goyim or animals. There is only a general hashgacha which watches whole nations as units. When it comes to B'nei Yisroel, however, it is a completely different story. Hashem has a tremendous love for each and every member of B'nei Yisroel and watches over us as individuals. This is because the potential of each Jew is as great as full nations.13

This, the Kli Yakar continues, is what the second answer of the gemara means. The first half of the passuk in this week's haftorah says, “The number of the B'nei Yisroel”. This is the relationship we have with Hashem. We are not only viewed as one nation, but rather also cared about individually. Each of us has a unique number and part of the Jewish people which Hashem cares deeply about and therefore guides us with hashgacha p'ratis. However, as the second half of the passuk states, we are countless. After all, as far as people are concerned, one could see a small nation and think it is too many to count because of its numbers.

The medrash and the Kli Yakar are each offering wonderful answers, however when one reads them together there is an obvious difficulty. The way that the medrash explains the gemara results in the first half of the passuk being something derogatory – one who does not listen to Hashem is merely a number; while the second half of the passuk is what to strive for – one who follows ratzon Hashem opens the door to limitless potential. Yet, the way the Kli Yakar explains the gemara results in a complete opposite understanding of the passuk. According to the Kli Yakar's understanding, the first part of the passuk is what one must strive for – be a star, make the most of your potential to merit the hashgacha p'ratis of Hashem; while the second half of the passuk describes that an ordinary person is just a part of a crowd and is just viewed as part of a massive nameless and endless group.

Perhaps we could fit these two explanations together by understanding that there is a balance which every Jew must consider. On the one hand, we have so many mitzvos we are tasked with; and, as heavy of a burden we think this is for us, we must come to the realization that it is within our reach and that we have the potential to accomplish tremendous amounts of mitzvos in a lifetime. On the other hand, we must realize that maximizing our potential is only worth something if it is done with the right intentions. Often times, we get so used to doing mitzvos as part of our routine that we begin to go on autopilot. However, waking up each morning with a mental checklist of what we must do to stay in the “Jew-club” is not the real purpose of mitzvos. The real purpose of mitzvos is to build a relationship with Hashem through fulfilling his commandments. This is the real ratzon Hashem.

The passuk14 says that after Moshe finished counting all the bechors (firstborn males) and “traded them” one for one with the Leviim, there were a number of bechors who were in excess over the Levi'im. Hashem commanded Moshe to redeem the remaining firstborns at a price of five shekels each and to then give the money to Aharon and his sons.

The passuk15 describes, “Moshe gave the money of those redeemed to Aharon and his sons according to the word of Hashem, as Hashem had commanded Moshe”. The Ohr Hachaim16 is bothered by what seems to be an unnecessary repetition in this passuk. Why does the passuk say that Moshe gave the money to Aharon according to the word of Hashem, and then proceed to say, “as Hashem commanded Moshe”?

The Ohr Hachaim writes that one could imagine how happy Moshe could have been when he was told to bring the large total of 1,365 shekels17 to his brother and nephews. Moshe was surely already Elazar and Isamar's favorite uncle, besides the fact he was their only uncle. Nonetheless, it is always a good feeling to be able to show up at a relative's house with surprise presents. Despite this normal sensation that one would have had if one were in Moshe's position, Moshe had no such feelings. The Ohr Hachaim explains that this is the reason why this passuk is being repetitive. The Torah is testifying about Moshe that the only happiness going through Moshe's head at the time was because of the fact that he had the privilege to carry out the ratzon Hashem.

This Ohr Hachaim is teaching us an incredible lesson. If there was anyone in history who devoted his life entirely to carrying out ratzon Hashem, it was Moshe rabbeinu. Yet, despite the fact that listening to Hashem's commands was a constant part of Moshe's daily life, there was no time which he allowed his personal interests or benefits to be the force behind why he would do a mitzva or how he would feel about carrying out ratzon Hashem. Even when it came to delivering a large unexpected gift to his own brother, the smile on his face was one which reflected his excitement of carrying out ratzon Hashem.

On the other side, however, the Orchos Tzadikkim18 brings19 the story of Elisha ben Avuah. At the time of Elisha ben Avuah's bris, his father made a seudah (meal) for all the chachomim (sages). As one could imagine, the guests were very chashuv (important) people - Rebbe Eliezer and Rebbe Yehoshua, just to name a few. During the seudah, these chachomim were engrossed in learning and eventually a real fire of Torah was formed around them. Elisha ben Avuah's father saw what was happening and exclaimed, “Have you come to burn my house?” The chachomim replied, “Do not worry, this is not a destructive fire. Rather it has just formed because of the intensity of our learning, and is testimony to the fact that the words of Torah we are saying are from Har Sinai, where the Torah was given to us in the midst of fire.” When Elisha ben Avuah's father heard this, he said, “Now that I have seen the power of Torah, if my son grows up healthy I will give him over to devote his time to learn.” The Orchos Tzadikkim writes that despite having the right idea, Elisha ben Avuah's father did so for the wrong reasons. He made his commitment based on what he considered to be a positive by-product of learning Torah, but that is not enough. For this reason, the story of the life of the great Elisha ben Avuah has the unfortunate chapters when he became a heretic.

Learning Torah and performing mitzvos only becomes real when it is joined with yiras Hashem and the desire to carry out Hashem's ratzon.20

The Kli Yakar21 writes that there is a marriage-like relationship between B'nei Yisroel and Hashem which began at Har Sinai when we received the Torah, and was sealed upon the completion of the Mishkan. We have the choice to keep this relationship at a minimum by performing mitzvos on autopilot, or to maximize this limitless opportunity by combining the two ingredients of realizing our own potential and doing so for the sole purpose of fulfilling ratzon Hashem.

The z'man (time) of Shavuos is not merely an anniversary celebrating a 332422 year old marriage, but rather a new marriage between us. May this year be a springboard to help us jump out of our routine and instead to be like Moshe and view each mitzva as an opportunity to fulfill ratzon Hashem. With this attitude we will be able to accomplish the positive sides of both halves of this week's haftorah – to strive to achieve our potential, thereby becoming privileged to Hashem's hashgacha p'ratis, and also to make sure that it is done solely for the purpose of fulfilling ratzon Hashem. It is not enough to be uncountable, it must be to infinity combined with something beyond; and it is not enough to be just another star, one must strive to be a shooting star.
1Bamidbar 1:1
2Shemos 12:37
3Shemos 32:35
4Bamidbar 1:1 Hashem counted the B'nei Yisroel on the first of the month of Iyar. This was exactly one month after the completion of the Mishkan – which was completed on the first of Nissan.
5Yoma 2:1
6Providing he was ahead by four amos
7Yoma 22b
8Hoshea 2:1
9See Rashi in Yoma 22b. Although we usually associate the number of grains of sand with infinity, the reality is that there is a finite number of grains of sand.
10Bamidbar Rabbah 2:18 and see Eitz Yosef there.
11Bamidbar 1:2
12See Tehillim 145:9
13See Derech Hashem 2:7 where he discusses astrological influences and how everyone is effected by the constellations unless one becomes close to Hashem.
14Bamidbar 3:46-47
15Bamidbar 3:51
16Ibid.
17Bamidbar 3:50
18Orchos Tzadikkim: Sha'ar HaTorah
19From the Gemara Yerushalmi Chagiga 2:1 and the Medrash Rabbah Koheles 7:18
20The Orchos Tzadikkim points out that the reality is that one cannot jump right into doing everything perfectly, and that indeed it is first necessary to learn and perform mitzvos - “shelo l'shma” (not for the pure sake). However, one must realize that that itself is a means and not an end.
21Bamidbar 1:1

22As of 5772

Photo Credit: Edited picture combination of http://www.creativityinstitute.com/fathead-74-74510-buzz-lightyear-toy-story-wall-graphic.aspx and http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/meteor-shower.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index.php/2013/04/29/inferring-from-the-meteor-stream-passage/&h=211&w=239&tbnid=2pzPJnDWzkGqLM:&zoom=1&q=meteoroids&tbnh=160&tbnw=181&usg=__uoTp5Ag83MH3qIhAHAUg0at5QNQ=&docid=2GP6RpicqGcT3M&itg=1&sa=X&ei=BKJ6U5TlJcensASVpYHACg&ved=0CJIBEPwdMAo