Friday, March 14, 2014

Parshas Tzav and Purim - Defense or De-fence?

Thoughts on The Parsha
Parshas Tzav
and
Purim



Defense or De-fence?
By: Daniel Listhaus

וּבְשַׂר זֶבַח תּוֹדַת שְׁלָמָיו בְּיוֹם קָרְבָּנוֹ יֵאָכֵל לֹא יַנִּיחַ מִמֶּנּוּ עַד בֹּקֶר

And the flesh of the sacrifice of his thanksgiving peace-offering must be eaten on the day of its offering: he may not leave any of it until morning.”
-Tzav 7:15

Continuing with the theme of karbanos (sacrifices) and their respective halachos (laws), the Torah1 commands that the karbanos must be eaten on the day of their offering and cannot be left over to be eaten the next morning. Rashi2 points out that the passuk (verse) uses many adjectives to describe the karbon being discussed. He explains that it is from these words that we learn out that the Torah is coming to include many karbanos, such as the chatas (sin-offering), asham (guilt offering), the a'yil nazir (ram of the nazir offering), and the chagiga (festival-offering) brought together with the karbon pesach, under the umbrella of this prohibition not to leave over the meat to be eaten the next day.

Despite the fact that the Torah only limits us to not wait until the morning, Rashi brings from a mishna3 that in reality, chazal (our rabbis) only allow us to eat it until midnight. Let us explore this mishna.

The first mishna in all of shas4 discuses when the proper time to recite kriyas shema at night. The passuk in the Torah which we read as part of shema, alludes vaguely to the times of “u'v'shach'be'cha uv'ku'me'cha” - “when you lie down and when you arise”.5 This is where we derive the obligation to recite shema twice a day – once in the morning and once in the evening. In terms of the exact parameters of what “when you lay down to sleep” means, however, is a matter of dispute. The Gemara6 states the two possible explanations. Either it could mean specifically the time which people go to sleep, which would be only the first few hours of the night, or it could refer to the entire time people are sleeping, which would extend all the way until the morning. The problem with this, as the Gemara itself points out, is that although indeed those are the only two possible explanations, the mishna offers three opinions The first opinion is that of Rebbe Eliezer who divides the night into segments7 and explains that one could fulfill his obligation of shema at night during the first segment, clearly interpreting the passuk to mean that the obligation of shema only extends to the time which people are actually climbing into bed and going to sleep. Rabban Gamliel argues and holds that one has until dawn in the morning, clearly holding that the passuk is allowing the night-time shema to be read during the entire period of time it is normal for people to be sleeping. However, the third opinion is that of the Rabanan (majority of Rabbis) who maintain that shema could only be read until chatzos (midnight). Being that there are only two possible explanations for the passuk, and the Rabanan do not seem to be using either one of them, what is their opinion based on? The Gemara asks this and answers that really the Rabanan agree with Raban Gamliel that the Torah allows shema to be read all night. However, the Rabbis were concerned that people would come home after a long day at work and tell themselves that they just need to eat a little and rest a little and that they would take care of kriyas shema later. However, with such an attitude there would be no doubt that people would quite easily forget to say shema. Therefore, the Rabbis set a stricter limit allowing the mitzva only to be done before chatzos, in order to distance people from coming to sin by forgetting to recite kriyas shema.

The aforementioned mishna in Berachos continues to describe that this concept of only having until chatzos to do a mitzva when really the Torah allows for it to be done all night is a common restriction for the Rabbis to put in place. The mishna then offers a few examples, including the one which Rashi in our parsha quotes – that one who brings a karbon is really allowed to eat it any time during the night, but the Rabbis decreed that it must be eaten before chatzos.
However, if we take a moment to think about the differences between kriyas shema and karbanos, it is hard to understand why the same decree would be necessary by karbanos. First, kriyas shema is a small routine thing which is quite easy to lose excitement about and come to be lazy about it or forget a night here and there. However, for most people, bringing a karbon in the Beis Hamikdash was not an every day activity. This was someone who had sinned and realized that he needed to bring a karbon as part of his teshuva (repentance) and kapparah (atonement) process, or during a time of the shalosh regalim (festivals), or after completing his period of being a nazir. Certainly, in these cases, a person would be much more careful and more religious in ensuring that everything be done properly. If so how could we understand the same necessity of a limit to only have until chatzos to eat as we have regarding reciting shema?

Furthermore, although all mitzvos are serious as they are direct commandments from Hashem and we must treat a light mitzva like a heavy mitzva,8 the reality is that obligations with a heavier price of them – whether it be the greatness of the reward or the magnitude of the punishment – we tend to take more seriously. One who does not recite shema has “merely” passively neglected to do something which he should have done. He lost out. Whereas one who waits and eats the meat of a karbon past its time has not only actively done something which outright transgresses the Torah's commandment, but is also not in for a punishment of kareis – something which is taken extremely seriously. Is it really necessary to have the added restriction not to allow the karbon be eaten past chatzos? It would seem that even without that extra push, people would already be careful because of the uniqueness of bringing a karbon and zealousness associated with it, together with the frightening consequences of not doing so correctly.

Third, more practically speaking, although we could definitely imagine ourselves plopping down on an armchair and wanting dinner or some relaxing time first and saying that we will worry about kriyas shema later on the night, it is harder to picture such a scenario regarding eating the meat of a karbon. Who would come home after a day of work and say I just need some sleep, I will rest now and wake up 4am to eat this cow?

The first mishna in Pirkei Avos relates the beginning of our mesorah (tradition) from Moshe receiving the Torah on Har Sinai to passing it down to Yehoshua, then to the zekainim (elders), then the elders to the nevi'im (prophets), and then the nevi'im to the anshei k'neses ha'gedolah (men of the great assembly). The entire Pirkei Avos goes through our mesorah from generation to generation along with the mantras and lessons of each leader. However, the very first mantras of the first mishna no doubt contain a special element of being the foundation of it all. Indeed, the first mishna teaches that the anshei k'neses ha'gedolah used to say three things: Be deliberate in judgment, develop many disciples, and make a fence for the Torah. The meforshim (commentaries)9 point out that these three things are crucial for the Torah to be taken seriously and make it through a mesorah of generations. This is why they were the chosen lessons of the anshei k'neses ha'gedolah who were charged with ensuring that the mesorah would stay strong. First, one must approach Torah differently than any other subject. It is something which requires thought and evaluation to the point that even if you know the answer to the question which is being asked to you, you must take the time to rethink it. This is because it is so precious and important that it is worthy of being checked over and over to make sure that only truth is being told, as opposed to perhaps circling answers to hard questions on a test where one may take the approach of “your first guess is often the right one”.

The second lesson of the anshei k'neses ha'gedolah is equally important. Being a part of the mesorah does not merely mean being privileged as a recipient, but rather means also being responsible as a deliverer to others. We are obligated to not just learn, but to teach what we know to others.10 In order to ensure that the mesorah continues, besides for needing the high quality, which is represented by being deliberate in judgment, a level of quantity is also necessary. One should teach many, for who knows who will be the one who will end up carrying the mesorah to the next generation.

The third teaching of the anshei k'neses ha'gedolah is to make a fence for the Torah. The meforshim explain that this refers to the Rabbis' power to make decrees in order to prevent us from doing aveiros (sins). The way of the Torah is not a cult, a religion, or a set of rules; it is the blueprint of the world which, if utilized properly, is a manual with the perfect instructions to navigate this world correctly. The Torah means so much to us, as it is literally our life. Therefore, the Rabbis instituted many decrees to prevent us from getting too close to this line of “life-and-death”.

Perhaps you have seen some cars with the bumper sticker which reads, “This car climbed Mt. Washington.” What this bumper sticker represents is that someone drove their car up the 7.6 mile trail, which the attraction itself boasts of being so narrow that you would think it is only one lane wide, though there needs to be room for two cars to pass as the same road is the way down. They further boast that the road is very windy (in terms of curves, though it is also windy [breezy] at the top), and that right at the edge of the road along the side is a cliff. There are no guardrails of any kind to stop one's vehicle from going off the road and tumbling down the mountain. No margin of error of any sort. Despite this insanity, they claim that the Mount Washington Auto Road has an exceptionally good safety record. As a matter of fact, the reason for having no guard rails is because they are sure that people will drive much more carefully knowing that the consequence is rolling down the side of a mountain in their car.

When one reads the description of this common activity for family trips, one of two things comes to mind. Either that it sort of makes sense that without guard rails people will drive much more carefully and that with such a dramatic consequence for making a mistake, there will be no mistakes. However, the other school of thought is obviously that it is all fun and games and theories until someone gets hurt. Is risking one human life not worth the investment of a barrier even if it means that people may feel more confident driving the mountain-side?

What this brings out for us is two-fold. First of all, unfortunately we have such a hard time instilling in ourselves that indeed sliding from the Torah means tumbling off a cliff. However, even if we did understand this would that mean that we should not invest in a guard rail? The decrees of the Rabbis are the guard rails which are not set arbitrarily, but rather at places with tremendous consideration, thought, and level of ruach ha'kodesh (divine spirit).

Rabbeinu Yonah11 writes that it is a great, praiseworthy thing to create a fence for mitzvos in order not to accidentally stumble. He further writes that in a real way, those who create fences and are meticulous about keeping the guards that the Rabbis set up, are much greater than those who run around doing many mitzvos. After all, someone doing a mitzva could be doing so for ulterior motives. Perhaps the mitzva is something he would want to do anyway, or something he is only doing as to not get excommunicated. However, the one who is meticulous about keeping the rabbinic decrees demonstrates a true level of fear of Hashem as he is willing to go the extra mile to ensure that he will be far from making a mistake.

The mishna in Avos12 references in more than one mishna the concept that sometimes even things we do accidentally could be treated as serious as if we did them on purpose. On the surface, this is something which is difficult to understand, but perhaps with what we have just mentioned, we could explain this concept in the following way. If indeed we really cared so much about something, we would be so careful that we would not come close to crossing the line even by accident. For example, no person in their right mind would totally degrade himself publicly because it could cost him his job, family, and the rest of his life. So too when it comes to things like Torah and kiddush Hashem, if we were really as sensitive to these things as we should be, we would not allow ourselves to overstep the boundaries even by accident.

Of course, we do not appreciate these areas as much as we should. However, we must realize that and admit that although it may be true, it is also unacceptable and therefore calls for proper measures to guard ourselves from falling.

This is the lesson of the mishna in Berachos and its application to karbanos. Granted that it may be more unlikely and the punishment may be far worse than missing kriyas shema, however the Rabbis still saw room for being concerned. In viewing it as life or death situation, they deemed it fit to create a barrier on this particular cliff as well, despite the path being slightly wider.

The decrees that the Rabbanan instituted are for the community and for the nation as a whole. However, each one of us knows ourselves best and the specific things with which perhaps we have more difficulty. We must be honest and objective with ourselves to take a step back and analyze what we could personally do in setting up our own small boundaries. This is what demonstrates on the highest level that we are serious about growing and becoming better and closer to Hashem. Otherwise, it is just talk.

The first Purim was a time which the Megilla13 describes as kimu v'kiblu – that we as a nation re-accepted the Torah out of love for Hashem. This re-acceptance was in many ways greater than receiving the Torah on Har Sinai, because during Purim we did so out of pure self-motivation and love for Hashem. Additionally, the Gemara14 tells us that starting thirty days before a chag, one must start preparing for it. Purim (Shushan Purim) is the thirty day warning mark for Pesach, but more important than starting to clean the house is to start preparing ourselves for the time of Yetziyas Metzrayim, which is itself the first book end of Kabbas Ha'Torah (receiving the Torah). Therefore what better time is there than Purim when the atmosphere itself lends to personal growth and success and is the ultimate preparation for Pesach which ultimately culminates by Shavuos when we reach the time of receiving the Torah.

Certainly, the way to achieve this is by instead of continuing our daily lives “de-fenced”, to rather take a moment to reflect and analyze where we are at and where we could be and what defense systems we could put up to help us get there. That would be the ultimate kimu v'kiblu as a demonstration that we do in fact love and care about the mitzvos we perform, and that we are indeed sensitive about the aveiros we would like to stop. After all, that is why Yom Kippur is called Yom Kippurim. It is a day “like Purim”, only secondary to Purim in comparison to what could be accomplished.

May Hashem help us use this Purim to introspect and accept upon ourselves to be extra careful regarding the decrees that the Rabbis have established for us, and to take the time to evaluate for ourselves personally what defensive measures could be taken to protect ourselves in the areas we remain to be most vulnerable. In this zechus (merit) may Hashem bring upon K'lal Yisroel the full force of mazal of the month of Adar and ultimately that this Purim should be a preparation for the real geulah (redemption) of yetziyas ha'galus and bring us back to Eretz Yisroel with Mashiach.



1Vayikra 7:15
2Rashi ibid.
3Mishna Berachos 1:1, Gemara Berachos 2a
4An acronym alluding to the six orders of mishnayos
5Devarim 6:7
6Berachos 4a-4b
7The Gemara Berachos 3a which brings a machlokes (dispute) whether Rebbe Eliezer splits the night into three or four segments, which would result in a difference of each segment being either four hours long or three if we assume a perfect twelve hour night from sunset to sunrise.
8See Avos 2:1
9See Rashi, Rambam and Rabbeinu Yonah as well as R' Ovadiah M'Bartenura
10See Avos 4:6. The basic level of learning is one who learns to teach others.
11Rabbeinu Yonah Avos 1:1
12For example 4:5 and 4:16
13Megillas Esther 9:27

14See Sanhedrin 12b
Cover Photo Credit: http://visitingnewengland.com/blog-photo-tour/2012/01/29/what-its-like-to-drive-the-mt-washington-auto-road/

No comments:

Post a Comment