Parshas
Vayishlach
Angels
in the Outfield
By:
Daniel Listhaus
וַיִּשְׁלַח
יַעֲקֹב מַלְאָכִים לְפָנָיו אֶל עֵשָׂו
אָחִיו אַרְצָה שֵׂעִיר שְׂדֵה אֱדוֹם:
וַיְצַו
אֹתָם לֵאמֹר כֹּה תֹאמְרוּן לַאדֹנִי
לְעֵשָׂו כֹּה אָמַר עַבְדְּךָ יַעֲקֹב
עִם לָבָן גַּרְתִּי וָאֵחַר עַד עָתָּה:
וַיְהִי
לִי שׁוֹר וַחֲמוֹר צֹאן וְעֶבֶד וְשִׁפְחָה
וָאֶשְׁלְחָה לְהַגִּיד לַאדֹנִי לִמְצֹא
חֵן בְּעֵינֶיךָ
“And
Yaakov sent malachim
before him to Eisav his brother to the land of Seir, the field of
Edom. He charged them saying, “Thus shall you say, 'To My lord, to
Eisav, so said your servant Yaakov: I have sojourned with Lavan and
have lingered until now. I have acquired ox and donkey, flock, and
servant, and maidservant and I am sending to tell my lord to find
favor in your eyes.'”
-Vayishlach
32:4-6
The
Torah1
describes that after Yaakov left Lavan's house, he sent malachim
ahead of him to try to determine what Eisav's feelings were toward
him. Although the word malachim
could
mean either messengers or angels, Rashi2
explains the passuk
(verse)
to mean that Yaakov sent actual angels for the task.
How
could we begin to understand the fact that Yaakov felt comfortable
sending angels to take care of his personal errands when he could
have just as easily sent a person to do the job? Malachim
are
creatures of one-hundred percent ruchniyus
(spirituality). How could Yaakov give commandments to such lofty
beings?
A
few passukim
later,
the Torah3
relates that after going back and forth over the Yabok River to ferry
his entire family across, Yaakov realized he left a few small
worthless jugs behind. When he went back to retrieve them, the Torah4
relates the fight that took place between Yaakov and the ministering
angel of Eisav. After a night of fighting, Yaakov pinned the malach
down
and would not let go. The malach
hurt Yaakov by striking and dislocating his thighbone, but to no
avail – the malach
was
still unable to escape. The malach
told
Yaakov to let him go, but Yaakov refused until the malach
of
Eisav would admit that Yaakov was the rightful receiver of the
brachos
from
Yitzchak.
The
S'forno5
is
bothered by the obvious question on this story. How is it possible
that Yaakov had the upper hand in a fight against a malach
of
Hashem? A malach
is
a purely spiritual being and Yaakov, as great as he was, was only a
man. The S'forno
says,
based on a Gemara6,
one line: Tzadikkim
are
greater than malachim.
This
S'forno
and
Gemara
are
truly unbelievable. With this approach that tzadikkim
are
greater than malachim,
we could understand why Yaakov had the authority to send the malachim
as
well as explain how he was able to defeat the malach
of
Eisav. However, why is this true that tzadikkim
are
greater than malachim?
In no way could we downplay the level of a malach.
After all, malachim
represent
single, direct commandments of Hashem. This is something that is
clear throughout chumash7
as
well as from the conversation that took place between Yaakov and the
malach
of
Eisav
in
this week's parsha.
Yaakov asked the malach,
“Tell me please, what is your name?” The malach
responded,
“Why is it that you ask my name?” Rashi8
explains
that the malach
was
telling Yaakov, “We have no fixed name. Our names change according
to the task of the mission upon which we are sent [from Hashem].”
Malachim
are
pure expressions of Hashem's will. So still, how could we understand
that tzadikkim
are
greater than malachim?
The
mishna9
states,
“He [Rabban Gamliel] used to say: Treat His [Hashem's] will as if
it were your own will. So that he should treat your will as if it
were His will.” What does this mean? Is it a one-for-one game of 'I
scratch your back and you scratch mine'? Are we simply supposed to do
something Hashem wants in order to be rewarded in turn by Him doing
something that we desire?
Rabbeinu
Yonah10
explains that our job is to literally adopt Hashem's ratzon
(will)
as our own. We must strive to achieve a level where everything we do,
say, think, and want is precisely what Hashem's will is. The mishna
is
not teaching us how to negotiate deals with Hashem to get what we
want, rather is giving a directive to synchronize our ratzon
with
Hashem's.
Later
on in the parsha,
the
Torah11
testifies. “He [Yaakov] set up a mizbeach
(alter)
there and he called to it “G-d is the G-d of Yisroel”. The
Gemara12
says that based on the grammatical construction of the passuk,
it seems that the passuk
is
actually trying to convey the following message: Yaakov set up a
mizbeach
there. And He – the G-d of Yisroel - called to him [Yaakov] 'G-d'.
This too is astounding. How could it be that man be called G-d? There
is only one G-d and He alone is the creator and controller of the
world. However, even with knowing this as a basic principle of our
emunah
(faith),
we
must also consider the fact that
man
was created
b'tzelem
Elokim
and
therefore indeed, contained within man is the potential to maximize
his one's koach
ha'bechirah (power
of free-will) to the extent that one has the ability to achieve
extremely high levels of G-dliness.
Many
people underestimate chashivus
ha'adom. Even
those who actually appreciate that man is an incredible being with
tremendous potential, still mistakenly rank mankind as somewhere
between animal and malach.
However, the truth is exactly the opposite. Man is not situated
between animal and malach.
Rather, man is located on the bookends of the spectrum. On the one
hand, man has the ability to choose to do evil and exist on a level
lower than the lowest creatures.
On
the other hand, man has the ability to choose to do good and follow
the derech
HaTorah and
ultimately become even greater than malachim.
This is because even though malachim
are pure expressions of Hashem's will, they are strictly defined and
remain at a status that is in the outfield. People however, have the
ability to become so close to Hashem through using one's bechirah
to align one's ratzon
to Hashem's. Such an individual is even fitting to have his own
malachim
do certain tasks for him.13
After all, carrying out the will of a person who is completely
engrossed in avodas
Hashem
is comparable to carrying out the will of Hashem Himself.
May
Hashem help us discover our ability to be in the infield, close to
Hashem, and guide us in using our koach
ha'bechirah
correctly to achieve this goal.
1Beraishis
32:4
2Ibid.
Rashi obviously
did not arbitrarily choose this
meaning over the other, rather he saw an implication from the passuk
to learn this way. (See Sifsei
Chachomim there)
3Beraishis
32:24 and see Rashi there
4Beraishis
32:25
5Beraishis
32:27
6Sanhedrin
93a. See Maharsha
there who writes that in Tanach
we see that man is referred to as an “Elokim”
(G-d) whereas malachim are
only referred to “bar Elokim”
(offspring/an extension of G-d).
7For
example see Beraishis 18:2
and Rashi there.
8Beraishis
32:30
9Avos
2:4
10Ibid.
11Beraishis
33:20
12Megillah
18a. Rashi (33:20)
brings this in his second explanation but the Gemara
explains it with more detail.
13See
Pirkei Avos 4:13 which
states that every time a person does a mitzva,
he is koneh (acquires/gains)
a single malach advocate.
Photo Credit: http://dudleysports.com/softball_player_tips.html
Photo Credit: http://dudleysports.com/softball_player_tips.html
No comments:
Post a Comment