Friday, November 13, 2015

Parshas Toldos - Rags to Riches

~ Thoughts on the Parsha ~
Parshas Toldos


Rags to Riches
By: Daniel Listhaus

וַיְהִי יִצְחָק בֶּן אַרְבָּעִים שָׁנָה בְּקַחְתּוֹ אֶת רִבְקָה בַּת בְּתוּאֵל הָאֲרַמִּי מִפַּדַּן אֲרָם אֲחוֹת לָבָן הָאֲרַמִּי לוֹ לְאִשָּׁה: וַיֶּעְתַּר יִצְחָק לַה' לְנֹכַח אִשְׁתּוֹ כִּי עֲקָרָה הִוא וַיֵּעָתֶר לוֹ ה' וַתַּהַר רִבְקָה אִשְׁתּוֹ:

“Yitzchak was forty years old when he took Rivkah, daughter of Besuel the Aramean from Paddan-Aram, sister of Lavan the Aramean, as a wife for himself. Yitzchak entreated Hashem opposite his wife, because she was barren. Hashem allowed Himself to be entreated by him, and his wife Rivkah conceived.”
-Toldos 25:20-21

            The Torah tells us that Rivkah was barren. However, instead of simply writing “Rivkah” in the passuk (verse), the Torah goes out of its way to describe her as, “Rivkah, daughter of Besuel the Aramean, sister of Lavan”. Rashi[1] explains that the reason the Torah does this here is in order to tell of Rivkah’s praise, that despite being the daughter of a wicked person [Besuel] and the sister of a wicked person [Lavan] and coming from a place of wicked people [Paddan-Aram], she did not learn from their deeds and copy their wicked behaviors, rather she became a tremendously righteous woman in her own right.

            As wonderful and praiseworthy as this is, it becomes problematic when read alongside Rashi in the very next passuk. The passuk[2] relates that both Yitzchak and Rivkah davened to Hashem asking Him to allow them to have children. Yet, the passuk ends that Hashem answered his [Yitzchak’s] tefillah (prayer). Rashi[3] picks up on this and comments that Hashem indeed answered Yitzchak’s tefillah, but not Rivkah’s, because the prayer of a tzaddik ben rasha (a righteous person who is the child of a wicked person) is not comparable to the prayer of a tzaddik ben tzaddik (a righteous person who is the child of a righteous person). Therefore Hashem answered “his tefillah” and not hers.

            How could we understand these two Rashi’s? At first Rashi seems to praise those who, despite coming from less-privileged backgrounds, are able to persevere on their own against the current and become great in their own right. Yet, Rashi in the very next passuk seems to imply that no matter how far one has come and worked on oneself, one who comes from a wicked house – a tzaddik ben rasha – can never remove that stain and could therefore never achieve the greatness that a tzaddik ben tzaddik can. How could we begin to understand this concept? Imagine there are two people. One who was born into wealth and took over a family business, and another who started off dirt-poor and worked really hard his entire life until he built his own multi-million dollar business. Although both may be equally successful, there is no question that the latter stands out much more in terms of a story of self-motivation and perseverance. Why when it comes to judging one’s righteousness would we assume differently? Yitzchak was “lucky” to be born into the house of Avraham. He grew up witnessing miracles, received a top quality religious education, was blessed with wealth, and was honored by all. The expectation was that he would grow up to be Yitzchak avinu. He had everything delivered to him on a silver platter. Rivkah however was the proverbial entrepreneur with a “from-rags-to-riches” story. She grew up amongst liars and cheaters, lived in a house of avodah zarrah (idol worship), struggled to make a living, and yet was able to not only retain her purity and good middos (traits), but was able to thrive in the worst environment and become worthy to fulfill the role as mother to B’nei Yisroel. How could Rashi explain that Hashem would overlook all this and instead favor the one who came from a more privileged background? If anything it should be the opposite! Rivkah, who struggled her whole life and had to work extra hard to get to where she was at, should have been answered first by Hashem?[4]

            Perhaps we could suggest an answer based on the following. On the one hand, it is true that all things being equal, nothing could compare to a ba’al teshuva. One who was brought up a certain way and decided to go against the grain and change to become religious is much more praiseworthy than one who was just “born into it”. As the Gemara[5] states, “In the place where ba’alei teshuva stand, complete tzaddikim cannot stand.” However, there is a way for tzaddik ben tzaddik to achieve even higher heights. The Chovos Halevavos[6] writes that there are really two aspects to the mitzvos. One part is simply the chovos ha’eivarim – the obligation we have to physically do the mitzvos. For example, we must put on tzitzis and tefillin, recite Shema, daven, learn Torah, make berachos (blessings), blow shofar, sit in a succah (on Succos), and eat matzah (on Pesach), just to name a few. However, although it is objectively true that keeping the 613 mitzvos is rather difficult, it is relatively easy for one to get used to the schedule and routine, especially one who is born into a religious family and in a religious community where there is a pressure to do so, and where living a daily life as a Jew is normal and habitual. A person could accomplish mitzvos and check them off daily like tasks on a chore list, and indeed his reward will be good. However, there is a second facet of performing mitzvos which more than just enhances them, but rather compliments them, by adding a new dimension called chovos ha’levavos – the duties of the heart. Chovos ha’levavos refers to the mindset of the one performing the mitzvah. Is it being done simply because everyone else is doing it or because of a love to fulfill the mitzvos of Hashem? The heart defines the quality of the action.

Certainly one who grows up in a house of a tzaddik has the incredible advantage of habitually performing mitzvos from a young age. However, this advantage could sometimes prove to be a disadvantage when it comes to the chovos ha’levavos aspect of the mitzvos. It is much harder for one who was raised to go to minyan daily and put on tefillin to do so with the same amount of love and motivation as one who lived a non-religious life and then decided on his own to become religious. A ba’al teshuva has a drive of love to perform mitzzvos because it is self-built. The ba’al teshuva became as such because of an appreciation and yearning he or she had for the mitzvos. Such appreciation is harder to come by when one is “born into the system”. However, one who is able to not only be born into being religious and having a family of tzaddikim but is also able to achieve a level of ba’alei teshuva regarding the chovos ha’levavos aspect of the mitzvos – has the best of both worlds. For example, someone who was born into a poor family but worked hard and amassed wealth will greatly appreciate what he has; whereas oftentimes, someone who was raised in an affluent home will not share that same appreciation. However, someone who despite his wealth could come to the same realization and appreciation that having it is a privilege and not a right, has accomplished an even more difficult challenge.

This was precisely the level that Yitzchak had achieved. He grew up in the house of Avraham – in an atmosphere where it was easy to do the right thing. Even though the world was still overwhelmingly polytheistic, Avraham had created a bubble with his followers where they were able to live lives of keeping the mitzvos while at the same time earning a tremendous amount of respect by the kings and princes of the various countries and their populations. It was easy for Yitzchak, as a tzaddik ben tzaddik, to excel in the area of chovos ha’eivvarim but far more difficult to perfect his chovos ha’levavos and appreciate the lifestyle to the point of being self-motivated to do the mitzvos out of pure love for Hashem. Yet, he accomplished this to the fullest extent. This is why when Yitzchak and Rivkah were both davening to Hashem, the tefillos of Yitzchak deserved to be answered first; because although in a place where a ba’al teshuva stands a tzaddik cannot, but in a place where a tzaddik ben tzaddik is able to achieve the level of pure love for Hashem and His mitzvos despite growing up with it and easily being able to perform them out of route, nothing is greater.

Baruch Hashem, many of us have the privilege of being born into religious frum homes. Furthermore, we have the incredible benefit of living in a modern world where keeping shabbos is easy, keeping kosher is easy, and there is religious freedom. However, we must keep in mind that the chovos ha’eivarim of going through the motions of the mitzvos is only one side of the coin, it must be completed with the proper chovos ha’levavos. We must train ourselves to have a true appreciation for the mitzvos and a self-developed love for Torah.

May Hashem help us excel in the area of chovos ha’levavos and with that zechus (merit) may He answer the tefillos of B’nei Yisroel as He did for Yitzchak.



[1] Beraishis 25:20
[2] Beraishis 25:21
[3] Ibid.
[4] See Sifsei Chochomim and Ohr HaChaim who actually do learn this way.
[5] Berachos 34b
[6] Sefer Chovos Ha’levavos by Rabeinu Bachya ibn Pakuda

Friday, November 6, 2015

Parshas Chayei Sarah - Test of Kindness

~ Thoughts on the Parsha ~
Parshas Chayei Sarah


Test of Kindness
By: Daniel Listhaus

וְהָיָה הַנַּעֲרָה אֲשֶׁר אֹמַר אֵלֶיהָ הַטִּי נָא כַדֵּךְ וְאֶשְׁתֶּה וְאָמְרָה שְׁתֵה וְגַם גְּמַלֶּיךָ אַשְׁקֶה אֹתָהּ הֹכַחְתָּ לְעַבְדְּךָ לְיִצְחָק וּבָהּ אֵדַע כִּי עָשִׂיתָ חֶסֶד עִם אֲדֹנִי

“Let it be that the maiden to whom I shall say, 'Please tip your jug so I may drink,' and who replies, 'Drink, and I will even water your camels,' her will You have chosen for Your servant, for Yizchak; and may I know through her that You have done kindness with my master.”
-Chayei Sarah 24:14

            Avraham charged his trusted servant, Eliezer, to find the perfect wife for Yitzchak. The Torah[1] relates that Eliezer said to Hashem that in order to find a wife for Yitzchak, he was going to ask every woman who came to the well for a drink of water. The one who would in return offer a drink for both him and his camels, Eliezer would take as a wife for Yitzchak.

            There are two questions which come up when reading about this idea of Eliezer. The first issue is one brought up by Tosfos in Chullin[2]. The Gemara[3] says that we are not permitted to practice divination. As a matter of fact, even a non-Jew cannot practice such conjectures. If so, how could Eliezer say that if a woman comes out and offers water to him and his camels, that he would take it as a sign that she is the right wife for Yitzchak? That would be comparable to saying, “If there is less than a half a tank of gas in my car, I will take it as a sign that Hashem does not want me to go to Shul today.” We are not allowed to base our decisions on such meaningless events. So, how could Eliezer choose to take a woman for Yitzchak just because she said some catch-phrase?

            The second issue which needs to be addressed is one which is brought by the Medrash[4] as well as the Gemara[5]. There were three[6] people in history who asked for things in a way which was inappropriate. Two of these people received good responses from Hashem, regardless of their improper requests. The third, however, was not as fortunate and experienced a most horrible consequence.

            The Gemara explains that one of these three was Eliezer, who said that the girl who would respond, “Drink and I will even water your camels”, would be the one he would take as a wife for Yitzchak. This was considered to be an improper request because it left an opportunity to be open for someone to meet this requirement, yet not be the right person for Yitzchak. Fortunately, Hashem made Rivka be the one to come first with this response.

            The second person was Shaul[7]. During his reign, the Pelishtim came to attack under the leadership of Goliyas. Shaul promised that whoever would kill Goliyas would receive tremendous riches and be able to marry his daughter. Similar to Eliezer's statement, Shaul’s promise was pretty careless. It could have been any person who potentially might have stepped forward and manage to defeat Goliyas. Again, luckily, Hashem sent Dovid HaMelech to be the one to fight and kill Goliyas.

            The third man, however, was not as fortunate. The Navi[8] relates that Yiftach davened to Hashem that he should be victorious in his battle against Ammon. Yiftach promised, “If you will indeed deliver Ammon into my hands, then whatever comes out of my house first shall be for Hashem and I will offer it as a sacrifice.” Unfortunately, Yiftach's luck did not match Eliezer's or Shaul's, for the first thing to come out of his house upon his return from a successful battle, was his daughter.

            Why was it that Eliezer and Shaul were granted positive responses, despite their improper requests, whereas Yiftach was left in shock, faced with the realization that, “I have opened my mouth to Hashem and now I cannot go back.”?

            The Orchos Tzadikkim[9] writes that there are three ways in which someone could be generous: With one's money, body, and wisdom. These three facets of this middah (trait) are actually seen from Avraham who was the first to master them. Avraham was someone who was constantly spending his money on other people, providing meals and help to those in need. Avraham also put tremendous amounts of physical effort into others, the prime example being when he involved himself in a world war in order to save his brother-in-law. Needless to say, Avraham also spent his entire life investing time and wisdom into his generation to educate them about Hashem's existence and the concept of monotheism.

            When Eliezer said that he would take the first person who would offer water for him and his camels, as a wife for Yitzchak, he was not really taking any big chances. The S'forno[10] writes that it is the way of one who needs someone else's help to ask for less than he really needs; but at the same time, it is the way of the generous ba'al chesed to then give more than what was asked. Eliezer was not looking for some catch-phrase that as soon as some random woman would recite the magic words, she would be taken as a wife for Yitzchak. Rather, Eliezer waited for the person who would respond with the complete middah of nedivos (generosity); someone who was willing to put in money, physical effort, time, and wisdom for the sake of a complete stranger. Such a person would surely be the right woman for Yitzchak.
           
            During the time of Shaul's kingship, when Goliyas and the Pelishtim started instigating and fighting, the Jews knew that their army was no match for Goliyas. There was no one who had the strength, nor the confidence to even attempt to kill Goliyas. At that point, Shaul offered his daughter to anyone who would stand up to take on Goliyas' challenge. Shaul knew that only a tremendous yiras shamayim would feel the assurance of Hashem being at his side. Therefore, although Shaul's promise might have been a little imprudent, still, there was not too much risk involved because who other than the truest ba’al yiras shamayaim would have the confidence to fight Goliyas?

            Yiftach’s story, however, was quite different. After returning from battle and hastily swearing that the first thing out of his house will be brought as a karbon, there was no element of chochmah in his statement that provided perfect qualification for the ultimate karbon. It was a statement made too fast from his emotions, and resulted in a bad ending despite stemming from a good place and good intentions of love for Hashem and an appreciation of having the strength to win the battle.  
           
            We are the descendents of Avraham, Yitzchak, and Yaakov; a family built upon chesed. This is true to the extent that the Gemara states that anyone who does not express the qualities of someone always looking to do chesed, is not considered as being part of the children of Avraham. After all, our family – B’nei Yisroel – is one synonymous with chesed to the point that Eliezer could know for certain that one who exhibits such middos is befitting to marry into the family of Avraham.

May Hashem help us never forget that we are all indeed family and that the differences we have between us are petty in the long run and not worth fighting with each other or bearing a grudge over. With this in mind may we be zocheh to continue our mesorah of being gomlei chasadim.



[1]    Beraishis 24:14
[2]    Chullin 95b. Tosfos asks the question according to the opinion which maintains that even non-Jews are not allowed to practice divination or superstitions. Tosfos answers that according to this opinion, Eliezer did not actually finalize anything or give Rivkah the jewelry until he asked, “Whose daughter are you” and she responded that she was from Besu’el who was of the family of Avraham. On this Tosfos asks: This is not the order that the Torah writes it in? The Torah relates that Eliezer gave her the jewelry before asking which family she was from – implying that indeed Eliezer used this means of divination as a deciding factor to give her the jewelry. (This also must be the opinion of Rashi who comments later, when Eliezer retells the story to Lavan and Besu’el, that Eliezer switched the order of events).
[3]    Sanhedrin 56b
[4]    Beraishis Rabbah 60:3
[5]    Ta'anis 4a
[6]    The Medrash actually mentions four, adding Kalev to the list.
[7]    Shmuel Alef 17:25
[8]    Shoftim 11:30-31
[9]    Orchos Tzadikkim: Sha'ar HaNedivos
[10]  Beraishis 24:14

Friday, October 30, 2015

Parshas Vayeira - As a Matter of Opinion

~ Thoughts on the Parsha ~
Parshas Vayeira


As a Matter of Opinion
By: Daniel Listhaus

וַיִּגַּשׁ אַבְרָהָם וַיֹּאמַר הַאַף תִּסְפֶּה צַדִּיק עִם רָשָׁע: אוּלַי יֵשׁ חֲמִשִּׁים צַדִּיקִם בְּתוֹךְ הָעִיר הַאַף תִּסְפֶּה וְלֹאתִשָּׂא לַמָּקוֹם לְמַעַן חֲמִשִּׁים הַצַּדִּיקִם אֲשֶׁר בְּקִרְבָּהּ: חָלִלָה לְּךָ מֵעֲשׂת כַּדָּבָר הַזֶּה לְהָמִית צַדִּיק עִםרָשָׁע וְהָיָה כַצַּדִּיק כָּרָשָׁע חָלִלָה לָּךְ הֲשֹׁפֵט כָּל הָאָרֶץ לֹא יַעֲשֶׂה מִשְׁפָּט

“Avraham came forward and said, 'Will You even destroy the righteous with the wicked? Perhaps there are fifty righteous men in the midst of the city; will You even destroy and not forgive the place for the sake of the fifty righteous men who are in its midst? It would be sacrilege to You to do such a thing, to bring death upon righteous with wicked; so the righteous will be like the wicked. It would be sacrilege to You! Shall the Judge of all the earth not do justice?”
-Vayeira 18:23-25

            In the beginning of parshas Vayeira[1], the Torah describes that Avraham was sitting by the entrance to his tent in the heat of the day. Avraham, the tremendous ba'al chesed, was desperately awaiting guests even though he had just had his bris milah (circumcision) and was still in pain.[2] In order to appease Avraham, Hashem sent three malachim (angels) in the form of men for Avraham to entertain. Rashi[3] tells us that each of these three malachim had come for a distinct purpose. One was to tell Sarah that she would give birth in a year, one was to heal Avraham, and one was overturn Sodom. After the first two had completed their missions, Rashi[4] relates that the third malach delayed going to Sodom in order to give Avraham the chance to ask Hashem for mercy.

            Indeed, after the malachim had left Avraham's tent, Hashem told Avraham that he was planning on destroying Sodom. Avraham's immediate response to this, however, seems quite aggressive. Avraham responded, “Perhaps there are fifty righteous people in the midst of the city; would You even obliterate, and not spare the place for the sake of the fifty righteous people that are within it? It would be sacrilege to You to do such a thing, to bring death upon righteous with the wicked...Shall the Judge of all the earth not do justice?”[5]

            The fact that this sounds to us as a bold statement to make to Hashem, and that it does not seem to match with Avraham's usual humble personality,[6] is beyond the scope of this d'var Torah. Let us just focus on the actual argument that Avraham was making.

            Rashi[7] explains that Avraham's argument was the following: “It is profane for You. For people will say, 'Such is His craft! He washes away everything, righteous and wicked. So did You do to the generation of the mabul (flood) and to the generation of Migdal Bavel (Tower of Babylon).'”

            This Rashi is extremely difficult to understand. Why was Avraham so worried that such a thing would occur? The history text books were not as large then as they are now. Certainly the two major events covered in any school curriculum were the mabul and the dor haflaga (Generation of the Dispersion by the Tower of Babylon). Everyone knew the story of Noach's family and how they were saved in the teivah (ark) with all the animals. Additionally, everyone was aware of the fact that there were no casualties as a result of building Migdal Bavel, other than the fact that, consequently, the world was divided into seventy languages. So, what was Avraham so worried about? Why was he afraid that if Hashem would kill the righteous with the wicked in Sodom, that people would start to say that Hashem also killed the righteous with the wicked by the mabul and dor haflaga?

            In 2006, Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler created various fake newspaper articles – each one was written to confirm some widespread misconception or rumor, which people had formed strong opinions about. For example, in one article they wrote that the United States had indeed found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. After giving this article to some people to read, they would then give them a version of a “corrected” paper saying that there was a mistake, and that in reality the weapons of mass destruction were never found. In this research study, Nyhan and Reifler discovered that those who supported the war actually continued to agree with the first article – despite the fact that a second article was given to them specifically correcting that error. Also, those who were opposed to the war, said that they were all along skeptical of the first article and therefore never completely accepted its contents as accurate.

            This is something that we do on a daily basis. When we weigh ourselves on the scale and are happy with the results – we jump off smiling. Yet, when we are upset with the numbers, we get off, reset the scale, and try again with absolute perfect balance. When playing baseball and running to first, the runner honestly swears that he got there first, while the first baseman equally assures everyone that he touched the base first with the ball and that the runner is out. All of these scenarios demonstrate that the assumptions we make and opinions we believe take a strong hold on us; even to the extreme that we will see facts erroneously and remember events differently. 

            The Orchos Tzadikkim[8] discusses the importance of memory.[9] Although the author writes that it is obvious that the world would not be able to run properly without people remembering, the Orchos Tzadikkim goes through several examples. The last example he gives is the following: “And when one goes to testify before Beis Din (court) regarding that which he saw and knows, he must be extremely careful to remember correctly, and not subtract nor add on that which he saw and knows”.

            In this chapter, the Orchos Tzadikkim is not discussing liars or people who are out to get others because of anger or jealousy. Those middos (character traits) are reserved for other chapters. If so, that the Orchos Tzadikkim is solely dealing with memory, then how could we understand why the Orchos Tzadikkim feels it necessary to warn us to be careful to remember correctly and not add or subtract from what one saw and knows? If we are dealing with an honest person who knows precisely what occurred, why should there be a worry that he may add or subtract to what he saw and knows?

            Perhaps the Orchos Tzadikkim is alluding to this point of human nature we are discussing. Even an honest person who thinks he knows what he saw must be careful not to allow his opinion to get in the way, thereby distorting the facts. If we allow our beliefs and personal opinions to be at the forefront of our minds, then what we are essentially doing is causing ourselves to constantly be looking at the world with colored glasses over our eyes. Such a person who allows facts to be tainted by personal opinion cannot be trusted to deliver accurate facts.

            Perhaps this is what Avraham was worried about. Hashem needed to destroy Sodom because its sins became too great for the world to sustain[10]. The destruction of Sodom and Amorah was going to be a lesson to the world to wake up and realize that such wickedness would not be tolerated. If Hashem were to destroy the righteous with the wicked in such a situation, Avraham was concerned that a strong opinion would be formed in the mind of the world as a whole. People would see that the righteous too were killed and say about Hashem that, “Such is His craft! He washes away everything, righteous and wicked. So did You do to the dor ha'mabul and so to the dor haflaga.” People would begin to subconsciously distort the facts of the past in order to fit them with their opinions of the present. Avraham, who knew that Hashem's judgment comes from absolute truth and righteousness,[11] could not stand for such a belief to enter the world.

            This exact concept actually reappears later in parshas Vayeira as well. After the destruction of Sodom, Avraham traveled to Gerar. Upon entering, Avraham experienced déjà vu as Sarah was once again taken to the king's palace.[12] When Avimelech, king of Gerar was suddenly struck with a deathly plague, he called out to Hashem, “My Lord, will you slay a nation even though it is righteous? Did he [Avraham] himself not tell me that: 'She is my sister'...”[13]. Rashi[14] on this passuk comments that Avimelech was really saying the following, “I have done nothing wrong. I was under the impression that Sarah was Avraham's sister, yet You want to kill me for trying to marry her? Perhaps this is Your practice, to destroy people for no reason. So did You do to the dor ha'mabul and the dor haflaga. I say that you slew them for no reason just as You will slay me [for no reason].”

            In the end of the day, though, Avimelech was saved from the plague. So, what happened to his “strong belief” that all the history books were wrong? Did he or did he not believe that everyone in Noach's time was also righteous, and that all the participants during the dor haflaga were killed without record? What happened to the “I say that you slew them for no reason...”? Why were these differences in recalling the past dependent on something that would occur in the present? Clearly, Avimelech was not threatening Hashem that he would start pretending that Hashem was an unfair G-d, rather, Avimelech was just thinking out loud that if Hashem is willing to destroy innocent people, then that is what must have happened during the past events as well. Avimelech, without realizing, was on the verge of becoming a different person solely because on his newly formed opinion. He would therefore also have a different perspective and memory on the past – even if it would mean subconsciously making up parts of history.

            This is the inferred lesson we could learn from Avraham's discussion with Hashem. Human's are easily swayed by opinions. The power of opinion and preconceived notions are such that we are even willing, subconsciously, to remember facts differently in order to fit them into our opinions and beliefs. This is something which is a middah and could be worked on. Zechira (remembering) is the safeguard for emes (truth and reality). This means that even if we are honest, good people we still must make sure that we remember things objectively, and not clouded by our thoughts and opinions. We must work on this aspect of this middah in order to ensure that we are not limiting ourselves to a perspective influenced by our views and beliefs. This is the only way we could be sure that we are really seeing what we think we see, and really know what we think we know.




[1]    Beraishis 18:1-2
[2]    Rashi Beraishis 18:1
[3]    Beraishis 18:2
[4]    Beraishis 19:1
[5]    Beraishis 23-25
[6]    See Beraishis 18:27, where Avraham, just two passukim (verses) later, humbly says that he is of but dust and ash.
[7]    Rashi Beraishis 18:25
[8]    Orchos Tzadikkim: Sha'ar HaZechira - (Gate 19: The Gate of Remembrance)
[9]    It is difficult to understand how memory is a character trait that could be worked on and perfected. Memory is something we may associate with height or IQ level – that people are born with different set capabilities. However, from the fact it is in Orchos Tzadikkim it must be it is really something that could be worked on. See the section on my blog titled “Sha'ar Hazechira” for a possible explanation. Also see my d'var Torah to Parshas Korach – Remember to Remember for another possible approach.
[10]  Bereishis 18:20
[11]  Tehillim 19:10
[12]  An almost identical episode occurred in parshas Lech Lecha 12:10-20
[13]  Beraishis 20:4-5
[14]  Beraishis 20:4

Friday, October 23, 2015

Parshas Lech Lecha - Test by Design

~ Thoughts on the Parsha ~
Parshas Lech Lecha


Test by Design
By: Daniel Listhaus

 וַה' אָמַר אֶל אַבְרָם אַחֲרֵי הִפָּרֶד לוֹט מֵעִמּוֹ שָׂא נָא עֵינֶיךָ וּרְאֵה מִן הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר אַתָּה שָׁם צָפֹנָה וָנֶגְבָּה וָקֵדְמָה וָיָמָּה: כִּי אֶת כָּל הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר אַתָּה רֹאֶה לְךָ אֶתְּנֶנָּה וּלְזַרְעֲךָ עַד עוֹלָם:

“Hashem said to Avram after Lot had parted from him, ‘Raise now your eyes and look out from where you are: northward, southward, eastward, and westward. For all the land that you see, to you will I give it, and to your descendants forever. ”
-Lech Lecha 13:14-15

            The Torah[1] relates that Lot’s shepherds of Lot started quarreling with the Avraham’s shepherds. Rashi[2] explains that the cause of the dispute was that Lot’s shepherds would graze their cattle in the fields of others, and Avrahams’s shepherds would rebuke them saying that they were stealing by allowing their animals to graze in other’s fields. However, Lot’s shepherds would just rationalize and retort that the land [Eretz Yisroel] was promised to Avraham, and being that he has no heir, Lot’s family would inherit it so it is not really stealing. This of course was nothing more than a rationalization because as the next passuk (verse) says, “The Canaanite and Perizzite were then dwelling in the land”, so Avraham did not yet have possession of it. As we know, this argument resulted in Lot separating from Avraham and moving to Sodom.

            The passuk[3] tells us that right after Lot parted from Avraham, Hashem came to Avraham and told him to look around in all four directions, that all the land he could see will be his and his descendents forever. Rashi[4] is bothered by why the Torah feels it necessary to stress the fact that it was specifically right after Lot left Avraham that Hashem came to speak to him. Rashi answers that the entire time Lot was with Avraham, Hashem did not speak to Avraham because Lot was wicked.

            The S’forno, however, has a different approach. The S’forno[5] writes that the reason Hashem waited to tell this to Avraham until after Lot left was because Hashem was concerned that had He come to Avraham while Lot was still around, the reinforced message that Eretz Yisroel would be given to Avraham would have caused Lot and his shepherds to become haughty and feel that they already owned the place and make themselves comfortable, stealing whatever they wanted. Therefore, Hashem waited for Lot to leave before he spoke to Avraham and showed him all the land He promised to him and his descendents.

            The obvious problem with this S’forno is that Hashem’s plan did not seem to work. The S’forno is saying that Hashem waited for lot to leave Avraham in order to speak to him because He did not want Lot to come to steal. However, that happened anyway! The whole reason why Lot and Avraham split up was because of the fighting that Avraham’s shepherds had with Lot’s to try to get them to stop stealing others’ property. So what did Hashem gain – so to speak – by waiting for Lot to leave in order to speak to Avraham? It seems like either way Lot ended up feeling that he had divine rights to Eretz Yisroel?

            The purpose of life and G-d’s role in this world are topics that have been debated by philosophers for centuries. There are so many levels of belief each varying when it comes to understanding these core questions. Some believe that the world was created by accident and that humans are a product of chance. Therefore, by definition, life has no purpose, ethics, morals, or expectations other than those made up by man in order to live together under the same sky. Others believe that G-d put us here for His entertainment, which does not either even deserve a refutation. We as Jews however not only hold onto Judaism – the Torah she’bichsacv (Written Torah), the Torah she’ba’al peh (Oral Torah), and our mesorah (tradition) – as a religion, but rather even more, that it contains in it the chochmah (wisdom) and insight into the purpose of mankind and the world as a whole with an order and system to everything – even including things as basic as thought, speech and the most mundane of actions such as which shoe lace to tie first. Not only is the world and everything in it purposeful, but Hashem’s involvement is intricate and intimate.

            As a person lives through life, he or she is inevitably met with struggles and challenges. Sometimes these challenges are in the form of a spiritual struggle bein adom l’makom. Other times it is an interpersonal struggle bein adom l’chaveiro. Sometimes we are challenged financially, sometimes physically, and other times mentally or emotionally. And often times we could even prove to be our own worst enemies and have internal struggles which eat us up alive.

Although to point to a single idea and declare it as the purpose of life is way beyond the scope of this d’var Torah, what we could do as at least understand that there is a purpose which exists and that life’s challenges are not only a necessary means to achieve that purpose, but that life’s challenges are actually hand-picked for us individually by Hashem Himself. Hashem understands our nature perfectly, for he created us. Therefore it is He alone who is able to construct the perfect challenges for us to overcome and grow from. Hashem knows the different measures of the various middos (character traits) He injected in each person individually. Each person has his or her own breaking point, level of patience, degree of frustration and anger, etc. All of these aspects are taken into account and used to create the perfect test for us to grow in the areas we struggle in. Hashem sends us these purposely and they are only meant to help us. The key to it all, though, is the understanding that Hashem never sends us something that is impossible for us to overcome. Yes, things may be extremely difficult, and yes we will fail many times. However, Hashem never sets us up for guaranteed failure. Every nisayon (test) is with the trust and hope that we will make the right decisions and overcome it.

            Perhaps with this we could better understand the S’forno. Lot was clearly someone who was wicked and although he would never be able to withstand the types of tests that Avraham was challenged with, he was given his own little challenge – not to succumb to his rationalizations and thievery. Hashem sent Lot this test and alas he failed. However, the nisayon given to him was one he could have won; and had he passed the test and not succumbed to his wickedness, he would have grown and become a better person. However, had Hashem come to reinforce the message to Avraham, that he was to receive Eretz Yisroel, while Lot was still around, then Lot’s test would have become inaccurate and unfair because it would have been too difficult for him to hold himself back from stealing; and Hashem does not give us tests that we cannot pass.

            We must realize that Hashem is not out to get us and that all nisyonos sent our way are ones we are capable of passing. Bearing this in mind as we meet our challenges in whichever form they take, we could perhaps tip the scale in our favor and start off with a positive attitude and an even better shot at winning.



[1] Beraishis 13:7
[2] Rashi ibid.
[3] Beraishis 13:14
[4] Rashi ibid.
[5] Ibid.