Parshas
Vayeilech
and
Shabbos
Shuvah
The
Ripple Effect:
Splash
Out of Your Bubble or Take it to the Grave
By:
Daniel Listhaus
וַיֹּאמֶר
ה'
אֶל
מֹשֶׁה הִנְּךָ שֹׁכֵב עִם אֲבֹתֶיךָ
וְקָם הָעָם הַזֶּה וְזָנָה אַחֲרֵי
אֱלֹהֵי נֵכַר הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר הוּא בָא
שָׁמָּה בְּקִרְבּוֹ וַעֲזָבַנִי וְהֵפֵר
אֶת בְּרִיתִי אֲשֶׁר כָּרַתִּי אִתּוֹ
“Hashem
said to Moshe, 'Behold, you will lie with your forefathers, but this
people will rise up and stray after gods of that which is foreign to
the land, in whose midst it is coming, and it will forsake Me and it
will annul my covenant that I have sealed with it.'”
-Vayeilech
31:16
The
Gemara1
relates that a group of heretics asked Rabban Gamliel, “How do you
you know that Hashem will resuscitate the dead?” Rabban Gamliel
responded with a proof from Torah, a proof from Nevi'im
(Prophets), and a proof from K'suvim
(Writings)2,
however the heretics did not accept any of the proofs.
The
proof that Rabban Gamliel brought from Torah is from this week's
parsha.
The passuk3
(verse)
says that Hashem said to Moshe, “Behold you will lie with your
forefathers, but this people will rise up and stray after gods...”
This is the way the passuk
is
conventionally read and indeed the way which the trop
(cantillation marks)
of
the Torah directs us to understand. However, without any punctuation,
there is another way to read the passuk,
which clearly hints to the concept of techiyas
hamaysim (revival
of the dead), and that is the following: “Hashem said to Moshe,
'Behold you will lie with your forefathers and get up, but these
people will rise up and stray after gods...” Putting the comma
after the word “v'kum”
(“and will get up”), instead of before, changes the passuk's
meaning slightly to be dealing with two separate future events: A
time when Moshe will come back from the dead, as well as a time when
B'nei
Yisroel will
sin after entering Eretz
Yisroel.
The
problem with this Gemara
is
that the heretics seem to have had good reason not to listen to
Rabban Gamliel. Even without knowing what we do of the correct
punctuation in the passuk,
it would be a stretch to interpret the passuk
in
the way Rabban Gamliel suggested, because the construction of the
rest of the passuk
does
not allow for such an explanation. The passuk
is
grammatically written in such a way that the word “v'kum”
is clearly attached to the latter part describing the future mistakes
of B'nei
Yisroel.4
The
Kli
Yakar5
offers the following explanation. Oftentimes, we feel as if we are
living in a bubble. We think that the things we do and say effect no
one but ourselves and those who are directly impacted. Imagine a
principal who is lecturing a class not to cheat on tests. He might
argue “You are only hurting yourselves”, or may even extend the
discipline to say, “Even if one guy cheats, he is effecting his
classmates, who might then take cheating more lightly”. However,
rarely does the message include the friends of our friends who will
in turn be effected, no matter how slightly, and so on. If we stop to
think for a moment, there are in fact very few things we do which do
not have much broader impacts. A simple good morning or smile to
someone does not only change the attitude and behavior of the one
giving and receiving the gesture, but also extends to everyone that
each of them interact with for the rest of the day. This idea is
known as the ripple effect. Just as one could throw a rock in the
middle of a lake and watch the continuously spreading ripples, so to
a single action – no matter how small – spreads throughout
individuals, communities, and countries, for generations.
The
Gemara6
brings a statement from R' Yehuda in the name of Rav that a person
has the ability to live in two worlds simultaneously.7
The Gemara
explains
that this is possible because, for example, when a talmid
(student)
quotes his deceased rebbe,
it is as if the rebbe's
lips
are moving in the grave.8
The fact that someone has passed on does not mean that the ripples he
has left to spread, and seeds he has planted, go forgotten. Rather,
everything stemming from an individual gets attributed back to that
individual.
The
same, however, is true for the detriment. Someone who is the cause of
others committing aveiros
(sins) is responsible for those outcomes as well. And just as a
positive ripple effect could be caused by gathering others to do good
things, being a role model, or merely encouraging others, so too a
negative ripple effect could be caused by doing bad things with
others, being a bad example for friends, or merely not giving someone
proper mussar
(rebuke)
at an opportune time. All this gets attributed back to the
responsibility of the one who jumped into the water and started the
chain reaction.
With
this in mind, the Kli
Yakar writes
that we could now better appreciate the passuk
in
our parsha,
and
how it is indeed a valid source for techiyas
hamaysim in
the Torah without stretching the simple meaning. Hashem was telling
Moshe that for now you are going to be resting with your forefathers.
However, this people will later stray after other gods, and they will
come to awaken you because you will be held responsible. After all,
if B'nei
Yisroel turn
to avoda
zarah (idol
worship) in the future, that makes Moshe partially responsible for
not instilling the message deep enough. So, the passuk
is
telling us that there will be a later time when Moshe will indeed
return in body to us and we will go up to him. This demonstrates an
allusion to the concept of techiyas
hamaysim
from the Torah.
The
Gemara9
writes
that a whole year Hashem only accepts teshuva
(repentance)
from
the rabim
(public).
However, during the aseres y'mei teshuva (Ten Days of Repentance –
starting on Rosh Hashanah and continuing through Yom Kippur), Hashem
even accepts the teshuva of a yachid (individual). These are days
when Hashem is close to us, looks at us as individuals, and gives us
the opportunity to regret the sins of our past and accept on
ourselves to do better in the future. However, we must take a moment
to reflect what exactly we have done as individuals. We must realize
that we do not live in a bubble. Rather, we live in a place where our
actions have ripple effects. The consequences we cause will be
attributed back to us forever until the time of techiyas
hamaysim.
Therefore we must make sure that the impacts we create in this world
are indeed ones that we want to take to the grave.
May
we merit to only be the cause of positive consequences and achieve a
closeness with Hashem as he grants us a complete s'licha
u'mechila
on Yom
Kippur.
1Sanhedrin
90b
2The
three parts to Tanach. The
proof from Torah is from Devarim 31:16,
the proof from Nevi'im is
from Yeshaya 26:19,
and the proof from K'suvim is
from Shir HaShirim 7:10
3Devarim
31:16
4On
a simple level, the Ibn Ezra (31:16)
seems to express this opinion. However, see Avi Eizer
(31:16) who writes that it is
not possible that the Ibn Ezra would
write such a thing which goes against chazal – i.e.
the Gemara
in Sanhedrin (90b)
which clearly brings this passuk
as a real proof. The Avi Eizer therefore
explains the Ibn Ezra as
only asking on the way the trop
was placed.
5Devarim
31:16
6Yevamos
96b-97a
7As
seen in the passuk in
Tehillim (61:5)
8See
Shir Hashirim 7:10 which
alludes to this, as brought in the Gemara.
9Rosh
Hashanah 18a
Photo Credit: via Google Images: http://mycausewater.com/blog/the-ripple-effect/the-ripple-effect-2/
Photo Credit: via Google Images: http://mycausewater.com/blog/the-ripple-effect/the-ripple-effect-2/