Friday, April 15, 2016

Parshas Metzora - A Time to Tweet: Don’t Kill Two Birds with One Tone

~ Thoughts on the Parsha ~
Parshas Metzora


A Time to Tweet:
Don’t Kill Two Birds with One Tone
By: Daniel Listhaus

וְצִוָּה הַכֹּהֵן וְלָקַח לַמִּטַּהֵר שְׁתֵּי צִפֳּרִים חַיּוֹת טְהֹרוֹת וְעֵץ אֶרֶז וּשְׁנִי תוֹלַעַת וְאֵזֹב

“The Kohen shall command; and for the person being purified there shall be taken two live, pure birds, cedarwood, a crimson [tongue of] wool, and hyssop.”
-Metzorah 14:4
                                                                                     
After having detailed the characteristics of the various tzara’as afflictions that could appear on one’s body and clothing in Parshas Tazria, Parshas Metzorah opens with a description of the process for the metzorah (person with tzara’as) to become tahor (pure). Rashi[1] explains that each of the items required as part of the tahara process had a specific role and symbolization.

The first component listed in the passuk (verse) is the pair of birds. Rashi[2] comments that the reason why the Torah demands that the metzorah brings a karbon (offering) of birds is for the following reason: “Since the afflictions of tzara’as come about because of malicious talk, which is an act of verbal twittering, therefore, as part of the afflicted one’s purification, he is required to bring birds that constantly twitter with the sound of their chirping.”

The problem with this Rashi is that Rashi seems to conveniently leave out two important facts about this bird sacrifice. First, there were two birds required as part of the purification process; Rashi’s explanation only answers why the Torah requires the metzora to bring a bird as a karbon but falls short of clarifying why two birds are necessary. Why is it that the metzora needs to bring two birds as part of becoming tahor?

Second, the offering of these two birds is very different from all other karbanos. The passuk describes that only one bird was slaughtered as part of the karbon while the other bird was kept alive and set free over an open field to fly away. What is the purpose of catching a bird just to set it free? What does it represent? Furthermore, given Rashi’s explanation as to why the metzora was commanded to bring birds as his karbon, how could we understand this ritual of setting the bird free? If the whole purpose of bringing the birds was to serve as a final reminder to the metzora to think before he starts chirping like a bird with non-stop tweeting, then why was he commanded to set the second bird free? Wouldn’t that offset the role of slaughtering the first bird?

The Orchos Tzaddikim[3] writes[4] that the aveirah (sin) of lashon harrah (evil speech) is compared to the three cardinal aveiros: avodah zarrah (idol worship), shefichus damim (murder), and giluy araiyos (immoral relationships). At first glance it seems like quite an exaggerated comparison. After all, how could speaking badly about someone possibly compare to committing such horrific crimes? Yet, as the Orchos Tzaddikim explains, the comparison is not as extreme as it would appear in the overall scheme of things for a number of reasons. Besides for the gravity of the actual aveira of lashon harrah because of the tremendous damage it is capable of, it is also a very difficult aveirah to do teshuva for. First of all, like by all aveiros which are in the category of bein adom l’chaveiro (between man and his friend), it is not enough to go through the teshuva (repentance) process and ask forgiveness from Hashem. Hashem does not forgive aveiros bein adom l’chaveiro until one has first achieved mechilla (forgiveness) from the one who the person hurt. This makes doing a complete teshuva particularly difficult in the case of speaking lashon harrah because, being a “light mitzvah” which is transgressed by many on a constant basis, it is near impossible to remember everyone one ever spoke badly about – whether true or not – to be able to ask forgiveness from each one individually. Furthermore, unlike committing murder or many other aveiros which have immediate consequences and clear cause and effect chains and are therefore easier to regret right away, lashon harrah takes the form of merely speaking badly about another who is not necessarily even there when the initial lashon harrah is being said. All these factors put into perspective the seriousness of lashon harrah from a teshuva standpoint let alone all the global and perennial damage that the lashon harrah itself could do to a person’s reputation for generations.

            However, there is yet another aspect of lashon harrah which is often overlooked. If one stops for a moment and considers the aveiros that are done between man and a fellow man, there is more often than not a motive attached to the action done. Stealing, damaging, murdering, or committing any aveirah are often linked back to a flawed character trait. Perhaps there is jealousy or anger, perhaps lust or greed, but with little exception there is always something behind an action done. We must keep in mind though that it is a two-way street. Just as motives and flaws in one’s character lead to committing terrible aveiros, so too does giving in to these drives and turning them into actions further make the person more imperfect and increases the likelihood of repeating the aveiros in the future. As chazal teach us, “aveirah goreres avairah” (sins lead to more sins).

            This idea is in a way scarier when it comes to lashon harrah because oftentimes when lashon harrah is being said it is not necessarily done with any malicious intent. Sometimes people just start talking about other people and some things are good and some things are bad. There may be no surface jealousy, anger, or any reason per se` to be saying the lashon harrah other than for the sake of keeping a conversation interesting. Yet, it is important to bear in mind that the two-way relationship still exists and that as a result of merely speaking lashon harrah – an aveirah which at its core is an insensitivity to others and a general negativity – the one who speaks it or listens to it further becomes an insensitive person and one with a general negative outlook on the world. For example, the Orchos Tzaddikim relates a simple, but telling story of two people who were walking across a field and passed by a dead animal carcass. One person who was accustomed to speaking lashon harrah commented, “See how rotten and smelly this carcass is!” While the chochom (literally: wise one; here loosely means one who is more meticulous of mitzvos) who was with him observed, “Notice how white its teeth are!”

            One who accustoms himself to speaking and listening to lashon harrah simultaneously trains his head to be less sensitive to others and to see things in a more negative light. Such people enjoy searching for the dirt on people just as flies are attracted to filth and garbage.

            As the 2016 United States presidential race continues and some of the candidates become more hateful towards their competitors, the amount of bad-mouthing and dirt digging sharply increases. Past mistakes that were made, letters that were written, rules which were not followed – all begin to surface. Years worth of phone calls and emails which may have been recorded by someone and saved have a tendency to come back to haunt them while government records and tax reports are dusted off to re-examine.

As scary all this sounds, it is nothing compared to what presidential candidates in the year 2040 and beyond will have to worry about. With social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter being founded in the early 2000’s, when the year 2040 comes around, chances are that any given potential candidate will have tons of dirt and bad stuff to their name. Whether it be dumb comments or unflattering pictures, there will likely be more garbage that they will have to worry about going public then all presidential candidates before them combined had to worry about. However, the amazing thing is that a large chunk of it will not have originated by early enemies or opposing parties, but rather information which came from what was posted and volunteered by the closest friends of the candidates and the candidates themselves when they were younger. There is practically no filter of what people are willing to publicly post about themselves and their friends; not necessarily out of jealousy, anger, or anything other than fun, or more accurately – insensitivity to basic human respect and privacy. The more that is posted, the lower the standards drop and rubber-bands back to desensitize people even more to humiliating and debasing others.

Lashon harrah, like all speech, comes out through the mouth, but it really starts and ends in the head. One will say things based on his or her outlook, attitude, and mindset; and at the same time, what one says bounces back and reinforces the initial apathy towards debasing others while also setting a stronger foundation for one to have a negative perspective in general.

However, as is often the case, things that could be so destructive with one application could be powerfully constructive the other way as well. Words could be used in so many good ways to build self esteem and encourage others. The extent of goodness that that could reach has the potential to be just as great – spreading inspiration on a global scale as well as ripple effecting through generations. Perhaps this is the symbolism in the metzora’s tahara process. The requirement of bringing two birds – one to be slaughtered and the other to be set free, serves as a final reminder as the metzora prepares himself to rejoin k’lal Yisroel that we are tasked not just be extremely careful to stay away from lashon harrah, but even more – to try hard to say encouraging and nice things to people. In this way the former metzora could not just be a part of ensuring that society does not break down, but actually help in building it up and keeping it together and strong.

May Hashem help us during this time of Pesach and the upcoming days of sefiras ha’omeir, a time which reminds us year after year to work on our relationships bein adom l’chaveiro, to take the lesson of the metzora to heart and take at least a small step forward in being cognizant not just of what we say or spread about others but also what we say or spread about ourselves.




[1] Vayikra 14:4-6
[2] Vayikra 14:4 See also Gemara Arachin 15b
[3] Sha’ar Lashon Harrah
[4] Based on Gemara Aruchin

Friday, April 8, 2016

Parshas Tazria - The End is Near: “Game Over” or “Level Cleared”?

~ Thoughts on the Parsha ~
Parshas Tazria


The End is Near:
 “Game Over” or “Level Cleared”?
By: Daniel Listhaus

וַיְדַבֵּר ה' אֶל משֶׁה לֵּאמֹר: דַּבֵּר אֶל בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לֵאמֹר אִשָּׁה כִּי תַזְרִיעַ וְיָלְדָה זָכָר וְטָמְאָה שִׁבְעַת יָמִים כִּימֵי נִדַּת דְּו‍ֹתָהּ תִּטְמָא

“Hashem spoke to Moshe saying, 'Speak to the Children of Israel, saying: When a woman conceives and gives birth to a male, she shall be impure for a seven-day period, as during the days of her menstruant infirmity shall she be impure.'”
-Tazria 12:1-2

            Rashi[1] points out that only now after having discussed many of the details regarding bringing animals as karbanos (offerings) does the Torah teach about the very first halachos (laws) that apply at the beginning of every childbirth. Rashi brings from a medrash[2] that the reason for this order is because it is structured after the sequence of Beraishis (Creation). Just as the creation of man came after all the cattle, beasts, and fowl, so too the halachos pertinent to man are taught after those of animals.

            The question that this leads to, however, as the Sifsei Chachomim[3] asks, is why exactly is it that man was created after animals? The Sifsei Chochomim answers based on a gemara. The gemara[4] itself poses the question as to why man was created last, just hours before Shabbos. The gemara offers four answers. The first answer is in order to remove the possibility of people believing that man helped Hashem create the world. After all, if man was clearly not created until Friday after everything else, then it is impossible that man had anything to do with the creation of the world. The second answer suggested is that man was created last as a constant reminder, especially during times when we may feel haughty, that even the gnat was created before us. The third answer given is that man was created right before Shabbos in order that he be able to involve himself in a mitzva right away. The fourth answer the gemara offers is that man was created last because really the whole world was created for man and this way all of nature would be prepared for us.

            Having answered his side question, the Sifsei Chochomim asks on the medrash brought by Rashi that if indeed the Torah was structuring the many halachos of Sefer Vayikra based on the order of Beraishis, then why is it that Parshas Tazria comes before Parshas Metzora? After all, the halachos in Tazria deal with women whereas Metzora deals with laws subject to men. Adom was created before Chava and therefore Parshas Metzora should come before Parshas Tazria in the same way that the Parshiyos dealing with laws of animals come before the halachos dealing with people?

            The Sifsei Chochomim offers three answers, however we will focus on the first. The Sifsei Chochomim writes that the reason why the laws of Tazria are in the Torah before those of the Metzora is because it is much more common for a woman to give birth (tazria) than for a man to become a metzora (someone with tzara'as). This answer is simple enough. It is actually fairly common for the Torah to give preference in order to something that is more common. This concept is known as tadir v'she'aino tadir, tadir kodem – for example if one has before him two mitzvos, one of which is objectively done more often than the other, one should do the more regular one first and only afterward do the second. However, the words of the Sifsei Chochomim themselves are worth repeating that the answer as to why Parshas Metzora does not come before Parshas Tazria is because it is more common for a woman to give birth than for a man to become a metzora.

            Now-a-days we live in a world where exactly the opposite is true. Rarely does a day go by in the news without a mention of pushing the rights of women to be able to not have children; and when was the last day there was no story in the news of someone killing many people? Stabbings and shootings all over the country (let alone the world) of innocent people are things which we have become accustomed to and no longer even seem to faze young children. In a time when such activity is so prevalent, and lashon harrah is mass-produced and distributed instantly,  could we really be so sure that indeed now-a-days it is not the case that man becomes a “metzora[5] much more often than a woman gives birth? The metzora side is heavy - people degrade and belittle each other all the time in more and worse ways now than ever before. Simultaneously, the tazria side is light – it is no secret that America's birth rate is speedily decreasing to the point that it is now even an economic concern that a child born in 2015 will possibly be expected to carry twice the economic burden than one born in 1985.

            The world has become completely upside-down. The species of mankind has so deeply deteriorated that those who still represent what an “adom” are extremely far and few between. Those who are immersed in Torah study and work on their middos and connection to Hashem represent the last remnant of Adom.

            Last weekend,[6] William Kieren, a 79 year old man, was tragically killed in car accident on the highway. This accident was one like no other – Kieren was killed but his car did not have even the slightest scratch in it. As a matter of fact, his car was not even hit. No one was drunk, no one was on the phone while driving, and the car that killed him was completely in control. How did he die? William was driving along the dark Wyoming highway and noticed an injured rabbit in the middle of the road. So, he left his car on the side and walked to the center lane where the rabbit was and started to pick it up to save it from its imminent danger. Ironically, while doing so, he himself was hit by a car, whose driver could not make Kieren out in the dark. Kieren was sadly killed and although it was not mentioned, it could be assumed that the unlucky rabbit was as well.

            This story is a sad one indeed and for many it is still fresh in their minds. When reading this article, though, it is hard not to wonder what in the world he was thinking for getting out of his car in the middle of a highway to save the rabbit? Maybe he thought he would see any oncoming cars and be able to move out of the way in time, or perhaps there was some other rationale. There is no argument, however, that it was at best a case of safeik sakanas nefashos (a situation of a possible loss of human life). As a Torah Jew, there is very little demanded from one in a circumstance of possible loss of human life, and saving an injured animal is certainly not on that privileged list. Again, there is no humor in a nice 79 year old man dying no matter how it happened, but the fact that someone with so much life experience could make such a miscalculation is scary. Surely this comes from the double edged sword of two forces pulling at modern society. On the one side, the anthropomorphism-istic trend towards animal rights, and on the other, the devaluation of human life. These are perspectives which are so predominant in our times that they have become seemingly normal.

            On September 24, 2011 a 21 year old man by the name of C.J. Wickersham was a victim of a bull-shark attack. The good news is that he lived to tell the tale, something many with a shared experience do not. The bad news is that he lost a couple of body parts and is obviously not the same person physically or mentally that he was before. However, despite this man's traumatizing encounter, PETA thought it to be the opportune time to remind everyone to have the proper view of life. As Ashley Byrne, a PETA director, said, “We are glad that Mr. Wickersham is going to be okay, but we do hope that this painful and frightening experience makes him think about the pain and fear that he is causing to fish – and other fishermen are causing to fish.”

            The atmosphere modern society advocates of the devaluation of human life, is expressing itself in the types of debates that are being argued, the daily violence, and depression at early ages. Man was created last because the world was created for him. Granted there is a commandment not to destroy the world Hashem created for us[7] and that we are warned against tza'ar ba'alei chaim (paining creatures)[8], but equally is the charge for us to remain an Adom and utilize the world and its resources productively – for the use of man – even if there be a cost to the animals involved.[9] Yes, fish do need to be taken out of their habitat and killed for people to eat, but that is their purpose. The 'ethical perspectives' of our times are completely contrary to what was established as the baseline expectations of all mankind from the time of Beraishis.[10]

            May Hashem help us and the world at large realize how we are failing greatly in our role as adom. The world is completely upside-down and there is no doubt that the end is near. However let us make an effort to at least think about this and help change so that we do not have to end the world with a “game over” as reshaim who are not even holding on the level of basic Adom, but rather with a “level completed” as tzaddikim who recognize what it means to be an Adom and are therefore able to do teshuva.



[1]    Vayikra 12:1
[2]    Vayikra Rabbah 14:1
[3]    Vayikra 12:1
[4]    Sanhedrin 38a
[5]    Obviously there are no metzoras now because we no longer have tzara'as and there is no Beis Hamikdash with a Kohen  to declare it to be tamei or tahor. However, conceptually, the idea that people are constantly doing things that would be the cause of tzara'as and becoming a metzora is a very real one.
[6]    This was written April 2013
[7]    Devarim 20:19
[8]    See Gemara Bava Metzia 32a-33a which discusses whether this is a law from the Torah itself or a Rabbinic decree. Additionally see Gemara Berachos 40a which states that it is forbidden for a person to feed himself before his animals
[9]    Beraishis 1:26-30; See also Gemara Shabbos 129
[10]  See Beraishis 9:1-7

Friday, April 1, 2016

Parshas Shemini - Self Acceptance, Not Self Exceptance

~ Thoughts on the Parsha ~
Parshas Shemini

Self Acceptance, Not Self Exceptance
By: Daniel Listhaus

וַיֹּאמֶר משֶׁה אֶל אַהֲרֹן קְרַב אֶל הַמִּזְבֵּחַ וַעֲשֵׂה אֶת חַטָּאתְךָ וְאֶת עֹלָתֶךָ וְכַפֵּר בַּעַדְךָ וּבְעַד הָעָם וַעֲשֵׂה אֶת קָרְבַּן הָעָם וְכַפֵּר בַּעֲדָם כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוָּה ה'

“Moshe said to Aharon: Come near to the mizbe’ach and perform the service of your sin-offering and your olah-offering and provide atonement for yourself and for the people; then perform the service of the people’s offering and provide atonement for them, as Hashem commanded.”
 -Vayikra 9:7

            Rashi[1] in sefer Bamidbar describes that for the first seven days of the inauguration of the Mishkan, Moshe assembled and dismantled the Mishkan each day. On the eighth day however, which was Rosh Chodesh Nissan, Moshe erected the Mishkan and it remained in place until the anan (Cloud) moved indicating that it was time for B’nei Yisroel to travel. Our parsha opens by discussing the events that occurred on the “yom ha’shemini” (eight day of the inauguration) and relates that Moshe told Aharon that as the appointed Kohen Gadol, he was to bring a chatas and an olah on the mizbe’ach before Hashem. Rashi[2] points out that Moshe did not tell this to Aharon secretly, but rather in front of all of the zekainim (elders) of B’nei Yisroel to let them hear that it was Hashem Who declared that Aharon be the Kohen Gadol so that no one should think to say that Aharon just took the position for himself. Rashi[3] further relates that Hashem commanded Aharon to specifically bring a calf[4] as a karbon chatas in order to communicate that through this calf there would be a complete kaparah for his involvement in the eigel ha’zahav (sin of the golden calf).

            Interestingly, when Moshe finished giving his instructions, the Torah does not say straight out that Aharon went ahead and performed as Moshe had said. Rather, the passuk (verse) states, “Moshe said to Aharon: Come near to the mizbe’ach and perform the service of your sin-offering and olah-offering…” Why did Moshe have to repeat himself and seemingly have to “remind” Aharon to do what he had just asked him to do? Why didn’t Aharon just go and bring the chatas and olah as Moshe had just instructed? Why was there a need for Moshe to approach Aharon and say that he should go to the mizbe’ach?

            The Sifsei Chochomim[5] comments that this question is precisely the point which Rashi picks up on from this passuk. From the fact that Moshe had to tell Aharon to come close to the mizbe’ach implies that there was a level of hesitation on Aharon’s side which was preventing him from doing it on his own. Rashi[6] therefore explains that indeed despite Moshe clearly laying out what had to be done, Aharon was hesitant to go ahead and do so because he was embarrassed and afraid. Moshe encouraged Aharon that there was no reason to be embarrassed or afraid for Hashem Himself selected him to be the Kohen Gadol, therefore he should go ahead and approach the mizbe’ach.

            On the surface, this Rashi is difficult to understand. Certainly any person who has ever held a position could relate to being afraid and feeling incompetent and embarrassed on the first day of work, but that cannot be what is going on here. There is no question that Aharon must have felt the full effect of Yiras Hashem as he was thinking about bringing his karbanos, but that is not a reason to be hesitant when it comes to doing what Hashem asked. Awe is one thing, fear is another. If Aharon was hesitant to approach the mizbe’ach, there must have been something serious that was holding him back. What was it?

            The Da’as Zekainim[7] and the Chizkuni[8] both comment[9] that indeed there was a much bigger issue on Aharon’s mind. They explain that after Moshe told Aharon what to do, Aharon started going toward the mizbe’ach but looked up and saw the satan in the form of the eigel ha’zahav[10]. This caused Aharon to stop dead in his tracks and think to himself that perhaps he was not worthy to carry out this job as Kohen Gadol and that it be better for someone else to accept the position instead. When Moshe saw Aharon’s hesitation, he encouraged him and told him to keep walking toward the mizbe’ach because there was nothing to be afraid of since he was selected by Hashem.

            There are two basic questions on this story that come to mind. First, what did Moshe tell Aharon that he did not already know? Aharon knew that Hashem appointed him as Kohen Gadol, in fact everyone knew. It wasn’t that Moshe nominated Aharon for the position and now that Aharon was going through with it he was having second thoughts if he should really be the one chosen as Kohen Gadol. It was Hashem Himself who chose Aharon and not only did Aharon know this but all the zekainim and all of K'lal Yisroel knew this. So what did Moshe tell Aharon that he did not already know that would convince him to put his concern aside? Why would such a motivational speech work? Aharon was in fact Kohen Gadol until the day he died so what was it that he internalized during this conversation that convinced him to proceed?

            Second, how could we even understand the satan’s ploy? Why would it work to make Aharon doubt his worthiness due to the eigel? Rashi had explained that the very karbon he was bringing was representing the fact that Hashem forgave him completely for his personal involvement in the eigel. If in Aharon’s hands was literally the symbolism of Hashem accepting his full teshuvah (repentance), then what was the point of the satan using an outdated scheme? And the stronger question is of course, why did it in fact work to cause Aharon to hesitate?

            Perhaps we could better understand this episode with the following idea. As many know, there are multiple steps to the teshuva process. However, the teshuva process and all of its details really simplify to two main ideas: charata (regretting) on past behavior, and accepting to strive for good behavior in the future – charata al ha’avar v’kabbalah al ha’asid. The truth is, though, that there is a parallel version of teshuva which often gets forgotten. It gets forgotten even amongst those who live life with the purest intentions and know what it means to do real teshuva, and certainly amongst we who rationalize so many of the things we do, do teshuva once a year as part of the calendar, and are more inclined to think about and correct our errors in order to fit in socially and culturally than from introspection and becoming closer to Hashem. The parallel teshuva being referred to is that of forgiving oneself.

            Self acceptance and self forgiveness are absolutely essential for a person to be able to pick oneself up, brush off and keep on going. We are human and making mistakes is part of our DNA. We wake up late, make bad decisions, fail at what we try to do, hurt people, and forget important things. When these things happen, which they inevitably do, one could take one of two paths. On the one hand, one could look at the mess he or she is in and throw in the towel exclaiming, “What’s the point, I’ve already messed up today so the whole day is ruined.” “I already missed shacharis, so what’s the point of trying to make z’man kriyas shema?” “I already got upset today, so what’s the point trying to pretend I’m happy?” “I already ruined my project at home/school/work and am viewed as a failure so what’s the point trying to succeed?” “I have already slipped in one area of keeping Shabbos, so what’s the point of keeping kosher?” These are attitudes of dwelling in the past and not allowing oneself to move on. Of course one has to have the maturity and recognize one’s responsibility to acknowledge and accept making mistakes, and indeed one should feel bad for what he has done. However, after all that is done the final step is to overcome those feelings and actually use them as a springboard to motivate oneself to propel forward away from the spiral down and instead into the light of forgiveness and acceptance in order to have the energy to move forward. As people, and specifically as Jews, we not only have a duty to be good people in society and as b’nei Torah, not only have the obligation to recognize when we do things wrong and be accepting of judgment while we do teshuva, but we are also obligated to forgive ourselves and not dwell on our mistakes after Hashem has forgiven us, or even before to the extent that it grows from a charata to a feeling of hopelessness which prevents us from doing other things which we are supposed to do.

            When Aharon was appointed Kohen Gadol and was commanded to bring the karbanos on the mizbe’ach, it is true that he knew as well as everyone else that indeed he was chosen by Hashem to fill the position. Aharon had done teshuva for his involvement in the eigel ha’zahav and Hashem accepted the teshuva, but deep inside Aharon never felt over it. Despite having received teshuva, the knowledge that he had been willing to stoop so low to be involved in the eigel was something that he himself could not let go of so easily. The satan sensed this in Aharon and used that false image against him solidifying the idea in his head that the sin of the eigel was a stain that could never be washed away and therefore he was unworthy of doing anything to serve Hashem. This is precisely what Moshe realized and therefore told Aharon to approach the mizbe’ach, saying, “Go to the mizbe’ach! There is nothing to fear. After all, the whole reason to have charata about the eigel is because you sinned against Hashem, but it is Hashem Himself Who appointed you, Aharon, as kohen gadol and accepted your complete teshuva! What right do you have to be more machmir (strict) than Hashem? Is it Hashem that you are sorry you sinned against, or yourself?” With this reminder that he was misusing his middah of charata, Aharon indeed realized something that although he already knew was not yet internalized -  that Hashem had in fact forgiven him and if he would allow his own guilt to prevent him to do what Hashem was now commanding him to do, that itself would be a sin against Hashem.

            If a tzaddik like Aharon Ha’kohen could do everything in his power to achieve teshuva gemurah and yet still feel bad for the sin that he committed to the point that a feeling of hopelessness comes over and snowballs into potentially further heading down a dark path, then certainly when it comes to a regular person, one is susceptible to come out of a mess up in one area of life and allow it to snowball into a never ending chain of giving up with the thought of: “Once I already messed up A, what’s the point of even trying B?”.

            How many times do we find ourselves using the sentence pattern: “I would _______, except that I (am/did) _______”. Are these statements true? Or are they at their core a level of justification while one is entrapped in feelings of hopelessness?


            May Hashem help us not only be able to recognize our faults and do an honest teshuva, but also aid us so that we don’t get improperly stuck in the muck of charata to the point that it stops us from propelling ourselves forward. In the zechus (merit) of us doing the first steps of accepting responsibility and making growth-oriented goals for the future, may Hashem give us the strength to become accustomed to saying “I will” instead of “I would, except that…” so that we will achieve self acceptance and not fall into the downward spiral of hopelessness and self “exceptance”.




[1] Rashi Bamidbar 7:1
[2] Rashi Vayikra 9:1
[3] Ibid
[4] The karbon chatas was usually not a calf.
[5] Vayikra 9:7
[6] Rashi ibid
[7] Ibid
[8] Ibid
[9] See also the Ba’al Ha'Turim (9:7) who explains along similar lines that Aharon was afraid because of the cheit ha’eigel. However instead of writing that the satan appeared in the image of an eigel, he writes that Aharon saw the corners (karnei) of the mizbe’ach and saw it as the horns (karnei) of an ox.
[10] The Da’as Zekainim just say “appearance of an eigel”, but the Chizkuni writes, “like the appearance of the eigel”.