Friday, October 27, 2017

Parshas Lech Lecha - Test by Design

~ Thoughts on the Parsha ~
 Parshas Lech Lecha
L'iluy nishmas Calev ben Amitai Yoel Ha'kohen

 
Test by Design
By: Daniel Listhaus

 וַה' אָמַר אֶל אַבְרָם אַחֲרֵי הִפָּרֶד לוֹט מֵעִמּוֹ שָׂא נָא עֵינֶיךָ וּרְאֵה מִן הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר אַתָּה שָׁם צָפֹנָה וָנֶגְבָּה וָקֵדְמָה וָיָמָּה: כִּי אֶת כָּל הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר אַתָּה רֹאֶה לְךָ אֶתְּנֶנָּה וּלְזַרְעֲךָ עַד עוֹלָם:

“Hashem said to Avram after Lot had parted from him, ‘Raise now your eyes and look out from where you are: northward, southward, eastward, and westward. For all the land that you see, to you will I give it, and to your descendants forever. ”
-Lech Lecha 13:14-15

            The Torah[1] relates that Lot’s shepherds of Lot started quarreling with the Avraham’s shepherds. Rashi[2] explains that the cause of the dispute was that Lot’s shepherds would graze their cattle in the fields of others, and Avrahams’s shepherds would rebuke them saying that they were stealing by allowing their animals to graze in other’s fields. However, Lot’s shepherds would just rationalize and retort that the land [Eretz Yisroel] was promised to Avraham, and being that he has no heir, Lot’s family would inherit it so it is not really stealing. This of course was nothing more than a rationalization because as the next passuk (verse) says, “The Canaanite and Perizzite were then dwelling in the land”, so Avraham did not yet have possession of it. As we know, this argument resulted in Lot separating from Avraham and moving to Sodom.

            The passuk[3] tells us that right after Lot parted from Avraham, Hashem came to Avraham and told him to look around in all four directions, that all the land he could see will be his and his descendents forever. Rashi[4] is bothered by why the Torah feels it necessary to stress the fact that it was specifically right after Lot left Avraham that Hashem came to speak to him. Rashi answers that the entire time Lot was with Avraham, Hashem did not speak to Avraham because Lot was wicked.

            The S’forno, however, has a different approach. The S’forno[5] writes that the reason Hashem waited to tell this to Avraham until after Lot left was because Hashem was concerned that had He come to Avraham while Lot was still around, the reinforced message that Eretz Yisroel would be given to Avraham would have caused Lot and his shepherds to become haughty and feel that they already owned the place and make themselves comfortable, stealing whatever they wanted. Therefore, Hashem waited for Lot to leave before he spoke to Avraham and showed him all the land He promised to him and his descendents.

            The obvious problem with this S’forno is that Hashem’s plan did not seem to work. The S’forno is saying that Hashem waited for lot to leave Avraham in order to speak to him because He did not want Lot to come to steal. However, that happened anyway! The whole reason why Lot and Avraham split up was because of the fighting that Avraham’s shepherds had with Lot’s to try to get them to stop stealing others’ property. So what did Hashem gain – so to speak – by waiting for Lot to leave in order to speak to Avraham? It seems like either way Lot ended up feeling that he had divine rights to Eretz Yisroel?

            The purpose of life and G-d’s role in this world are topics that have been debated by philosophers for centuries. There are so many levels of belief each varying when it comes to understanding these core questions. Some believe that the world was created by accident and that humans are a product of chance. Therefore, by definition, life has no purpose, ethics, morals, or expectations other than those made up by man in order to live together under the same sky. Others believe that G-d put us here for His entertainment, which does not either even deserve a refutation. We as Jews however not only hold onto Judaism – the Torah she’bichsacv (Written Torah), the Torah she’ba’al peh (Oral Torah), and our mesorah (tradition) – as a religion, but rather even more, that it contains in it the chochmah (wisdom) and insight into the purpose of mankind and the world as a whole with an order and system to everything – even including things as basic as thought, speech and the most mundane of actions such as which shoe lace to tie first. Not only is the world and everything in it purposeful, but Hashem’s involvement is intricate and intimate.

            As a person lives through life, he or she is inevitably met with struggles and challenges. Sometimes these challenges are in the form of a spiritual struggle bein adom l’makom. Other times it is an interpersonal struggle bein adom l’chaveiro. Sometimes we are challenged financially, sometimes physically, and other times mentally or emotionally. And often times we could even prove to be our own worst enemies and have internal struggles which eat us up alive.

Although to point to a single idea and declare it as the purpose of life is way beyond the scope of this d’var Torah, what we could do as at least understand that there is a purpose which exists and that life’s challenges are not only a necessary means to achieve that purpose, but that life’s challenges are actually hand-picked for us individually by Hashem Himself. Hashem understands our nature perfectly, for he created us. Therefore it is He alone who is able to construct the perfect challenges for us to overcome and grow from. Hashem knows the different measures of the various middos (character traits) He injected in each person individually. Each person has his or her own breaking point, level of patience, degree of frustration and anger, etc. All of these aspects are taken into account and used to create the perfect test for us to grow in the areas we struggle in. Hashem sends us these purposely and they are only meant to help us. The key to it all, though, is the understanding that Hashem never sends us something that is impossible for us to overcome. Yes, things may be extremely difficult, and yes we will fail many times. However, Hashem never sets us up for guaranteed failure. Every nisayon (test) is with the trust and hope that we will make the right decisions and overcome it.

            Perhaps with this we could better understand the S’forno. Lot was clearly someone who was wicked and although he would never be able to withstand the types of tests that Avraham was challenged with, he was given his own little challenge – not to succumb to his rationalizations and thievery. Hashem sent Lot this test and alas he failed. However, the nisayon given to him was one he could have won; and had he passed the test and not succumbed to his wickedness, he would have grown and become a better person. However, had Hashem come to reinforce the message to Avraham, that he was to receive Eretz Yisroel, while Lot was still around, then Lot’s test would have become inaccurate and unfair because it would have been too difficult for him to hold himself back from stealing; and Hashem does not give us tests that we cannot pass.

            We must realize that Hashem is not out to get us and that all nisyonos sent our way are ones we are capable of passing. We are tasked to keep davening for Hashem’s help in all that we do and put in our hishtadlus in meeting our challenges in whichever form they may take. They will be hard, they will take effort, we won’t always know why, and they will be life changing; they have to be. However, perhaps even harder than the challenges themselves is mentally and emotionally accepting our nisyonos and yisrurin with a love. A love that Hashem feels that we and our tefillos are worth specifically paying attention and tailor-designing the obstacle course of life at precisely the right level.

            May we be zocheh to overcome all of our own personal nisyonos and yisurin, achieve the level of channeling the emotional efforts required to overcome them into acceptance instead of doubt, fear, or anger, and to in fact be zocheh for Hashem to answer “yes” to our tefillos during our most critical times of need.




[1] Beraishis 13:7
[2] Rashi ibid.
[3] Beraishis 13:14
[4] Rashi ibid.
[5] Ibid.


Friday, October 20, 2017

Parshas Noach - Parsha Stumpers

~ Something to Think About ~

פרשת נח

Parsha Stumpers

By: Daniel Listhaus
                                              A Riddle:
    סוף סוף ראשי     1.
  תחילת סוף סופי     
    ויבא נח...אל התבה      
            מי אני?ג    

  1. (6:9) Where is there a remez in the beginning of the parsha that Noach was not involved in any of these three things?

  1. (6:9) Rashi brings down an opinion that Noach was only great compared to those who lived in his generation, but had he lived in Avraham’s generation he wouldn’t have been anything remarkable. Why would we compare an individual to others? All that should matter was if Noach was righteous based on expectations of him alone, not based on what others are capable of?

  1. (6:13) How could the dor ha'mabul be punished if there were no mitzvos yet? [Chizkuni]

  1. (6:13) Rashi writes that because of the zenus of the generation, the gezairah (decree) was that all mankind – good and bad – were to die. Why should the good people be swept along with the bad?

  1. (6:13) Rashi says that despite all the things that the dor ha'mabbul were doing, the gezairahwas sealed because of robbery. Why robbery more than avodah zarrah or giluy arayos?

  1. (6:14) Why did Hashem have Noach building the teivah specifically for 120 years and no more or less?

  1. (6:14) According to Chizkuni that there was a miracle that the tar on the outside didn’t get burned, why couldn’t Hashem allow Noach’s teivah to be like Moshe’s with only tar on the outside and double-dip on the already necessary neis for either the outer tar not to get ruined in the hot water or for the protective layer of cold water whyich surrounded the teivah to separate it from the boiling water?

  1. (6:17) Why did Hashem punish the world through means of a mabbul of water?

  1. (6:18) Rashi emphasizes the two parts of the “bris” with Noach as a promise to keep the food from spoiling and to protect him from the people who would try to kill him.
a. Why was the promise only needed to ensure that the food stay good in the teivah?
b. Didn’t Hashem on His own want to stop the people who dared threaten Noach (as Rashi says in 7;17)?

  1. (7:2) Even if Noach needed to bring Karbanos after surviving the mabbul, why were 7 pairs of      each kosher animal necessary?

  1. (7:4) Why does Rashi refer to the children of the adulterous unions at the time of the mabbul as “mamzeirim”? Isn’t that specifically if the parents are Jewish?

  1. (7:7) Rashi both in 6:18 and 7:7 writes that it was forbidden to have marital relations in theteivah. However, Rashi in 7:7 adds that the reason for this was because the world was in a state of distress...
(a) Why does Rashi repeat himself?  (b) Why does Rashi in 7:7 add the reason? (c ) Why is this a valid reason? Clearly the people dying in the mabbul deserved it. Shouldn't it have been considered a “joyous” time for the world?

  1. (7:12) Where do we see from this week's parsha that the day starts at night? Why is it that there is a concept of miktzas hayom k'kulo only if the night is part of the “miktzas”, yet if have even the full day without the preceding night, this concept is not applicable?

  1. (7:17) The Torah uses the phrase בעצם היום הזה in this week's parsha as well as three other times in chumash in the same way. Where are these four times [Beraishis 7:17 ; Beraishis 17:37 ; Shemos 12:21 ; Devarim 32:48] and what is the connection between them?

  1. (7:17-20 and 8:4) The teivah was submerged 11 amos and the water came above the highest mountains by 15 amos. It comes out that there was always a minimum of 4 amos between the bottom of the teivah and the ground. Why was this necessary? Do these 4 amos have a particular significance?

  1. (7:23) Why did Og get Saved? How did he survive being outside of the teivah?

  1. (7:23) Rashi writes that about Noach it is written (Mishlei 11:31), “Behold the righteous one is paid [punished] on earth” referring to the fact that he was bitten by the lion in the teivah. What was he punished for?

  1. (8:7) Why did Noach send out the raven and the dove? Why not just trust that Hashem would tell him when to come out of the teivah?

  1. (8:8) Why did Noach assume that if the dove found land that it wouldn’t return the teivah where its species was?

  1. (8:10-11) The passukim describe that the second time Noach sent out the dove, it came back with an olive branch in its mouth. Rashi comments that the dove was trying to tell Noach the following: “Better let my food be bitter as an olive and provided by the hand of Hashem, and not sweet as honey but provided by the hand of man...” (a) The dove should have had hakarashatov to Noach and his family. Why at the first opportunity does the dove say such a remark? (b ) The dove's statement makes absolutely no sense! The entire time Noach and the animals were in the teivah they experienced open miracles. The whole teivah was something which opposed teva. Wasn't it pretty apparent that Hashem was present every step of the way?

  1. (8:14) Rashi writes that the world needed a complete solar year of destruction, yet Rashi said earlier (7:12 #2) that the first day didn’t count because it wasn’t a complete day without the night before. If so, how was there a complete year of destruction?

  1. (8:21) Surely Hashem knew even before the mabbul that people are bad from youth. So, either way – if that’s not a reason to destroy the world then why did Hashem destroy it? And if it is a valid reason then why never again? What changed? Also, what is the connection between this “decision” and the fact that it seems to have been decided as a result of Hashem “smelling” the re’ach hane’choach of Noach’s offering?

  1. (9:1) Why did Hashem need to give Noach a beracha that the animals would fear him? Wasn't this already built into the world from the sheishes y'mei beraishis?

  1. (9:9) Why did Hashem approve of Noach’s necessity to demand a bris if Hashem had commanded him already to have children in 9:1?

  1. (9:24) How did Noach know it was Cham who dishonored him?

  1. (9:25) Did Noach do the right thing by cursing Cna'an?

  1. (9:25-26) Why did Noach have to curse Cham’s children to be slaves to his brother, and also bless Shem that Cham be his slaves? Wouldn’t one of these be enough?

  1. (11:1) One of the reasons Rashi gives as the reason behind why the dor haflaga began to build the tower is because they thought that the world was on a cycle that every 1656 years Hashem wold bring another flood, so they wanted to be prepared with supports for the skies. If so, why was Hashem so upset? Why not just let the people think this incorrectly as long as they aren't bothering anyone?

  1. If the dor haflaga wanted to 'wage war' with Hashem, why did they buildמגדל  בבל  in a valley? They should have built it on top of a mountain!?


  1. (11:28) Rashi brings down the story from the famous medrash how Haran (Avraham's brother) stood and observed the episode of Avraham being thrown into the fiery furnace. Haran decided that Avraham's fate would determine his own faith in Hashem. The medrash continues that indeed when Avraham emerged unscathed, Haran joined his side and was consequentially thrown into the fire – and burned to death. What did Haran do wrong? The Ramban at the end of Parshas Bo writes that Hashem does not perform miracles for every kofeir that decides not to believe in Hashem. This is why we have t he Torah and mitzvos which direct us to remember Yetziyas Mitzrayim and Kriyas Yam Suf as a forever certificate      of Hashem's capabilities. Haran obviously lived before matan Torah and kriyas yam suf, so what was so bad with him wanting to see Hashem perform an open miracle first before fully believing in Hashem? 

Parshas Noach - Peace Is Not So Easily Disturbed

~ Thoughts on the Parsha ~
Parshas Noach


Peace Is Not So Easily Disturbed
By: Daniel Listhaus

וַיְהִי כָל הָאָרֶץ שָׂפָה אֶחָת וּדְבָרִים אֲחָדִים
“The whole earth was of one language and of unified words.”
-Noach 11:1

The Torah[1] tells us that a mere 340 years after the mabbul (great flood), the people of the world joined together with a plan of action to rebel against Hashem. As Rashi[2] elaborates, the people blasphemously declared, “G-d does not have the right to select the Higher realms for Himself alone. We will go up to the firmament and wage war with him”. In response to their thoughts and actions, Hashem said, “Behold one people, and there is one language for all of them, and this is what they begin to do! And now, should it not be withheld from them all they proposed to do? Come, let us descend and confuse their language, that they should not understand one another’s language.”

Rashi[3] points out that the sin of the dor haflagah (Generation of the Disunion) by building Migdal Bavel (Tower of Babylon) and arrogantly rebelling against Hashem was a far worse sin than the sins committed by the dor ha’mabul (Generation of the Flood). After all, the members of the dor haflagah went against fundamental beliefs in Hashem, whereas the people living at the time of the mabul just had no respect for one another. With this difference in mind it is difficult to understand why it is that the dor ha’mabul was completely obliterated from the world while those who lived during the dor haflagah were kept alive. Rashi explains that the reason for this is because there was a big difference between the two generations. The people living during the dor ha’mabul were robbers and there was much hostility between them, whereas the dor haflagah behaved toward one another amiably. This teaches us the amount of credit that Hashem gives those who are at peace as opposed to those who are constantly engaged in conflict.

As one reads about the actual punishment given to the dor haflagah and the immediate results of the punishment a question comes to mind. Rashi[4] tells us that immediately after Hashem confused their languages, things quickly went out of control. As Rashi writes, “This one would ask for a brick, and that one would bring him plaster, and the first one would rise against him and split open his head for not bringing him the brick he asked for.” The question which begs to be asked is why would Hashem punish the dor haflagah in this way by not only foiling their plans but also ruining the peace that they had maintained, which Hashem Himself commended? The fact that the dor haflagah got along well with each other was their one redeeming quality which was the reason Hashem chose not to wipe them out as He had done during the dor ha’mabul. So why did Hashem’s intervention to stop them from building Migdal Bavel have to include disturbing the peace? Instead of causing them to not speak the same language why not stop them through others means such as making them forget what they were doing, cause them to get sick, or turn the ground into quicksand and cause their project to repeatedly fail until they give up? Surely Hashem could have chosen one of countless other ways to ruin their agenda without disturbing the peace and putting into motion a community of conflicts harboring thieves and murderers as the dor ha’mabul had been?

Imagine the scene which Rashi illustrated that occurred at Migdal Bavel seconds after Hashem confused their languages. One person, who suddenly finds himself only able to speak Chinese, asks for a brick. The other, suddenly only able to comprehend Swahili, looks at his friend with a look of absolute confusion but makes an effort and brings him plaster. Caught in frustration and rage, the Chinese-speaking asker kills his friend for not getting him what he had asked for. Why should that have happened? These two guys were friends with each other just moments earlier and they both understood quite well what had happened at this point – Hashem had intervened and caused them all to only remember how to speak one language[5] – each different from each other. If so, why could they not just understand this and stop the project with the realization that they would be unable to effectively continue? Why did they begin fighting with one another?

Perhaps the answer is quite simple. Hashem did not cause them to become hostile toward each other; all Hashem did was foil their plans by making them all understand different languages. The result of them becoming argumentative and hot-tempered was something which had really been there all along. Their conflicts were put aside and their patience with each other lasted as long as they had a common goal that they needed each other’s help with. However the peace was selfish. It may have been a better environment than the one generated from the dor ha’mabul, but it was only on the surface. As soon as Hashem removed their ability to complete their plans, they went back to their default of allowing their extreme selfishness – a selfishness encapsulated by the event of a clear inability to communicate leading to murder – to express itself openly. It’s not that Hashem punished above and beyond and not only ruined their blasphemous scheme but also disturbed the peace, rather it was the foiling of the plan alone which lifted the temporary peace which the people had as they put aside their conflicts to join for a common goal. Although that temporary serenity might have been enough for them to escape total annihilation that the dor ha’mabul received, it was still not real shalom (peace), because had it been real shalom, the friendships and peace would have held despite the language barriers.[6]

            This idea is one we should think about regarding our own relationships. Are our current relationships being maintained only because of selfish reasons or a common goal? What would happen if the goal would be reached or abandoned? What would happen if there would be a miscommunication, would things be worked out or would the parties just blame each other? Is the relationship weakly surviving remaining as a step above conflict in order to fight a common enemy or is the relationship thriving irrespective of anything other than pure love and care for the other?

Unfortunately through the ages K’lal Yisroel has needed constant reminders via attacks on Jews, albeit out of love of Hashem, that we as a nation are not segmented but rather one unit. Now as the extreme Arab community threatens us again, as crazy as they are and as horrible as the actions they do, the one good that comes out is that they remind us loud and clear that they are not makpid (particular) what country a Jew comes from or what his or her background might be. We must adopt this policy upon ourselves as well – except with its application to peace and not twisted violence. We must love and care for all of K’lal Yisroel not just during the times when we have selfish ulterior motives or when we share a common goal or enemy, but rather by default. It should not be an external factor uniting us, as was the case by the dor haflagah, instead we should feel internally and eternally united on levels much deeper than any worldly shared goal or common enemy.

May Hashem help us keep in mind, as we daven and learn for peace in Yerushalayim and the world, that despite the 12 windows which could be found in our shuls and batei medrashos representing the different angles and personalities of the shevatim (tribes), that all the tefillos (prayers) go to the same place. We all have our slight differences in minhagim (customs) and mehalchim (ways) how we best serve Hashem, learn His Torah, and lead our lives, but deep down we must never forget that we are all one unit and that when there is any sort of tension within the unit, it is on each person to take responsibility out of love and care and not selfishly transfer the blame upon others. In this zechus (merit) of uniting out of love and not just as a result of sharing a common enemy may Hashem see that His children are indeed ready to greet the Moshiach.




[1] Beraishis 11:1
[2] Rashi ibid.
[3] Rashi Beraishis 11:9
[4] Rashi Beraishis 11:7
[5] See Chizkuni who writes that Hashem didn’t create the 70 languages then and there, rather all languages already existed and everyone spoke and fully understood all the languages. When Hashem confused the languages He caused each person to forget all languages except one.  
[6] This is what the passuk means when it describes their unity as, “…of one language and of unified words…” It was the words alone which unified them. 

Wednesday, October 4, 2017

Parshas Ve’zos Ha’Beracha - B for Effort

~Thoughts on The Parsha     ~
Parshas Ve’zos Ha’Beracha

  

B for Effort
By: Daniel Listhaus

וּלְכֹל הַיָּד הַחֲזָקָה וּלְכֹל הַמּוֹרָא הַגָּדוֹל אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה משֶׁה לְעֵינֵי כָּל יִשְׂרָאֵל

“…And for all the strong hand, and for all the great awesomeness that Moshe performed before the eyes of all Yisroel

-Ve’zos Ha’Berachah 34:12

After restating the uniqueness and greatness of Moshe rabbeinu, the very last passuk (verse) of the Torah states, “…And for all the strong hand and for all the great awesomeness that Moshe performed before the eyes of all Yisroel”.[1] Rashi[2] comments that when the passuk says “the strong hand”, it refers to Moshe’s receiving the luchos with his hands. The Sifsei chachomim[3] further explains that indeed it took a strong hand to be able to carry the luchos, as the luchos were extremely heavy.

This Rashi presents a difficult problem. We know that during the B’neio Yisroel’s traveling in the midbar (desert), the aron, which held the luchos, carried itself, requiring no effort to be put in to carry it. This was certainly also true when Moshe received the luchos originally from Hashem.[4]  If so, how could we understand the passuk? How does Moshe’s ability to carry the luchos demonstrate his incredible physical strength? The luchos might have technically been extremely heavy, but they were also weightless! If Moshe did not have to put any effort into carrying the luchos then why does the passuk point to the event as a display of Moshe’s strong hand?

Perhaps the answer to this could be found based on a fundamental concept regarding hilchos succah.

The Tur[5] brings down from the passuk[6] that the yom tov of Succos is strongly connected to yetzias Mitzrayim (exodus from Egypt)Specifically, the physical huts (succos) that we dwell in for the duration of yom tov is to commemorate the ananei ha’kavod (clouds of glory) that Hashem had surrounding the B’nei Yisroel to protect them in the midbar. The Beis Yosef writes this as well and maintains this opinion in Shulchan Aruch[7] where he writes specifically that the mitzva we have to build a succah is to represent the ananei ha’kavod that accompanied us in the midbar for protection.

However, it would seem that this is more than an explanation, but an actual p’sak (ruling). After all, the reason for the mitzva of succah is actually a machlokes tanaim (tannaic dispute) brought in the Gemara[8] between Rebbe Eliezer and Rebbe Akiva. Rebbe Eliezer holds that indeed the mitzva of succah is a physical representation of the ananei ha’kavod. Rebbe Akiva, however, argues and maintains that the mitzvah of succah is to recall the actual huts which B’nei Yisroel dwelled in while in the midbar. The Chayei Odom[9] points out that the passuk in Vayikra[10] which commands the mitzva of succah, actually refers to the succos of the midbar twice, one time chaseir (literally, “missing” i.e – without the letter vuv) and the second time malei (literally, “complete” i.e – with a letter vuv). The reason for this, as he explains is to refer to the two types of succos that we had in the midbar – the protection of the ananei ha’kavod as well as the physical huts that B’nei Yisroel constructed.

If we take a step back and try to imagine the discussion that must have taken place between Rebbe Eliezer and Rebbe Akiva, it is hard to comprehend how Rebbe Akiva could maintain the position that the commandment of succah is solely to recall the actual huts we lived in while traveling in the midbar. Especially compared to the option of the succah representing the ananei ha’kavod, how could we understand what was so special about the huts we lived in that would be worth recalling for generations as the central reason for celebrating Succos with the succos that we build?

            As an approach to try to answer this question, an even more fundamental question must be raised. It is unlikely that Rebbe Eliezer and Rebbe Akiva are arguing about facts of what the B’nei Yisroel had in the midbar. Rather both agree that the ananei ha’kavod were present and both agree that the B’nei Yisroel dwelled in huts. Their argument is solely what the passuk is referring to as the reason for the annual commandment to build a succah. If so, the question which begs to be asked is why the B’nei Yisroel needed to build succos in the midbar at all? Furthermore, Rashi[11]when explaining Rebbe Akiva’s opinion that the mitzva of succah is to recall the actual succos, writes that B’nei Yisroel built the succos in the midbar to protect themselves from the elements. Why was this necessary? The ananei ha’kavod already did this for them and so much more! Leaving aside the machlokes as to why we have the mitzvah of succah, how could we even understand the fact that the B’nei Yisroel felt it necessary to build huts to protect them?

The Medrash[12] describes that there were four kings who were faced with battle, but who each approached the circumstance differently in terms of their personal physical commitment and their complementary tefillos (prayers). The four kings were Dovid Ha’melech, Asa, Yehoshafat, and Chizkiyahu. Dovid Ha’melech said, “I will pursue my enemies and overtake them, and will not return until they are destroyed”[13]  The passuk[14] confirms that Dovid’s tefillah was answered. When Asa was faced with the possibility of war, he stood up and davened saying, “I do not possess the strength to kill them, rather I will pursue them and You (Hashem) will kill them.” The passuk[15] confirms that Asa’s tefillos were answered. The medrash continues that when Yehoshafat was pulled into battle he declared, “I do not possess the strength to pursue or to kill, I will just sing shirah (songs of praise) to You (Hashem), and You (Hashem) will wage the war.” Again, the passuk[16] confirms that Yehoshafat’s tefillos were answered as well. The medrash concludes by relating that when Chizkiyahu was faced with war he said, “I do not possess the strength to pursue or to kill or even to sing shirah, I am going to go to sleep while You (Hashem) wage war.” Again, the passuk[17] testifies that Chizkiyahu’s tefillos were answered.

In all four cases, each of their tefillos was answered and their respective battles were successfully victorious. However, the difference between their methods is quite clear. Dovid Ha’melech’s tefillos seem to state more dependency on what we may term as his own hishtadlus (effort) rather than pure bitachon (faith) in Hashem, whereas on the other side of the spectrum, Chizkiyahu seems to be completely depending on Hashem’s intervention while exerting no effort himself at all. At first glance it would appear that the medrash is listing four scenarios with increasing levels of trust in Hashem. The reality, however, is exactly the opposite.

The Chovos Halevavos[18] writes that pure bitachon does not stop at “blind faith”. Rather, the highest form of bitachon actually demands taking initiative and pursuing needs. As a simple example the Chovos Halevavos writes that despite the fact that the length of a person’s life is determined by Hashem, one must still pursue the necessary means of sustenance such as food, drink, clothing and shelter. He continues to bring examples from tanach[19] where people of great bitachon still made statements seemingly doubting Hashem’s control of the world. As he explains, there is a difference between statements made out of lack of faith in Hashem, and those made because of full faith in Hashem with the understanding that as humans, our expression of bitachon is translated into our hishtadlus. The action or declaration may at times look the same, but the potential reasons behind them are worlds apart.

This idea is not a foreign one. The Gemara[20] relates that at the time of kriyas yam suf (splitting of the sea) before the sea split B’nei Yisroel had to enter. No one was willing to step into the yam suf until Nachshon ben Aminadav did so at which time the sea split. The question is that if the sea was going to have to split either way, why not just split? The answer is that although it may sound counter intuitive, the truth is that full bitachon requires full hishtadlus. It is precisely the involvement in this world with the understanding that despite our efforts everything comes from Hashem, which is true bitachon. Despite the inevitable miracle which was going to occur, it was necessary for us to put in the hishtadlus of walking into the sea nose-deep to demonstrate the investment of bitachon in our physical world.

This idea is parallel to the consecutive steps mentioned in Mesillas Yesharim based of the beraisa of Rebbe Pinchas ben Yair that the level of kedusha (Holiness) - being able to take mundane things to utilize for Holy purpose is actually a loftier level than p’rishus - abstaining from physical pleasures of the world altogether.

With this understanding perhaps we could better understand what was going on in the midbar right after yetziyas mitzrayim. The succos we built at the time of exiting mitzrayim were simultaneously not unnecessary at all and non-indicative of lack of trust in the Hashem's protection of us with the ananei Ha’kavod. Rather, they were our expression of hishtadlus coupled with bitachon that we had complete trust in Hashem that we will survive and that despite the building of  huts we fully understood that the protection came from Hashem alone. Indeed with this in mind we could understand the base of the machlokes of what it is we should celebrate on the yom tov of Succos. Should we be celebrating the level of bitachon which B’nei Yisroel had in the midbar as demonstrated by their hishtadlus of building huts with the trust that the protection comes fully from Hashem, or the end result of Hashem’s actual protection of B’nei Yisroel with the ananei ha’kavod? The balance of hishtadlus and bitachon coupled with Hashem's positive response are both sides of the coin. Should our proverbial reaching our hands up be the cause of celebration, or Hashem reaching down to us to pull us up? Both are vital, both are complementary in the relationship, both are infused in the mitzva of succah.

Going back to the passuk in V’zos Ha’Beracha – the very last passuk of the Torah, perhaps this is the fundamental lesson with which the Torah chooses to conclude. It is true that the luchos were weightless as they miraculously carried their own weight. However, as much as Moshe trusted this that if Hashem was giving him the luchos that by definition he would be capable of carrying them, that trust did not translate to mean that Moshe would stand and watch while the luchos floated in mid-air. Rather, his full bitachon actually necessitated his approaching the luchos with a strong hand fully prepared to use his full strength to carry the luchos with the full bitachon that it would be within his capacity with Hashem’s help.

Our perspective as people must be that we have full bitachon in Hashem and His master plan. However, at the same time, we must recognize that sleeping in bed with such beliefs is actually not the highest form of bitachon, rather it is our physical exertion and investment into the correct path of our future along with our tefillos which fully demonstrates bitachon.

Even if we may pasken according to the Tur and Shulchan Aruch that the yom tov of Succos is primarily for recalling the ananei ha’kavod, there is no doubt that the yom tov remains as one which very much runs on the theme of bitachon and our physical expression of coming closer to Hashem. We refer to Succos as z’man simchaseinu (time of our joy)Pure happiness, as the Orchos Tzadikim explains, is really bitachon. After all, who is happier than one who has bitachon in Hashem? One of the reasons Succos is referred to as z’man simchaseinu is because it is the yom tov of the harvesting season when the crops are gathered from the fields. The Sefer Ha’Chinuch[21] writes that this is one of the reasons we take the daled minim (four species) on Succos. After all, what better time is there than Succos to use to channel our happiness from our hishtadlus in the field and direct it towards celebrating the bitachon we have in Hashem. It is not celebrating our hard work and toil as the cause of a plentiful harvest, but rather celebrating the bitachon we had and continue to have in Hashem as expressed by our hishtadlus coupled with the knowledge that we are doing what we must but that ultimately everything is from Hashem. This representation of the daled minim, along with the fact that they simultaneously represent our own physical selves as individuals as well as k’lal yisroel as a whole coming together to demonstrate our new efforts and hishtadlus we will put in this new year with bitachon in Hashem, is precisely the connection of daled minim to the yom tov of Succos. Hashem’s response in return is confirmation to our beautiful and never ending relationship with His request that we spend another day together and celebrate the yom yov of Shemini Atzeres.

As we conclude the yom tov of Succos and Shemini Atzeres along with Simchas Torah, let us take the lesson of the yom tov with us through the upcoming dark, winter months and throughout the   whole year. May Hashem help us internalize that despite our need to put in necessary effort, that ultimately everything comes from Hashem; and that it is with that exact recognition that our hishtadlus could become a pure act of bitachon. In this zechus (merit), may we, along with all of k’lal Yisroel experience a happy and healthy year of success and witness miracles to complement our enhanced hishtadlus as we witnessed during our travels in the midbar.




[1] Devarim 34:12
[2] Ibid.
[3] Ibid. See also the Re’eim
[4] See Ohr Ha’Chaim on Devarim 9:17 who writes this explicitly. Other meforshim (commentaries) explain the passuk here as one unit with the end of the passuk that it was Moshe’s “strength” which allowed him to break the luchos despite all the effort it took to get them. However, according to the simple reading of the passuk with Rashi, and certainly according to the Sifsei Chochomim and the Re’eim, the question stands.
[5] Tur O.C. 625:1
[6] Vayikra 23:43
[7] Shulchan Aruch O.C. 625:1
[8] Succah 11b
[9] Hilchos Succah klal 146
[10] Vayikra 23:43
[11] Rashi Gemara Succah 11b
[12] Yalkut Shimoni 22:163
[13] Tehillim 18:38
[14] Shmuel I 31:17
[15] Divrei Hayamim II 14:12
[16] Ibid.20:22
[17] Melachim II 19:35
[18] Sha’ar Ha’BitachonPerek 4
[19] See Shmuel I 16:2 for example, when Shmuel – a navi – expressed worry of Shaul killing him. The worry of acting in a way that Shaul might find out and go after him was not out of lack of faith that life and death is all in Hashem’s hand, rather it was a declaration of his own need to put in the hishtadlus of staying safe from Shaul because of his own bitachon that he knew everything would turn out the way it should.
[20] Sotah 37a
[21] Sefer Ha’Chinuch mitzvah 324