Friday, April 24, 2015

Parshas Tazria-Metzora - A Time to Tweet: Don’t Kill Two Birds with One Tone

~ Thoughts on the Parsha ~
Parshas Tazria-Metzora



A Time to Tweet:
Don’t Kill Two Birds with One Tone
By: Daniel Listhaus

וְצִוָּה הַכֹּהֵן וְלָקַח לַמִּטַּהֵר שְׁתֵּי צִפֳּרִים חַיּוֹת טְהֹרוֹת וְעֵץ אֶרֶז וּשְׁנִי תוֹלַעַת וְאֵזֹב

“The Kohen shall command; and for the person being purified there shall be taken two live, pure birds, cedarwood, a crimson [tongue of] wool, and hyssop.”
-Metzorah 14:4
                                                                                     
After having detailed the characteristics of the various tzara’as afflictions that could appear on one’s body and clothing in Parshas Tazria, Parshas Metzorah opens with a description of the process for the metzorah (person with tzara’as) to become tahor (pure). Rashi[1] explains that each of the items required as part of the tahara process had a specific role and symbolization.

The first component listed in the passuk (verse) is the pair of birds. Rashi[2] comments that the reason why the Torah demands that the metzorah bring a karbon (offering) of birds is for the following reason: “Since the afflictions of tzara’as come about because of malicious talk, which is an act of verbal twittering, therefore, as part of the afflicted one’s purification, he is required to bring birds that constantly twitter with the sound of their chirping.”

The problem with this Rashi is that Rashi seems to conveniently leave out two important facts about this bird sacrifice. First, there were two birds required as part of the purification process; Rashi’s explanation only answers why the Torah requires the metzora to bring a bird as a karbon but falls short of clarifying why two birds are necessary. Why is it that the metzora needs to bring two birds as part of becoming tahor?

Second, the offering of these two birds is very different from all other karbanos. The passuk describes that only one bird was slaughtered as part of the karbon while the other bird was kept alive and set free over an open field to fly away. What is the purpose of catching a bird just to set it free? What does it represent? Furthermore, given Rashi’s explanation as to why the metzora was commanded to bring birds as his karbon, how could we understand this ritual of setting the bird free? If the whole purpose of bringing the birds was to serve as a final reminder to the metzora to think before he starts chirping like a bird with non-stop tweeting, then why was he commanded to set the second bird free? Wouldn’t that offset the role of slaughtering the first bird?

The Orchos Tzaddikim[3] writes[4] that the aveirah (sin) of lashon harrah (evil speech) is compared to the three cardinal aveiros: avodah zarrah (idol worship), shefichus damim (murder), and giluy araiyos (immoral relationships). At first glance it seems like quite an exaggerated comparison. After all, how could speaking badly about someone possibly compare to committing such horrific crimes? Yet, as the Orchos Tzaddikim explains, the comparison is not as extreme as it would appear in the overall scheme of things for a number of reasons. Besides for the gravity of the actual aveira of lashon harrah because of the tremendous damage it is capable of, it is also a very difficult aveirah to do teshuva for. First of all, like by all aveiros which are in the category of bein adom l’chaveiro (between man and his friend), it is not enough to go through the teshuva (repentance) process and ask forgiveness from Hashem. Hashem does not forgive aveiros bein adom l’chaveiro until one has first achieved mechilla (forgiveness) from the one who the person hurt. This makes doing a complete teshuva particularly difficult in the case of speaking lashon harrah because, being a “light mitzvah” which is transgressed by many on a constant basis, it is near impossible to remember everyone one ever spoke badly about – whether true or not – to be able to ask forgiveness from each one individually. Furthermore, unlike committing murder or many other aveiros which have immediate consequences and clear cause and effect chains and are therefore easier to regret right away, lashon harrah takes the form of merely speaking badly about another who is not necessarily even there when the initial lashon harrah is being said. All these factors put into perspective the seriousness of lashon harrah from a teshuva standpoint let alone all the global and perennial damage that the lashon harrah itself could do to a person’s reputation for generations.

            However, there is yet another aspect of lashon harrah which is often overlooked. If one stops for a moment and considers the aveiros that are done between man and a fellow man, there is more often than not a motive attached to the action done. Stealing, damaging, murdering, or committing any aveirah are often linked back to a flawed character trait. Perhaps there is jealousy or anger, perhaps lust or greed, but with little exception there is always something behind an action done. We must keep in mind though that it is a two-way street. Just as motives and flaws in one’s character lead to committing terrible aveiros, so too does giving in to these drives and turning them into actions further make the person more imperfect and increases the likelihood of repeating the aveiros in the future. As chazal teach us, “aveirah goreres avairah” (sins lead to more sins).

            This idea is in a way scarier when it comes to lashon harrah because oftentimes when lashon harrah is being said it is not necessarily done with any malicious intent. Sometimes people just start talking about other people and some things are good and some things are bad. There may be no surface jealousy, anger, or any reason per se` to be saying the lashon harrah other than for the sake of keeping a conversation interesting. Yet, it is important to bear in mind that the two-way relationship still exists and that as a result of merely speaking lashon harrah – an aveirah which at its core is an insensitivity to others and a general negativity – the one who speaks it or listens to it further becomes an insensitive person and one with a general negative outlook on the world. For example, the Orchos Tzaddikim relates a simple, but telling story of two people who were walking across a field and passed by a dead animal carcass. One person who was accustomed to speaking lashon harrah commented, “See how rotten and smelly this carcass is!” While the chochom (literally: wise one; here loosely means one who is more meticulous of mitzvos) who was with him observed, “Notice how white its teeth are!”

            One who accustoms himself to speaking and listening to lashon harrah simultaneously trains his head to be less sensitive to others and to see things in a more negative light. Such people enjoy searching for the dirt on people just as flies are attracted to filth and garbage.

            As some of the 2016 United States presidential candidates have formally announced their running for president, all are aware of the bad-mouthing and dirt digging that follows. Past mistakes that were made, letters that were written, rules which were not followed – all will surface in the upcoming months. Years worth of phone calls and emails which may have been recorded by someone and saved will come back to haunt them while government records and tax reports are dusted off to re-examine.

As scary all this sounds, it is nothing compared to what presidential candidates in the year 2040 and beyond will have to worry about. With social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter being founded in the early 2000’s, when the year 2040 comes around, chances are that any given potential candidate will have tons of dirt and bad stuff to their name. Whether it be dumb comments or unflattering pictures, there will likely be more garbage that they will have to worry about going public then all presidential candidates before them combined had to worry about. However, the amazing thing is that a large chunk of it will not have originated by early enemies or opposing parties, but rather information which came from what was posted and volunteered by the closest friends of the candidates and the candidates themselves when they were younger. There is practically no filter of what people are willing to publicly post about themselves and their friends; not necessarily out of jealousy, anger, or anything other than fun, or more accurately – insensitivity to the basic respect deserving of a human. The more that is posted, the lower the standards drop and rubber-bands back to desensitize people even more to humiliating and debasing others.

Lashon harrah, like all speech, comes out through the mouth, but it really starts and ends in the head. One will say things based on his or her outlook, attitude, and mindset; and at the same time, what one says bounces back and reinforces the initial apathy towards debasing others while also setting a stronger foundation for one to have a negative perspective in general.

However, as is often the case, things that could be so destructive with one application could be powerfully constructive the other way as well. Words could be used in so many good ways to build self esteem and encourage others. The extent of goodness that that could reach has the potential to be just as great – spreading inspiration on a global scale as well as ripple effecting through generations. Perhaps this is the symbolism in the metzora’s tahara process. The requirement of bringing two birds – one to be slaughtered and the other to be set free, serves as a final reminder as the metzora prepares himself to rejoin k’lal Yisroel that we are tasked not just be extremely careful to stay away from lashon harrah, but even more – to try hard to say encouraging and nice things to people. In this way the former metzora could not just be a part of ensuring that society does not break down, but actually help in building it up and keeping it together and strong.

May Hashem help us during this time of sefiras ha’omeir, a time which reminds us year after year to work on our relationships bein adom l’chaveiro, to take the lesson of the metzora to heart and take at least a small step forward in being cognizant not just of what we say or spread about others but also what we say or spread about ourselves. In the merit of working on lashon harrah and perfecting bein adom l’chaveiro may we be ready to receive the Torah on Shavuos in Yerushalayim.



[1] Vayikra 14:4-6
[2] Vayikra 14:4 See also Gemara Arachin 15b
[3] Sha’ar Lashon Harrah
[4] Based on Gemara Aruchin

Friday, April 17, 2015

Parshas Shemini - Half and Half: You Are What You Eat

~ Thoughts on the Parsha ~
Parshas Shemini



Half and Half: You Are What You Eat
By: Daniel Listhaus

כִּי אֲנִי ה' אֱלֹקיכֶם וְהִתְקַדִּשְׁתֶּם וִהְיִיתֶם קְדשִׁים כִּי קָדוֹשׁ אָנִי וְלֹא תְטַמְּאוּ אֶת נַפְשֹׁתֵיכֶם בְּכָל הַשֶּׁרֶץ הָרֹמֵשׂ עַל הָאָרֶץ: כִּי אֲנִי ה' הַמַּעֲלֶה אֶתְכֶם מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרַיִם לִהְיֹת לָכֶם לֵאלֹקים וִהְיִיתֶם קְדשִׁים כִּי קָדוֹשׁ אָנִי: זֹאת תּוֹרַת הַבְּהֵמָה וְהָעוֹף וְכֹל נֶפֶשׁ הַחַיָּה הָרֹמֶשֶׂת בַּמָּיִם וּלְכָל נֶפֶשׁ הַשֹּׁרֶצֶת עַל הָאָרֶץ: לְהַבְדִּיל בֵּין הַטָּמֵא וּבֵין הַטָּהֹר וּבֵין הַחַיָּה הַנֶּאֱכֶלֶת וּבֵין הַחַיָּה אֲשֶׁר לֹא תֵאָכֵל

“For I am Hashem your G-d – you are to sanctify yourselves and you shall become holy, for I am holy; and you shall not make your souls impure through any creeping thing that creeps on the earth. For I am Hashem Who brings you up from the land of Egypt to be a G-d unto you; you shall be holy, for I am holy. This is the law of the animal, the bird, every living creature that swarms in the water, and for every creature that creeps on the ground; For distinguishing between the impure and the pure, and between the creature that may be eaten and the creature that may not be eaten.”
-Shemini 11:44-47

            The second half of this week's parsha provides the basis of the laws of kashrus – defining which animals are tahor (pure) and which are not. The Torah describes that as far as land animals are concerned, the way to tell if they are tahor is if they have split hooves and also chew their cud. One sign does not suffice.[1] When it comes to describing the necessary signs for fish, the Torah seems to be more generous requiring only fins and scales – resulting in a much larger variety of delicacies than we are allowed by land animals. Additionally, there is a leniency by fish, compared to land animals, which is that the Torah does not require fish to be slaughtered in order to render them kosher. The Torah continues by listing the non-kosher birds, which is also not as long as the list of non-tahor land animals. The Torah then goes on to forbid any type of insect that flies[2] and continues to forbid any type of insect which creeps on the ground.

            The parsha concludes with the summary quoted above – that we must differentiate between that which is pure for us and that which is not. During this summary, the Torah seems to throw in an unnecessary piece of information: “For I am Hashem Who brings you up from the land of Egypt to be a G-d unto you; you shall be holy, for I am holy”.[3] Why is it that Hashem reminds us this at this particular point? Did we need another dose of memory pills to realize that Hashem was bringing us into Eretz Yisroel? Why now is the Torah mentioning us coming out of Mitzrayim?

            Rashi[4] on this passuk (verse) is bothered by this and offers two explanations. Rashi's first answer is that the passuk is teaching us that the reason Hashem brought us up from Mitzrayim was solely on the condition that we accept His mitzvos. This explanation is extremely vague and does not seem to address the issue at all. Still, why is it written here? It makes sense to mention it in the parsha of tzitzis, for example, which represents all mitzvos. What purpose, though, does this reminder serve specifically here?

            Before we further ponder this first answer of Rashi, let us take a look at the second explanation he offers. Rashi writes that if you notice, the passuk (verse) says that, “I am Hashem Who brings you up from Mitzrayim” as opposed to the regular, “I brought you out of Mitzrayim”. The reason for this is, as Rashi brings from Tana D'vei R' Yishmael, that it would be worth it for Hashem to take us out of Mitzrayim for this mitzva alone – of not becoming impure through creeping things. Although this explanation is more specific it is still hard to understand. What is so special about this particular mitzva that the merit of keeping this mitzva alone is enough of a reason for Hashem to take us into Eretz Yisroel?

            The Kli Yakar[5] is also bothered by this Rashi so he takes a slightly different angle based on the following observation. There seems to be a positive correlation between the harsher terminologies the Torah uses to describe the effect that impure animals have on our souls, and the closer the animal is to the ground. Fish, which live in the water, only require to have fins and scales. They do not even need to be slaughtered. When it comes to birds – which are animals of the air, though they have a deep connection to earth as well, also have few restrictions. However, once the Torah enters the area of land animals, it becomes a new playing field. The strict requirements of an animal needing split hooves and must chew its cud, eliminates most animals. Even within this limitation, however, a proper slaughtering is still necessary before a four-legged animal becomes fit to eat. As we get into the territory of creeping and crawling insects, the borders close completely, allowing almost no insect to be eaten for any reason.

            The Kli Yakar takes this observation and explains that the area which creatures live in tell a lot about their purity or impurity. The closer an animal lives to the ground, the more impure it is and the worse the effect will be on one's soul if the creature is consumed. This is why even kosher animals require shechita (to be slaughtered), whereas fish, which come from a pure place – water – do not require shechita.[6] The Kli Yakar then continues to explain that this is the reason why people do not walk on “all-fours”. The reason we walk on two feet is because although half of us is made of dirt and has a pull towards mundane activities and desires, the other half of us is spiritual and turns upward, seeking a closeness with Hashem.

            Perhaps with this Kli Yakar we could understand the Rashi better as well. The ultimate purpose of living is to use the mitzvos to live a life of taharah (purity) and become closer to Hashem through them. However, every person must remember that we are constantly in a struggle between the two parts that make up every human being. Part of us knows we are made of dirt and therefore wants to follow impure desires and lifestyles. The other half of us realizes its potential as a tzelem Elokim and seeks the highest levels of taharah. Our job is to acknowledge these two aspects of man and channel our desires away from things which are detrimental to the neshama and instead focus on things which help us grow spiritually in ways we could become closer to Hashem.

            This yesod (fundamental idea) is perhaps what the Torah is teaching us by specifically choosing this mitzva to say that for this alone it would be worth bringing us up to Eretz Yisroel. Realizing that man in made of half ruchniyos and half gashmiyos and that we must choose which side we will activate and turn our attention towards with extreme care and concern, is of utmost importance for man to live a proper life. This delicate balance, which each person maintains, could be affected at every level. Even the type of food we allow into our system has the ability to favor the gashmiyos part of us and pull us in that direction.

            The world and its effects on man are so intricate and part of the deep secrets of the world we do not understand. However, the one thing we must understand is that Hashem gave us a Torah to guide us on how to live life properly. The Torah tells us that there is a intrinsic difference between tahor and non-tahor animals. Our job is to realize that not only is it true that 'You are what you eat', but even more, that it is our task to realize what is tahor and what is not in order to make sure that we are constantly feeding the ruchniyos half of us, and not the half which is trapped in gashmiyos.



[1]    Such as in the case of a camel, which only chews its cud, or a pig which only has split hooves.
[2]    Except for a few flavors of grasshoppers.
[3]    Vayikra 11:45
[4]    Ibid.
[5]    Vayikra 11:45
[6]    The obvious question on this, which the Kli Yakar discusses, is if so that water indeed represents a place of taharah (as a matter of fact, we become tahor in a mikvah of water), then why is it that in order for foods to be susceptible to tumah (impurity), they must be wet from water? The Kli Yakar discusses this in parshas Chukas (19:21) and gives a fascinating answer which answers this as well as offers insight into the way parah aduma works – a process of tahara which simultaneously purifies the one impure and, paradoxically,  makes the pure impure.